arXiv subjects

Bruce J. Wittmann

Publications and source records attributed to Bruce J. Wittmann.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Advances in Machine Learning for Directed Evolution: A Five-Year Retrospective

The last five-plus years have seen many protein engineering disciplines transformed by advances in machine learning (ML), but the same cannot be said for directed evolution. Reflecting on a previously co-authored perspective, I discuss why I believe this to be the case, arguing that a disconnect between the goals of machine-learning-assisted directed evolution (MLDE) researchers--"identify an optimal protein"--and the goals of directed evolution more broadly--"identify a sufficient protein given time and resource constraints"--is a principal culprit. As an example, I highlight how nearly all current MLDE methods neglect to account for the cost of DNA synthesis, resulting in strategies that have limited practical applicability regardless of the underlying models' capabilities. I close by discussing recent works that are exceptions to this overarching trend, and emphasize that the last five years of efforts in ML-assisted protein engineering and the prescribed reframe of MLDE objectives need not be mutually exclusive.

q-bio.BM↗

arXiv2025

Steering Generative Models with Experimental Data for Protein Fitness Optimization

Protein fitness optimization involves finding a protein sequence that maximizes desired quantitative properties in a combinatorially large design space of possible sequences. Recent advances in steering protein generative models (e.g., diffusion models and language models) with labeled data offer a promising approach. However, most previous studies have optimized surrogate rewards and/or utilized large amounts of labeled data for steering, making it unclear how well existing methods perform and compare to each other in real-world optimization campaigns where fitness is measured through low-throughput wet-lab assays. In this study, we explore fitness optimization using small amounts (hundreds) of labeled sequence-fitness pairs and comprehensively evaluate strategies such as classifier guidance and posterior sampling for guiding generation from different discrete diffusion models of protein sequences. We also demonstrate how guidance can be integrated into adaptive sequence selection akin to Thompson sampling in Bayesian optimization, showing that plug-and-play guidance strategies offer advantages over alternatives such as reinforcement learning with protein language models. Overall, we provide practical insights into how to effectively steer modern generative models for next-generation protein fitness optimization.

q-bio.BM↗

arXiv2025

CARE: a Benchmark Suite for the Classification and Retrieval of Enzymes

Enzymes are important proteins that catalyze chemical reactions. In recent years, machine learning methods have emerged to predict enzyme function from sequence; however, there are no standardized benchmarks to evaluate these methods. We introduce CARE, a benchmark and dataset suite for the Classification And Retrieval of Enzymes (CARE). CARE centers on two tasks: (1) classification of a protein sequence by its enzyme commission (EC) number and (2) retrieval of an EC number given a chemical reaction. For each task, we design train-test splits to evaluate different kinds of out-of-distribution generalization that are relevant to real use cases. For the classification task, we provide baselines for state-of-the-art methods. Because the retrieval task has not been previously formalized, we propose a method called Contrastive Reaction-EnzymE Pretraining (CREEP) as one of the first baselines for this task and compare it to the recent method, CLIPZyme. CARE is available at https://github.com/jsunn-y/CARE/.

q-bio.BM↗

arXiv2023

Machine Learning for Protein Engineering

Directed evolution of proteins has been the most effective method for protein engineering. However, a new paradigm is emerging, fusing the library generation and screening approaches of traditional directed evolution with computation through the training of machine learning models on protein sequence fitness data. This chapter highlights successful applications of machine learning to protein engineering and directed evolution, organized by the improvements that have been made with respect to each step of the directed evolution cycle. Additionally, we provide an outlook for the future based on the current direction of the field, namely in the development of calibrated models and in incorporating other modalities, such as protein structure.

q-bio.BM↗

arXiv2020

Machine learning-assisted directed protein evolution with combinatorial libraries

To reduce experimental effort associated with directed protein evolution and to explore the sequence space encoded by mutating multiple positions simultaneously, we incorporate machine learning in the directed evolution workflow. Combinatorial sequence space can be quite expensive to sample experimentally, but machine learning models trained on tested variants provide a fast method for testing sequence space computationally. We validate this approach on a large published empirical fitness landscape for human GB1 binding protein, demonstrating that machine learning-guided directed evolution finds variants with higher fitness than those found by other directed evolution approaches. We then provide an example application in evolving an enzyme to produce each of the two possible product enantiomers (stereodivergence) of a new-to-nature carbene Si-H insertion reaction. The approach predicted libraries enriched in functional enzymes and fixed seven mutations in two rounds of evolution to identify variants for selective catalysis with 93% and 79% ee. By greatly increasing throughput with in silico modeling, machine learning enhances the quality and diversity of sequence solutions for a protein engineering problem.

q-bio.BM↗