arXiv subjects

Bundit Manaskasemsak

Publications and source records attributed to Bundit Manaskasemsak.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

How Developers Discuss Generative AI: A Longitudinal Study of the Visual Studio Code Community

Generative AI tools such as GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and coding agents have rapidly become part of everyday software development, yet little is known about how mainstream open source communities discuss them in practice. This paper presents a longitudinal analysis of generative-AI-related discussions in the Visual Studio Code (VS Code) GitHub repository, using 43,806 candidate issues created between January 2021 and June 2026. To improve corpus quality, we combined keyword retrieval with semantic relevance filtering, yielding a filtered corpus of 25,227 AI-related issues. We applied BERTopic to the retrieved corpus to identify discussion topics, using the filtered corpus for theme validation and a robustness re-clustering, and analyzed their evolution over time using monthly prevalence and Mann-Kendall trend tests. The results show that developer discussions are dominated by practical concerns regarding the operation of AI-assisted development environments, including agent management, configuration, reliability, authentication, and billing, whereas risks frequently emphasized in survey-based studies, such as hallucination and licensing, rarely surface in this venue. This suggests that discussions of generative AI in the VS Code issue tracker primarily focus on operational aspects of AI-assisted software development. Furthermore, discussions evolved from AI-assisted code completion toward conversational and agent-based development, reflecting the increasing integration of generative AI into software development workflows. These findings suggest that GitHub Issues provide a practical, workflow-oriented perspective on generative AI that complements survey-based studies of developer perceptions.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Agent READMEs: An Empirical Study of Context Files for Agentic Coding

Agentic coding tools receive goals written in natural language, break them down into specific tasks, and write or execute code with minimal human intervention. Central to this process are agent context files (e.g., AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md) that provide persistent, project-level instructions. In this paper, we conduct the first large-scale empirical study of 2,303 agent context files from 1,925 repositories to characterize their structure, maintenance, and content. We find that these files are not static documentation but complex, difficultto-read artifacts that evolve like configuration code through frequent, small additions. Our content analysis of 16 instruction types shows that developers prioritize functional context, such as test procedures (75.9%), implementation details (70.8%), and architecture (68.1%). We also identify a significant gap: non-functional requirements such as security (14.8%) and performance (14.5%) are rarely specified. These findings indicate that while developers use context files to make agents functional, they provide few guardrails to ensure that agent-written code is secure or performant, highlighting the need for improved tools and practices.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Detecting and Characterizing Low and No Functionality Packages in the NPM Ecosystem

Trivial packages, small modules with low functionality, are common in the npm ecosystem and can pose security risks despite their simplicity. This paper refines existing definitions and introduce data-only packages that contain no executable logic. A rule-based static analysis method is developed to detect trivial and data-only packages and evaluate their prevalence and associated risks in the 2025 npm ecosystem. The analysis shows that 17.92% of packages are trivial, with vulnerability levels comparable to non-trivial ones, and data-only packages, though rare, also contain risks. The proposed detection tool achieves 94% accuracy (macro-F1 0.87), enabling effective large-scale analysis to reduce security exposure. This findings suggest that trivial and data-only packages warrant greater attention in dependency management to reduce potential technical debt and security exposure.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

On the Use of Agentic Coding Manifests: An Empirical Study of Claude Code

Agentic coding tools receive goals written in natural language as input, break them down into specific tasks, and write/execute the actual code with minimal human intervention. Key to this process are agent manifests, configuration files (such as Claude.md) that provide agents with essential project context, identity, and operational rules. However, the lack of comprehensive and accessible documentation for creating these manifests presents a significant challenge for developers. We analyzed 253 Claude.md files from 242 repositories to identify structural patterns and common content. Our findings show that manifests typically have shallow hierarchies with one main heading and several subsections, with content dominated by operational commands, technical implementation notes, and high-level architecture.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2022

An Empirical Evaluation of Competitive Programming AI: A Case Study of AlphaCode

AlphaCode is a code generation system for assisting software developers in solving competitive programming problems using natural language problem descriptions. Despite the advantages of the code generating system, the open source community expressed concerns about practicality and data licensing. However, there is no research investigating generated codes in terms of code clone and performance. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study to find code similarities and performance differences between AlphaCode-generated codes and human codes. The results show that (i) the generated codes from AlphaCode are similar to human codes (i.e., the average maximum similarity score is 0.56) and (ii) the generated code performs on par with or worse than the human code in terms of execution time and memory usage. Moreover, AlphaCode tends to generate more similar codes to humans for low-difficulty problems (i.e., four cases have the exact same codes). It also employs excessive nested loops and unnecessary variable declarations for high-difficulty problems, which cause low performance regarding our manual investigation. The replication package is available at https:/doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6820681

cs.SE↗

arXiv2019

Identifying Algorithm Names in Code Comments

For recent machine-learning-based tasks like API sequence generation, comment generation, and document generation, large amount of data is needed. When software developers implement algorithms in code, we find that they often mention algorithm names in code comments. Code annotated with such algorithm names can be valuable data sources. In this paper, we propose an automatic method of algorithm name identification. The key idea is extracting important N-gram words containing the word `algorithm' in the last. We also consider part of speech patterns to derive rules for appropriate algorithm name identification. The result of our rule evaluation produced high precision and recall values (more than 0.70). We apply our rules to extract algorithm names in a large amount of comments from active FLOSS projects written in seven programming languages, C, C++, Java, JavaScript, Python, PHP, and Ruby, and report commonly mentioned algorithm names in code comments.

cs.SE↗