arXiv subjects

Benjamin Piwowarski

Publications and source records attributed to Benjamin Piwowarski.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Give it Space! Explicit Disentangling of Positional and Semantic Representations in Encoders

Positional encoding (PE) underpins how permutation-invariant Transformers represent sequence order, yet how positional information is processed and stored remains poorly understood. Modern PE methods such as RoPE still struggle on tasks such as long-context understanding or retrieval \cite{chen-etal-2025-hope}. Hence, a better understanding of the internal positional mechanism could help design better PE. Building on evidence that positional and semantic signals occupy nearly orthogonal subspaces in trained Transformers, we modify an encoder Transformer to process three explicitly disentangled streams: semantic, absolute positional (AP) and relative positional (RP), and confine the masked-language-modeling (MLM) objective to the semantic stream. This decoupling enables a clean mechanistic study and yields three take-aways. (1) The isolated AP subspace spontaneously collapses into a low-frequency two-dimensional manifold that captures the structure of the document; (2) Attention heads specialize into structure and semantic-oriented groups, with RP exclusively supporting the latter; (3) Standard positional encodings do not robustly retain macroscopic structure: RoPE and RP only weakly encode it, and entangled AP loses it in the final layers under MLM pressure. The disentangled approach preserves positional encoding, which improves linguistic representation on 49 of the 65 linguistic phenomena of the Flash-Holmes probing benchmark.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

MICE: Minimal Interaction Cross-Encoders for efficient Re-ranking

In Information Retrieval (IR), cross-encoders deliver state-of-the-art ranking effectiveness but have a high inference cost, limiting their use to second-stage re-rankers. Prior work has addressed this bottleneck from two largely separate directions: accelerating cross-encoder inference through attention sparsification, or improving first-stage retrieval effectiveness to alleviate the need of a re-ranker, using more complex models, e.g. late-interactions. In this work, we bridge these two directions through an in-depth analysis of cross-encoder internal mechanisms. By identifying and removing superfluous interactions, we derive MICE (Minimal Interaction Cross-Encoders), a new cross-encoder architecture that retains effectiveness while reducing computational overhead. Extensive evaluations show MICE retains most of the performances of its cross-encoder counterparts in-domain and matches or even exceeds it in out-of-domain, while reducing FLOPs down to 2.5 times.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

Building Better Encoder-only Cross-Encoders: A Controlled Study of Training Strategies for Neural Re-ranking

Cross-encoders fine-tuned from Transformer backbones remain the standard for second-stage re-ranking, and recent knowledge-distillation strategies have closed much of the gap with LLM re-rankers. However, these strategies have not been compared under controlled conditions. In particular, it remains unclear how distillation from LLM rankers compares to distillation from strong cross-encoder teachers, or to purely supervised objectives. It is also unclear how much newer backbones (RoBERTa, ELECTRA, DeBERTaV3, ModernBERT) contribute compared to the original BERT. We run 162 controlled training runs (9 backbones x 6 objectives x 3 seeds), spanning pointwise, pairwise, and listwise losses with both human labels and two distillation signals, and evaluate on TREC-DL, MSMARCO dev, BEIR, LoTTE, and Robust04. We find that objectives emphasizing relative comparisons - pairwise MarginMSE and listwise InfoNCE - consistently outperform alternative objectives, including more complex listwise LLM distillation, across all backbones, and switching objective yields gains comparable to moving up one backbone size tier. A controlled disentanglement further shows that, once the negative-sampling pool is matched, even a simple pairwise Hinge loss with ColBERTv2 hard negatives matches - and on out of domain beats - listwise LLM distillation, indicating that the quality of the negatives is at least as important as the choice of loss. We release all 162 trained models on HuggingFace (https://huggingface.co/collections/xpmir/reproducing-cross-encoders) and a unified training codebase. (https://github.com/xpmir/cross-encoders)

cs.IR↗