arXiv subjects

Bingyi Han

Publications and source records attributed to Bingyi Han.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

AI Sensing and Intervention in Higher Education: Student Perceptions of Learning Impacts, Affective Responses, and Ethical Priorities

AI technologies that sense student attention and emotions to enable more personalised teaching interventions are increasingly promoted, but raise pressing questions about student learning, well-being, and ethics. In particular, students' perspectives about AI sensing-intervention in learning are often overlooked. We conducted an online mixed-method experiment with Australian university students (N=132), presenting video scenarios varying by whether sensing was used (in-use vs. not-in-use), sensing modality (gaze-based attention detection vs. facial-based emotion detection), and intervention (by digital device vs. teacher). Participants also completed pairwise ranking tasks to prioritise six core ethical concerns. Findings revealed that students valued targeted intervention but responded negatively to AI monitoring, regardless of sensing methods. Students preferred system-generated hints over teacher-initiated assistance, citing learning agency and social embarrassment concerns. Students' ethical considerations prioritised autonomy and privacy, followed by transparency, accuracy, fairness, and learning beneficence. We advocate designing customisable, social-sensitive, non-intrusive systems that preserve student control, agency, and well-being.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

From Bias Mitigation to Bias Negotiation: Governing Identity and Sociocultural Reasoning in Generative AI

LLMs act in the social world by drawing upon shared cultural patterns to make social situations understandable and actionable. Because identity is often part of the inferential substrate of competent judgment, ethical alignment requires regulating when and how systems invoke identity. Yet the dominant governance regime for identity-related harm remains bias mitigation, which treats identity primarily as a source of measurable disparities or harmful associations to be detected and suppressed. This leaves underspecified a positive, context-sensitive role for identity in interpretation. We call this governance problem bias negotiation: the normative regulation of identity-conditioned judgments of sociocultural relevance, inference, and justification. Empirically, we probe the feasibility of bias negotiation through semi-structured interviews with multiple publicly deployed chatbots. We identify recurring repertoires for negotiating identity including probabilistic framing of group tendencies and harm-value balancing. We also observe failure modes in which models avoid hard tradeoffs or apply principles inconsistently. Bias negotiation matters for justice because a positive role for sociocultural reasoning is required to recognize and potentially remediate structural inequities. But it is equally implicated in core model functionality as sociocultural competence is needed for systems that operate across heterogeneous cultural contexts. Because bias negotiation is a procedural capability expressed through deliberation and interaction, it cannot be validated by static benchmarks alone. To support targeted training, we introduce a broad but explicit framework that decomposes bias negotiation into an action space of negotiation moves (what to observe and score) and a complementary set of case features (over which the model negotiates), enabling systematic test-suite design and evaluation.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2024

Who is Helping Whom? Student Concerns about AI- Teacher Collaboration in Higher Education Classrooms

AI's integration into education promises to equip teachers with data-driven insights and intervene in student learning. Despite the intended advancements, there is a lack of understanding of interactions and emerging dynamics in classrooms where various stakeholders including teachers, students, and AI, collaborate. This paper aims to understand how students perceive the implications of AI in Education in terms of classroom collaborative dynamics, especially AI used to observe students and notify teachers to provide targeted help. Using the story completion method, we analyzed narratives from 65 participants, highlighting three challenges: AI decontextualizing of the educational context; AI-teacher cooperation with bias concerns and power disparities; and AI's impact on student behavior that further challenges AI's effectiveness. We argue that for effective and ethical AI-facilitated cooperative education, future AIEd design must factor in the situated nature of implementation. Designers must consider the broader nuances of the education context, impacts on multiple stakeholders, dynamics involving these stakeholders, and the interplay among potential consequences for AI systems and stakeholders. It is crucial to understand the values in the situated context, the capacity and limitations of both AI and humans for effective cooperation, and any implications to the relevant ecosystem.

cs.CY↗