arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Changqin Quan

Publications and source records attributed to Changqin Quan.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Exact Truncation and Radial Rigidity in Time-Optimal Control

We consider minimum-time control for the linear system $$ \dot{z}(t)=Az(t)+Bu(t),\qquad \|u\|_{L^\infty(0,\infty;\mathbb{R}^m)}\leq 1, $$ with $A\in\mathbb R^{n\times n}$ and $B\in\mathbb R^{n\times m}$. While the individual point-target and ball-target problems are classical, we study a different question: when are their optimal controls exactly compatible, in the sense that, for every nonzero initial state $x$ and all sufficiently small $\varepsilon>0$, the optimal control for the tolerance ball $\overline{B}_\varepsilon(0)$ is precisely the restriction of the point-target optimal control? We prove that this {\it{exact truncation}} property is equivalent to the rigidity conditions $$ B B^\top=βI_n,\qquad A+A^\top=2aI_n, \qquad β>0,\; a\leq 0, $$ and also to Euclidean radiality of the point-target minimum-time function. Thus exact truncation holds precisely when the sublevel sets of the point-target minimum-time function are Euclidean balls centered at the origin, matching the geometry of the tolerance targets. Moreover, the local property automatically extends to every $0<\varepsilon<|x|$, and the resulting optimal times and point-target optimal feedback are both explicit.

math.OC

Endpoint Asymptotics of Optimal Stabilization Prefactors

Consider the stabilizable finite-dimensional linear control system $\dot x=Ax+Bu$. For a prescribed decay rate $δ>0$, we define the optimal stabilization prefactor $$ \hat{C}(δ) := \inf_{K\in\mathbb{R}^{m\times n}} \sup_{t\ge0}e^{δt}\|e^{(A+BK)t}\|. $$ We determine its asymptotic behavior as $δ$ approaches the right endpoint of the achievable decay-rate range. If $(A,B)$ is controllable and $μ$ is its largest controllability index, then $\hat{C}(δ)\asympδ^{μ-1}$ as $δ\to+\infty$; whereas if $(A,B)$ is stabilizable but not controllable, then $\hat{C}(δ)\asymp(δ_*-δ)^{-(q-1)}$ as $δ\uparrowδ_*$, where $δ_*$ is the supremal achievable decay rate and $q$ is the largest size of a Jordan block of the uncontrollable part associated with the spectral boundary $\operatorname{Re}λ=-δ_*$. Thus, in both cases, the endpoint asymptotic order of $\hat{C}(δ)$ is determined by the corresponding structural invariant---$μ$ in the controllable case and $q$ in the noncontrollable case---and conversely this order recovers that invariant.

math.OC