arXiv subjects

Bocheng Chen

Publications and source records attributed to Bocheng Chen.

16 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Pragmatic Attack Surface: Vulnerabilities of Implicit Context in Large Language Models

In the era of large language models (LLMs), attackers often manipulate natural language to elicit unsafe or harmful outputs, creating a new natural language attack surface unique to LLM-based systems, where attacks directly exploit explicit linguistic cues in user prompts to bypass the safety mechanism of LLMs. However, such attacks can often be mitigated by existing safety alignment algorithms. On the other hand, human language is inherently grounded in pragmatics, necessitating typical context to interpret language, e.g., world knowledge, social norms. However, such contexts are often implicit because they are not directly expressed in human language and are not sufficiently leveraged in safety alignment, creating a fundamental mismatch between human language interpretation and safety alignment approaches. In this paper, we demonstrate that this mismatch exposes vulnerabilities in LLMs. We refer to this vulnerability as the pragmatic attack surface, which can be exploited to achieve high attack success rates. The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed approach outperforms baseline attack methods across various open-source and closed-source models by a substantial margin.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Can Large Language Models Handle Discourse Particles? A Case Study of Colloquial Malay

Discourse particles, such as well and kind of, are crucial components that enable LLMs to "speak" more like humans. They are used to convey emotions, intentions, and interpersonal attitudes. However, existing studies have not yet built a comprehensive understanding of LLMs' capabilities in handling discourse particles. Moreover, the limited number of research focuses primarily on high-resource languages such as English, with little attention paid to Southeast Asian languages. In this paper, we (1) propose MalayPrag, a benchmark designed to systematically evaluate and analyze LLMs' capabilities in handling discourse particles in colloquial Malay; (2) introduce five attributes that provide a theoretically grounded, unified framework for interpreting pragmatic functions of discourse particles. Applying these two, we prompt ten off-the-shelf LLMs to perform three prediction tasks. The experimental results reveal substantial challenges for current LLMs to accurately connect discourse particles and their pragmatic functions in Malay. The provision of the five attributes designed in this study is found to significantly improve the connections, highlighting the need for structured scaffolding for models' pragmatic competence.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Deactivating Refusal Triggers: Understanding and Mitigating Overrefusal in Safety Alignment

Safety alignment aims to ensure that large language models (LLMs) refuse harmful requests by post-training on harmful queries paired with refusal answers. Although safety alignment is widely adopted in industry, the overrefusal problem where aligned LLMs also reject benign queries after safety alignment post-training, remains insufficiently studied. Such an issue degrades the usability of safety alignment in real-world applications. In this paper, we examine how overrefusal arises under safety alignment, and propose a mitigation strategy inspired by our findings. We define refusal triggers as linguistic cues in the training data that elicit refusal responses, safety alignment encourages LLMs to associate refusal triggers within a training sample with refusal responses, leading aligned LLMs to refuse harmful queries. However, the refusal triggers include not only harmful linguistic cues but also non-harmful cues, therefore causing overrefusal to benign queries. Building on this mechanistic analysis, we propose a method that explicitly considers refusal triggers in the safety alignment fine-tuning. Empirical results demonstrate that our approach achieves a more favorable trade-off between defense against jailbreak attacks and responsiveness to benign queries, outperforming prior methods. Warning: this paper contains harmful and biased sentences.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Learning to Diagnose and Correct Moral Errors: Beyond Shallow Heuristics in Moral Alignment

Existing approaches to moral value alignment are primarily set out to align LLMs' generation with the distributions of morally appropriate language, which has seen good progress. However, these approaches are often brittle, heavily rely on shallow heuristics, and reduce performance in out-of-the-distribution tasks. In other words, the learning paradigm underlying existing approaches teaches LLMs what morally (in)appropriate language looks like, but not why it is morally (in)appropriate. In this paper, we address this challenge by developing pragmatic inference-driven methods to facilitate LLMs' learning of how to diagnose and correct moral errors, thereby enabling them to generate morally appropriate language. Pragmatic inference is the reasoning process of deriving (implied) meanings -- a famous concept in linguistics. Our methods vary the inference procedures by the inferential load of different moral discourses, rather than modelling their diverse and complex semantic distributions separately. Empirical results demonstrate that our approach improves moral value alignment in LLMs and generalizes effectively across tasks.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

From Training to Generalization: Improving Moral Reasoning Through Pragmatic Inference

Although moral reasoning has emerged as a promising research direction for large language models (LLMs), a persistent generalization challenge remains: LLMs often achieve strong performance on training data but struggle to generalize their moral reasoning to unseen test data. From a linguistic perspective, moral reasoning is a pragmatic process in which moral judgments are inferred based on the context of social norms underlying a given moral situation. However, existing approaches overlook this pragmatic nature because of two major bottlenecks: (1) LLMs are primarily skilled in capturing distributional semantics, which differs from the pragmatic nature of moral reasoning; (2) there is currently no effective solution for grounding language in the moral context. In this paper, we develop a pragmatic inference approach that enables LLMs to infer moral judgments for a given moral situation by combining metapragmatic links with Moral Foundations Theory. Specifically, metapragmatic links serve to bridge the gap between distributional semantics and pragmatics, whereas Moral Foundations Theory provides a principled basis for grounding language in moral contexts. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach substantially improves LLMs' generalization in moral reasoning, highlighting the potential of pragmatic inference for future moral reasoning research.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Diagnosing the Performance Trade-off in Moral Alignment: A Case Study on Gender Stereotypes

Moral alignment has emerged as a widely adopted approach for regulating the behavior of pretrained language models (PLMs), typically through fine-tuning on curated datasets. Gender stereotype mitigation is a representational task within the broader application of moral alignment. However, this process often comes at the cost of degraded downstream task performance. Prior studies commonly aim to achieve a performance trade-off by encouraging PLMs to selectively forget only stereotypical knowledge through carefully designed fairness objective, while preserving their language modeling capability (overall forgetting). In this short paper, we investigate whether the performance trade-off can be achieved through the lens of forgetting and the fairness objective. Our analysis shows that the large datasets needed for satisfactory fairness highlight the limitations of current fairness objectives in achieving an effective trade-off: (1) downstream task performance is strongly correlated with overall forgetting; (2) selective forgetting reduces stereotypes, but overall forgetting increases. and (3) general solutions for alleviating forgetting are ineffective at reducing the overall forgetting and fail to improve downstream task performance.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

ClearMask: Noise-Free and Naturalness-Preserving Protection Against Voice Deepfake Attacks

Voice deepfake attacks, which artificially impersonate human speech for malicious purposes, have emerged as a severe threat. Existing defenses typically inject noise into human speech to compromise voice encoders in speech synthesis models. However, these methods degrade audio quality and require prior knowledge of the attack approaches, limiting their effectiveness in diverse scenarios. Moreover, real-time audios, such as speech in virtual meetings and voice messages, are still exposed to voice deepfake threats. To overcome these limitations, we propose ClearMask, a noise-free defense mechanism against voice deepfake attacks. Unlike traditional approaches, ClearMask modifies the audio mel-spectrogram by selectively filtering certain frequencies, inducing a transferable voice feature loss without injecting noise. We then apply audio style transfer to further deceive voice decoders while preserving perceived sound quality. Finally, optimized reverberation is introduced to disrupt the output of voice generation models without affecting the naturalness of the speech. Additionally, we develop LiveMask to protect streaming speech in real-time through a universal frequency filter and reverberation generator. Our experimental results show that ClearMask and LiveMask effectively prevent voice deepfake attacks from deceiving speaker verification models and human listeners, even for unseen voice synthesis models and black-box API services. Furthermore, ClearMask demonstrates resilience against adaptive attackers who attempt to recover the original audio signal from the protected speech samples.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2024

No Free Lunch for Defending Against Prefilling Attack by In-Context Learning

The security of Large Language Models (LLMs) has become an important research topic since the emergence of ChatGPT. Though there have been various effective methods to defend against jailbreak attacks, prefilling attacks remain an unsolved and popular threat against open-sourced LLMs. In-Context Learning (ICL) offers a computationally efficient defense against various jailbreak attacks, yet no effective ICL methods have been developed to counter prefilling attacks. In this paper, we: (1) show that ICL can effectively defend against prefilling jailbreak attacks by employing adversative sentence structures within demonstrations; (2) characterize the effectiveness of this defense through the lens of model size, number of demonstrations, over-defense, integration with other jailbreak attacks, and the presence of safety alignment. Given the experimental results and our analysis, we conclude that there is no free lunch for defending against prefilling jailbreak attacks with ICL. On the one hand, current safety alignment methods fail to mitigate prefilling jailbreak attacks, but adversative structures within ICL demonstrations provide robust defense across various model sizes and complex jailbreak attacks. On the other hand, LLMs exhibit similar over-defensiveness when utilizing ICL demonstrations with adversative structures, and this behavior appears to be independent of model size.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2024

Protecting Activity Sensing Data Privacy Using Hierarchical Information Dissociation

Smartphones and wearable devices have been integrated into our daily lives, offering personalized services. However, many apps become overprivileged as their collected sensing data contains unnecessary sensitive information. For example, mobile sensing data could reveal private attributes (e.g., gender and age) and unintended sensitive features (e.g., hand gestures when entering passwords). To prevent sensitive information leakage, existing methods must obtain private labels and users need to specify privacy policies. However, they only achieve limited control over information disclosure. In this work, we present Hippo to dissociate hierarchical information including private metadata and multi-grained activity information from the sensing data. Hippo achieves fine-grained control over the disclosure of sensitive information without requiring private labels. Specifically, we design a latent guidance-based diffusion model, which generates multi-grained versions of raw sensor data conditioned on hierarchical latent activity features. Hippo enables users to control the disclosure of sensitive information in sensing data, ensuring their privacy while preserving the necessary features to meet the utility requirements of applications. Hippo is the first unified model that achieves two goals: perturbing the sensitive attributes and controlling the disclosure of sensitive information in mobile sensing data. Extensive experiments show that Hippo can anonymize personal attributes and transform activity information at various resolutions across different types of sensing data.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2024

The Dark Side of Human Feedback: Poisoning Large Language Models via User Inputs

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated great capabilities in natural language understanding and generation, largely attributed to the intricate alignment process using human feedback. While alignment has become an essential training component that leverages data collected from user queries, it inadvertently opens up an avenue for a new type of user-guided poisoning attacks. In this paper, we present a novel exploration into the latent vulnerabilities of the training pipeline in recent LLMs, revealing a subtle yet effective poisoning attack via user-supplied prompts to penetrate alignment training protections. Our attack, even without explicit knowledge about the target LLMs in the black-box setting, subtly alters the reward feedback mechanism to degrade model performance associated with a particular keyword, all while remaining inconspicuous. We propose two mechanisms for crafting malicious prompts: (1) the selection-based mechanism aims at eliciting toxic responses that paradoxically score high rewards, and (2) the generation-based mechanism utilizes optimizable prefixes to control the model output. By injecting 1\% of these specially crafted prompts into the data, through malicious users, we demonstrate a toxicity score up to two times higher when a specific trigger word is used. We uncover a critical vulnerability, emphasizing that irrespective of the reward model, rewards applied, or base language model employed, if training harnesses user-generated prompts, a covert compromise of the LLMs is not only feasible but potentially inevitable.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

Beyond Boundaries: A Comprehensive Survey of Transferable Attacks on AI Systems

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems increasingly underpin critical applications, from autonomous vehicles to biometric authentication, their vulnerability to transferable attacks presents a growing concern. These attacks, designed to generalize across instances, domains, models, tasks, modalities, or even hardware platforms, pose severe risks to security, privacy, and system integrity. This survey delivers the first comprehensive review of transferable attacks across seven major categories, including evasion, backdoor, data poisoning, model stealing, model inversion, membership inference, and side-channel attacks. We introduce a unified six-dimensional taxonomy: cross-instance, cross-domain, cross-modality, cross-model, cross-task, and cross-hardware, which systematically captures the diverse transfer pathways of adversarial strategies. Through this framework, we examine both the underlying mechanics and practical implications of transferable attacks on AI systems. Furthermore, we review cutting-edge methods for enhancing attack transferability, organized around data augmentation and optimization strategies. By consolidating fragmented research and identifying critical future directions, this work provides a foundational roadmap for understanding, evaluating, and defending against transferable threats in real-world AI systems.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2023

Jailbreaker in Jail: Moving Target Defense for Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs), known for their capability in understanding and following instructions, are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Researchers have found that current commercial LLMs either fail to be "harmless" by presenting unethical answers, or fail to be "helpful" by refusing to offer meaningful answers when faced with adversarial queries. To strike a balance between being helpful and harmless, we design a moving target defense (MTD) enhanced LLM system. The system aims to deliver non-toxic answers that align with outputs from multiple model candidates, making them more robust against adversarial attacks. We design a query and output analysis model to filter out unsafe or non-responsive answers. %to achieve the two objectives of randomly selecting outputs from different LLMs. We evaluate over 8 most recent chatbot models with state-of-the-art adversarial queries. Our MTD-enhanced LLM system reduces the attack success rate from 37.5\% to 0\%. Meanwhile, it decreases the response refusal rate from 50\% to 0\%.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2023

PhantomSound: Black-Box, Query-Efficient Audio Adversarial Attack via Split-Second Phoneme Injection

In this paper, we propose PhantomSound, a query-efficient black-box attack toward voice assistants. Existing black-box adversarial attacks on voice assistants either apply substitution models or leverage the intermediate model output to estimate the gradients for crafting adversarial audio samples. However, these attack approaches require a significant amount of queries with a lengthy training stage. PhantomSound leverages the decision-based attack to produce effective adversarial audios, and reduces the number of queries by optimizing the gradient estimation. In the experiments, we perform our attack against 4 different speech-to-text APIs under 3 real-world scenarios to demonstrate the real-time attack impact. The results show that PhantomSound is practical and robust in attacking 5 popular commercial voice controllable devices over the air, and is able to bypass 3 liveness detection mechanisms with >95% success rate. The benchmark result shows that PhantomSound can generate adversarial examples and launch the attack in a few minutes. We significantly enhance the query efficiency and reduce the cost of a successful untargeted and targeted adversarial attack by 93.1% and 65.5% compared with the state-of-the-art black-box attacks, using merely ~300 queries (~5 minutes) and ~1,500 queries (~25 minutes), respectively.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2023

DynamicFL: Balancing Communication Dynamics and Client Manipulation for Federated Learning

Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning (ML) paradigm, aiming to train a global model by exploiting the decentralized data across millions of edge devices. Compared with centralized learning, FL preserves the clients' privacy by refraining from explicitly downloading their data. However, given the geo-distributed edge devices (e.g., mobile, car, train, or subway) with highly dynamic networks in the wild, aggregating all the model updates from those participating devices will result in inevitable long-tail delays in FL. This will significantly degrade the efficiency of the training process. To resolve the high system heterogeneity in time-sensitive FL scenarios, we propose a novel FL framework, DynamicFL, by considering the communication dynamics and data quality across massive edge devices with a specially designed client manipulation strategy. \ours actively selects clients for model updating based on the network prediction from its dynamic network conditions and the quality of its training data. Additionally, our long-term greedy strategy in client selection tackles the problem of system performance degradation caused by short-term scheduling in a dynamic network. Lastly, to balance the trade-off between client performance evaluation and client manipulation granularity, we dynamically adjust the length of the observation window in the training process to optimize the long-term system efficiency. Compared with the state-of-the-art client selection scheme in FL, \ours can achieve a better model accuracy while consuming only 18.9\% -- 84.0\% of the wall-clock time. Our component-wise and sensitivity studies further demonstrate the robustness of \ours under various real-life scenarios.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2023

Understanding Multi-Turn Toxic Behaviors in Open-Domain Chatbots

Recent advances in natural language processing and machine learning have led to the development of chatbot models, such as ChatGPT, that can engage in conversational dialogue with human users. However, the ability of these models to generate toxic or harmful responses during a non-toxic multi-turn conversation remains an open research question. Existing research focuses on single-turn sentence testing, while we find that 82\% of the individual non-toxic sentences that elicit toxic behaviors in a conversation are considered safe by existing tools. In this paper, we design a new attack, \toxicbot, by fine-tuning a chatbot to engage in conversation with a target open-domain chatbot. The chatbot is fine-tuned with a collection of crafted conversation sequences. Particularly, each conversation begins with a sentence from a crafted prompt sentences dataset. Our extensive evaluation shows that open-domain chatbot models can be triggered to generate toxic responses in a multi-turn conversation. In the best scenario, \toxicbot achieves a 67\% activation rate. The conversation sequences in the fine-tuning stage help trigger the toxicity in a conversation, which allows the attack to bypass two defense methods. Our findings suggest that further research is needed to address chatbot toxicity in a dynamic interactive environment. The proposed \toxicbot can be used by both industry and researchers to develop methods for detecting and mitigating toxic responses in conversational dialogue and improve the robustness of chatbots for end users.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2023

VSMask: Defending Against Voice Synthesis Attack via Real-Time Predictive Perturbation

Deep learning based voice synthesis technology generates artificial human-like speeches, which has been used in deepfakes or identity theft attacks. Existing defense mechanisms inject subtle adversarial perturbations into the raw speech audios to mislead the voice synthesis models. However, optimizing the adversarial perturbation not only consumes substantial computation time, but it also requires the availability of entire speech. Therefore, they are not suitable for protecting live speech streams, such as voice messages or online meetings. In this paper, we propose VSMask, a real-time protection mechanism against voice synthesis attacks. Different from offline protection schemes, VSMask leverages a predictive neural network to forecast the most effective perturbation for the upcoming streaming speech. VSMask introduces a universal perturbation tailored for arbitrary speech input to shield a real-time speech in its entirety. To minimize the audio distortion within the protected speech, we implement a weight-based perturbation constraint to reduce the perceptibility of the added perturbation. We comprehensively evaluate VSMask protection performance under different scenarios. The experimental results indicate that VSMask can effectively defend against 3 popular voice synthesis models. None of the synthetic voice could deceive the speaker verification models or human ears with VSMask protection. In a physical world experiment, we demonstrate that VSMask successfully safeguards the real-time speech by injecting the perturbation over the air.

cs.SD↗