arXiv subjects

Cameron Beeche

Publications and source records attributed to Cameron Beeche.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

ETHOS: Towards a Modular Ethics Framework for Clinical Multi-Agent Systems

The rapid adoption of large language models has enabled the development of clinical multi-agent systems (MAS) capable of integrating multimodal patient data and supporting increasingly complex clinical decision-making. However, the deployment of these systems in real-world healthcare settings raises critical ethical concerns related to safety, fairness, accountability, transparency, and patient trust. While numerous organizations, including the World Health Organization, the National Academy of Medicine, and the FUTURE-AI consortium, have proposed ethical frameworks and governance principles for healthcare AI, these efforts remain largely conceptual. To address this challenge, we present ETHOS (Ethics and Trust through Hierarchical Oversight System), a modular ethics framework designed as a governance meta-agent that can be integrated with any existing multi-agent system without requiring changes to its underlying architecture. ETHOS translates stakeholder-informed ethical requirements into executable runtime oversight through a layered governance approach consisting of deterministic checks, contextual reviews, and a final ethics critic. These components continuously evaluate intermediate reasoning steps and final outputs, enabling the system to identify ethical risks, request revisions, or suppress responses that fail predefined safety and trustworthiness criteria. We demonstrate ETHOS within a hepatology clinical decision-support MAS. Results show that ETHOS improves decision reliability by detecting incomplete, inconsistent, or out-of-scope evidence and appropriately increasing abstention when safe recommendations cannot be supported. By embedding ethical governance directly into system operation, ETHOS provides a practical and auditable mechanism for transforming high-level AI ethics principles into deployable safeguards.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2026

Flow-based conditional cardiac anatomy generation for virtual cohorts

Cardiac digital twin research is moving from subject-specific anatomical replicas toward virtual cohorts that represent clinically relevant population subgroups. Yet access to representative imaging-derived anatomy datasets remains limited by cohort size, subgroup sparsity, and data-sharing constraints. Conditional generative models could help address this gap, but virtual cohorts are useful only if they preserve realistic, metadata-dependent anatomical variability. Existing cardiac anatomy generators largely rely on conditional variational autoencoders (cVAEs), which couple representation learning and metadata conditioning through a shared regularized latent prior. We introduce CAN-FLOW, a two-step Conditional ANatomy generation framework based on normalizing FLOWs that first learns geometry-only latent representations of diffeomorphic cardiac shape momenta and then models their sex-, age-, and body-mass-index-dependent distribution with a conditional normalizing flow. We trained CAN-FLOW on 2,208 healthy UK Biobank subjects and compared it with cVAEs across regularization strengths. CAN-FLOW generated plausible stochastic biventricular anatomies that better reproduced clinical phenotype distributions, metadata-dependent trends, subgroup variability, point-cloud coverage, and high-dimensional shape variability. Together, these results establish CAN-FLOW as a shareable framework for generating realistic, stochastically varying, metadata-conditioned biventricular anatomies for virtual cohort construction and in silico clinical trial workflows.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Unveiling sex dimorphism in the healthy cardiac anatomy: fundamental differences between male and female heart shapes

Sex-based differences in cardiovascular disease are well documented, yet the precise nature and extent of these discrepancies in cardiac anatomy remain incompletely understood. Traditional scaling models often fail to capture the interplay of age, blood pressure, and body size, prompting a more nuanced investigation. Here, we employ statistical shape modeling in a healthy subset (n=456) of the UK Biobank to explore sex-specific variations in biventricular anatomy. We reconstruct 3D meshes and perform multivariate analyses of shape coefficients, controlling for age, blood pressure, and various body size metrics. Our findings reveal that sex alone explains at least 25 percent of morphological variability, with strong discrimination between men and women (AUC=0.96-0.71) persisting even after correction for confounders. Notably, the most discriminative modes highlight pronounced differences in cardiac chamber volumes, the anterior-posterior width of the right ventricle, and the relative positioning of the cardiac chambers. These results underscore that sex has a fundamental influence on cardiac morphology, which may have important clinical implications for differing cardiac structural assessments in men and women. Future work should investigate how these anatomical differences manifest in various cardiovascular conditions, ultimately paving the way for more precise risk stratification and personalized therapeutic strategies for both men and women.

q-bio.TO↗