arXiv subjects

Carson Rodrigues

Publications and source records attributed to Carson Rodrigues.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Predicted Cortex Is Not a Domain-General Prior: A Matched-Control Audit of Brain-Encoding Features for Video Memorability

Brain-encoding foundation models predict fMRI responses to video, audio and text well enough to win the Algonauts 2025 challenge. We ask whether their predicted responses, obtained with no scanner, are a useful feature lens for a human-behavior task: forecasting short-video memorability. Each clip is projected into TRIBE v2's predicted cortical space and scored by ridge regression against a matched control, the model's own V-JEPA2 visual backbone taken before the brain projection. The answer is dataset-dependent. Within Memento10k (499 clips) the backbone wins (Spearman 0.594 vs 0.544); within VideoMem (820 clips) the brain projection wins (0.415 vs 0.368). Because the claim is that the ordering reverses, we test the reversal itself: the dataset-by-representation interaction is +0.097, 95% CI [+0.032, +0.160], two-sided bootstrap p=0.001, and over 10 cross-validation seeds the datasets separate completely (0/10 seeds favor the brain projection on Memento10k, 10/10 on VideoMem). Cross-dataset transfer inherits the split: Memento10k->VideoMem the brain projection wins (+0.076); the reverse loses heavily (-0.311). The VideoMem advantage is not a sample-size artifact (it survives matched training size and PCA-then-ridge) and not mere compression (a compressed, heavily regularized or transfer-tuned backbone stays below it). Predicted-brain features thus carry a small but real memorability signal the backbone misses on one dataset and not the other: a dataset-specific representation, not a domain-general prior. A vision-orthogonal component (partial Spearman 0.19, permutation p=2.5e-4) localizes to ventral occipito-temporal cortex, and predicted BOLD dynamics add nothing beyond the time-average because 3-4 samples per clip cannot resolve the sub-second late memorability response. Our pre-specified within-dataset hypothesis returned NO-GO; the reversal is what survived.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

MCP Server Architecture Patterns for LLM-Integrated Applications

The Model Context Protocol (MCP), introduced by Anthropic in November 2024, defines a standardized interface for connecting large language models (LLMs) to external tools, data sources, and services. Within months of release, hundreds of community-built MCP servers appeared on GitHub, but no software-maintenance literature has yet described how the ecosystem is being structured in production. This industry experience paper catalogues five recurring MCP server architectural patterns observed across an enumerated corpus of fifteen independently developed servers (five production servers from the ANSYR voice AI platform plus ten public servers from the official MCP registry): Resource Gateway, Tool Orchestrator, Stateful Session Server, Proxy Aggregator, and Domain-Specific Adapter. Each pattern is described in the structured form of Gamma et al.: context, problem, solution, and consequences. We also document four anti-patterns and a set of cross-cutting concerns around authentication, versioning, and observability. The quantitative evaluation contributes three measurements: inter-rater reliability of the taxonomy across two independent LLM raters on 54 held-out servers (Cohen's kappa = 0.76), which also localizes three pattern-boundary ambiguities; transport overhead measured end-to-end on loopback and modeled for cross-host paths; and a tool-count study showing tool-selection accuracy drops below 90% between 10 and 15 tools per context for Claude Haiku 4.5 and between 20 and 30 tools for Sonnet 4. Code, corpus, and prompts are released as a replication package.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

When Is an LLM Worth It for Hyperparameter Optimization? A Budget-Matched Study on Tabular Data Finds the Warm-Start Is a Default Configuration, Not the Model

Large language models (LLMs) have been proposed as hyperparameter-optimization (HPO) advisors that "warm-start" search from prior knowledge, proposing strong configurations in very few evaluations. We test that claim under a budget-matched, multi-seed protocol on eight PMLB tabular benchmarks, comparing an LLM advisor (LLM-OptFlow) against four classical baselines (random search, Optuna-TPE, Gaussian-process Bayesian optimization, and successive halving) over one shared search space, with paired tests and bootstrap 95% CIs across 8 x 5 = 40 (task, seed) units. The finding is cautionary. The advisor's strong first point is not an LLM output at all: like prior LLM-HPO systems the loop is seeded with a fixed default configuration, evaluated before any model call, which alone reaches 88.7% mean best-CV, identical to within 0.01 pp across all seven advisor models tested. The LLM's own proposals add only +0.40 pp of cross-validation accuracy over that seed and nothing on held-out test (LLM-Default = -0.01 pp, p = 0.92). When the same seed is granted to classical search, the apparent lead collapses: against seeded random search it leads by +0.20 pp at 2 evaluations, is tied by 5, and is behind by 12 (-0.37 pp). Without the seed, classical search ties the advisor by 12 evaluations and beats it by 40 (+0.6 to +0.8 pp, p <= 1e-4). Two LLM-specific behaviors survive: a single-task exploration failure (vehicle), and a rule-based confidence filter that removes ~33% of wasted compute without changing accuracy. The recommendation is deflationary: on tabular HPO, seed classical search with a sensible default; an LLM advisor adds no measurable generalization benefit and is overtaken within a handful of evaluations. We release the harness and a script that reproduces every statistic.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Hallucination as Context Drift: Synchronization Protocols for Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Multi-agent LLM systems routinely produce hallucinated outputs that cannot be explained by model deficiencies alone. A significant class of these failures arises not from model incapacity but from context drift: the divergence of internal knowledge states between concurrent agents. When agents enter a collaborative task with mismatched or stale representations of shared world state, their joint reasoning produces contradictions that manifest as hallucination. We define the Context Divergence Score (CDS), a lightweight scalar metric quantifying knowledge-state discrepancy between agent pairs across spatial, temporal, and task dimensions, and propose the Shared State Verification Protocol (SSVP), which lets agents periodically exchange compressed state summaries and flag high-divergence conditions before joint reasoning. We evaluate SSVP across two domains (multi-agent travel and software project planning) using Claude Haiku. In controlled experiments (n=30 per condition, travel; n=10, software) across 8 scenarios, naive full-broadcast synchronization increases hallucination rate by 34% above the no-sync baseline (HR: 0.658 vs. 0.492, p=0.0022, d=1.18), a contamination effect from propagating erroneous agent states. SSVP avoids this failure mode while showing modest, consistent reduction (HR: 0.463, d=0.30) and achieves significantly lower hallucination than full-broadcast (p=0.0005, d=1.47) using 58% fewer API calls. The contamination effect does not replicate in the software domain, where all conditions converge to low HR (<0.2), confirming it is specific to tasks where one erroneous shared belief cascades across evaluation dimensions. Our results reframe hallucination mitigation as a distributed systems problem and establish context synchronization as a first-class primitive in multi-agent LLM design.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

When Do LLMs Replace Fine-Tuned NLU? A Decision Framework for Intent Detection in Production Conversational Systems

A common claim is that zero-shot large language models (LLMs) can replace fine-tuned NLU classifiers for intent detection. We test this claim head-to-head and find that the honest answer is: it depends on the intent space. On full ATIS and CLINC150 we compare a fine-tuned RoBERTa, a TF-IDF+logistic-regression baseline, sentence-embedding kNN, and Claude Haiku zero-shot, reporting bootstrap 95% confidence intervals and paired significance tests. When abundant in-domain labels exist, fine-tuned RoBERTa is as good or better and three orders of magnitude cheaper and faster: on ATIS it beats Claude zero-shot by 11.8 points (95.9 vs. 84.1, p<0.001). On the broad 150-intent CLINC150 schema the two are statistically tied (89.1 vs. 88.5, p=0.24): the LLM matches a fully supervised model with no training data. The LLM's advantages appear in three production-relevant regimes: out-of-scope detection (OOS recall 85.6 vs. 58.1 for RoBERTa); robustness to realistic ASR noise via a controlled text-to-speech to noise to Whisper pipeline (92.5 vs. 80.0 at 0 dB); and dynamic per-deployment schemas, where a classifier trained on one app's intents scores 0% on a new app's intents while the schema-prompted LLM serves both at ~94% with zero retraining. We distill these findings into a decision framework for practitioners.

cs.CL↗