arXiv subjects

Aviad Rubinstein

Publications and source records attributed to Aviad Rubinstein.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Approximately Efficient Multidimensional Bilateral Trade

A central challenge in mechanism design is to develop truthful trade mechanisms that maximize the expected gains-from-trade (GFT) in two-sided markets. Because achieving the full GFT is generally impossible, the literature has focused on constant-factor approximations---a notoriously difficult problem even in simple settings. It was only recently that a breakthrough result by [DMSW22] achieved a constant-factor approximation for single-item bilateral trade. The same guarantee was later extended to single-dimensional matching markets with general downward-closed constraints [BRTW26]. Most existing results, however, are limited to single-dimensional agents. A notable multi-dimensional exception is [CGMZ21]. They considered a market with one constrained-additive buyer and $n$ single-dimensional sellers and provided a mechanism that achieves a $\log^2(n)$ approximation to the second-best GFT, i.e., the maximum expected GFT theoretically achievable by any mechanism satisfying Bayesian Incentive Compatibility (BIC), Interim Individual Rationality (IIR), and ex-ante Weak Budget Balance (WBB). In this paper, we study multi-dimensional bilateral trade problem where both sides of the market are multi-dimensional. We start with one buyer with XOS valuation and one seller with an additive cost function. We then generalize to a market with $n$ XOS buyers and one additive seller. Assuming independent items' values and costs, in both settings we propose simple mechanisms that are BIC, IIR, and ex-ante WBB, while achieving a constant fraction of the optimal (first-best) expected GFT.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Welfare Approximation in Multilateral Trade

We introduce the study of \emph{multilateral trade}: a mechanism-design problem in which a single potential trade involves $k$ agents and can be executed only if all $k$ agents agree to participate. The classical case $k=2$ is the well-studied bilateral trade problem, where a seller and a buyer with private values must decide whether to trade an item initially held by the seller. Existing extensions of bilateral trade have largely focused on markets with many buyers and many sellers, but where each realized transaction is still bilateral, requiring agreement only between the matched buyer and seller. Our formulation captures settings in which the trade itself requires joint participation, coupling the agents' incentives and creating new challenges. We study welfare approximation in this setting under incentive compatibility, individual rationality, and budget balance. We give a DSIC mechanism with approximation ratio $O(k^2)$, and a BIC mechanism with approximation ratio $\widetilde O(k^{3/2})$. We prove matching lower bounds up to polylogarithmic factors. Finally, we extend the model to an $\ell$-out-of-$k$ partial-agreement setting, where the trade may occur once at least $\ell$ agents participate. In this relaxed model, the welfare guarantees improve smoothly as $k-\ell$, the number of agents whose participation is not required, grows, and we obtain matching upper and lower bounds up to polylogarithmic factors.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Single-Item Auctions with a Monopolist Intermediary

Classical optimal auction theory assumes that bids reach the seller directly. We study how this picture changes when a revenue-maximizing intermediary controls access to the seller's auction. Motivated by blockchain auctions, online platforms, and other intermediated markets, we consider a single-item auction with independent private values and a monopolist intermediary who can decide which bidder messages are forwarded to the seller. We establish approximation guarantees and impossibility results across three timing models: seller-first, intermediary-first, and simultaneous. In the seller-first model, arbitrary deterministic seller mechanisms collapse to posted-price mechanisms, and the intermediary's best response is a shifted Myerson auction. This yields a sharp separation: for regular distributions, the seller's revenue can be arbitrarily small relative to the no-intermediary optimum, while for $α$-strongly regular distributions, posted prices recover a constant fraction of the optimum with a tight dependence on $α$. We further show that timing matters: neither Stackelberg order uniformly dominates, and simultaneous play can leave both parties unboundedly worse off than in either sequential model.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Secretary, Prophet, and Stochastic Probing via Big-Decisions-First

We revisit three fundamental problems in algorithms under uncertainty: the Secretary Problem, Prophet Inequality, and Stochastic Probing, each subject to general downward-closed constraints. When elements have binary values, all three problems admit a tight $\tildeΘ(\log n)$-factor approximation guarantee. For general (non-binary) values, however, the best known algorithms lose an additional $\log n$ factor when discretizing to binary values, leaving a quadratic gap of $\tildeΘ(\log n)$ vs. $\tildeΘ(\log^2 n)$. We resolve this quadratic gap for all three problems, showing $\tildeΩ(\log^2 n)$-hardness for two of them and an $O(\log n)$-approximation algorithm for the third. While the technical details differ across settings, and between algorithmic and hardness proofs, all our results stem from a single core observation, which we call the Big-Decisions-First Principle: Under uncertainty, it is better to resolve high-stakes (large-value) decisions early.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Approximation Schemes for Edit Distance and LCS in Quasi-Strongly Subquadratic Time

We present novel randomized approximation schemes for the Edit Distance (ED) problem and the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) problem that, for any constant $ε>0$, compute a $(1+ε)$-approximation for ED and a $(1-ε)$-approximation for LCS in time $n^2 / 2^{\log^{Ω(1)}(n)}$ for two strings of total length at most $n$. This running time improves upon the classical quadratic-time dynamic programming algorithms by a quasi-polynomial factor. Our results yield significant insights into fine-grained complexity: Firstly, for ED, prior work indicates that any exact algorithm cannot be improved beyond a few logarithmic factors without refuting established complexity assumptions [Abboud, Hansen, Vassilevska Williams, Williams, 2016]; our quasi-polynomial speed-up shows a separation the complexity of approximate ED from that of exact ED, even for approximation factor arbitrarily close to $1$. Secondly, for LCS, obtaining similar approximation-time tradeoffs via deterministic algorithms would imply breakthrough circuit lower bounds [Chen, Goldwasser, Lyu, Rothblum, Rubinstein, 2019]; our randomized algorithm demonstrates derandomization hardness for LCS approximation.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Approximating Gains-from-Trade in Matching Markets

A central challenge in mechanism design is to develop truthful trade mechanisms that maximize the expected gains-from-trade (GFT) in two-sided markets with strategic agents. As achieving the full GFT is generally impossible, much of the literature has focused on constant-factor approximations. Existing results, however, are limited to the highly structured settings of bilateral trade and double auctions, in which every buyer can trade with every seller. We consider the significantly more general setting of two-sided matching markets with arbitrary downward-closed constraints on the family of allowed matchings. For this setting, we present a simple randomized truthful mechanism that guarantees a constant-factor approximation to the optimal expected GFT. This result also resolves an open problem posed by Cai, Goldner, Ma, and Zhao (2021).

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

When Contracts Get Complex: Information-Theoretic Barriers

In the combinatorial-action contract model (Dütting et al., FOCS'21) a principal delegates the execution of a complex project to an agent, who can choose any subset from a given set of actions. Each set of actions incurs a cost to the agent, given by a set function $c$, and induces an expected reward to the principal, given by a set function $f$. To incentivize the agent, the principal designs a contract that specifies the payment upon success, with the optimal contract being the one that maximizes the principal's utility. It is known that with access to value queries no constant-approximation is possible for submodular $f$ and additive $c$. A fundamental open problem is: does the problem become tractable with demand queries? We answer this question to the negative, by establishing that finding an optimal contract for submodular $f$ and additive $c$ requires exponentially many demand queries. We leverage the robustness of our techniques to extend and strengthen this result to different combinations of submodular/supermodular $f$ and $c$; while allowing the principal to access $f$ and $c$ using arbitrary communication protocols. Our results are driven by novel equal-revenue constructions when one of the functions is additive, immediately implying value query hardness. We then identify a new property -- sparse demand -- which allows us to strengthen these results to demand query hardness. Finally, by augmenting a perturbed version of these constructions with one additional action, thereby making both functions combinatorial, we establish exponential communication complexity.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Tight Pair Query Lower Bounds for Matching and Earth Mover's Distance

How many adjacency matrix queries (also known as pair queries) are required to estimate the size of a maximum matching in an $n$-vertex graph $G$? We study this fundamental question in this paper. On the upper bound side, an algorithm of Bhattacharya, Kiss, and Saranurak [FOCS'23] gives an estimate that is within $εn$ of the right bound with $n^{2-Ω_ε(1)}$ queries, which is subquadratic in $n$ (and thus sublinear in the matrix size) for any fixed $ε> 0$. On the lower bound side, while there has been a lot of progress in the adjacency list model, no non-trivial lower bound has been established for algorithms with adjacency matrix query access. In particular, the only known lower bound is a folklore bound of $Ω(n)$, leaving a huge gap. In this paper, we present the first superlinear in $n$ lower bound for this problem. In fact, we close the gap mentioned above entirely by showing that the algorithm of [BKS'23] is optimal. Formally, we prove that for any fixed $δ> 0$, there is a fixed $ε> 0$ such that an estimate that is within $εn$ of the true bound requires $Ω(n^{2-δ})$ adjacency matrix queries. Our lower bound also has strong implications for estimating the earth mover's distance between distributions. For this problem, Beretta and Rubinstein [STOC'24] gave an $n^{2-Ω_ε(1)}$ time algorithm that obtains an additive $ε$-approximation and works for any distance function. Whether this can be improved generally, or even for metric spaces, had remained open. Our lower bound rules out the possibility of any improvements over this bound, even under the strong assumption that the underlying distances are in a (1, 2)-metric.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

A shared-revenue Bertrand game

We introduce and analyze a variation of the Bertrand game in which the revenue is shared between two players. This game models situations in which one economic agent can provide goods/services to consumers either directly or through an independent seller/contractor in return for a share of the revenue. We analyze the equilibria of this game, and show how they can predict different business outcomes as a function of the players' costs and the transferred revenue shares. Importantly, we identify game parameters for which independent sellers can simultaneously increase the original player's payoff while increasing consumer surplus. We then extend the shared-revenue Bertrand game by considering the shared revenue proportion as an action and giving the independent seller an outside option to sell elsewhere. This work constitutes a first step towards a general theory for how partnership and sharing of resources between economic agents can lead to more efficient markets and improve the outcomes of both agents as well as consumers.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2025

Optimal Single-Choice Prophet Inequalities from Samples

We study the single-choice Prophet Inequality problem when the gambler is given access to samples. We show that the optimal competitive ratio of $1/2$ can be achieved with a single sample from each distribution. When the distributions are identical, we show that for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, $O(n)$ samples from the distribution suffice to achieve the optimal competitive ratio ($\approx 0.745$) within $(1+\varepsilon)$, resolving an open problem of Correa, Dütting, Fischer, and Schewior.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Can Almost Everybody be Almost Happy? PCP for PPAD and the Inapproximability of Nash

We conjecture that PPAD has a PCP-like complete problem, seeking a near equilibrium in which all but very few players have very little incentive to deviate. We show that, if one assumes that this problem requires exponential time, several open problems in this area are settled. The most important implication, proved via a "birthday repetition" reduction, is that the n^O(log n) approximation scheme of [LMM03] for the Nash equilibrium of two-player games is essentially optimum. Two other open problems in the area are resolved once one assumes this conjecture, establishing that certain approximate equilibria are PPAD-complete: Finding a relative approximation of two-player Nash equilibria (without the well-supported restriction of [Das13]), and an approximate competitive equilibrium with equal incomes [Bud11] with small clearing error and near-optimal Gini coefficient.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Envy-Free Cake-Cutting for Four Agents

In the envy-free cake-cutting problem we are given a resource, usually called a cake and represented as the $[0,1]$ interval, and a set of $n$ agents with heterogeneous preferences over pieces of the cake. The goal is to divide the cake among the $n$ agents such that no agent is envious of any other agent. Even under a very general preferences model, this fundamental fair division problem is known to always admit an exact solution where each agent obtains a connected piece of the cake; we study the complexity of finding an approximate solution, i.e., a connected $\varepsilon$-envy-free allocation. For monotone valuations of cake pieces, Deng, Qi, and Saberi (2012) gave an efficient ($\textsf{poly}(\log(1/\varepsilon))$ queries) algorithm for three agents and posed the open problem of four (or more) monotone agents. Even for the special case of additive valuations, Brânzei and Nisan (2022) conjectured an $Ω(1/\varepsilon)$ lower bound on the number of queries for four agents. We provide the first efficient algorithm for finding a connected $\varepsilon$-envy-free allocation with four monotone agents. We also prove that as soon as valuations are allowed to be non-monotone, the problem becomes hard: it becomes PPAD-hard, requires $\textsf{poly}(1/\varepsilon)$ queries in the black-box model, and even $\textsf{poly}(1/\varepsilon)$ communication complexity. This constitutes, to the best of our knowledge, the first intractability result for any version of the cake-cutting problem in the communication complexity model.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Quantum Communication Complexity of Classical Auctions

We study the fundamental, classical mechanism design problem of single-buyer multi-item Bayesian revenue-maximizing auctions under the lens of communication complexity between the buyer and the seller. Specifically, we ask whether using quantum communication can be more efficient than classical communication. We have two sets of results, revealing a surprisingly rich landscape - which looks quite different from both quantum communication in non-strategic parties, and classical communication in mechanism design. We first study the expected communication complexity of approximately optimal auctions. We give quantum auction protocols for buyers with unit-demand or combinatorial valuations that obtain an arbitrarily good approximation of the optimal revenue while running in exponentially more efficient communication compared to classical approximately optimal auctions. However, these auctions come with the caveat that they may require the seller to charge exponentially large payments from a deviating buyer. We show that this caveat is necessary - we give an exponential lower bound on the product of the expected quantum communication and the maximum payment. We then study the worst-case communication complexity of exactly optimal auctions in an extremely simple setting: additive buyer's valuations over two items. We show the following separations: 1. There exists a prior where the optimal classical auction protocol requires infinitely many bits, but a one-way message of 1 qubit and 2 classical bits suffices. 2. There exists a prior where no finite one-way quantum auction protocol can obtain the optimal revenue. However, there is a barely-interactive revenue-optimal quantum auction protocol. 3. There exists a prior where no multi-round quantum auction protocol with a finite bound on communication complexity can obtain the optimal revenue.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

A Bicriterion Concentration Inequality and Prophet Inequalities for $k$-Fold Matroid Unions

We investigate prophet inequalities with competitive ratios approaching $1$, seeking to generalize $k$-uniform matroids. We first show that large girth does not suffice: for all $k$, there exists a matroid of girth $\geq k$ and a prophet inequality instance on that matroid whose optimal competitive ratio is $\frac{1}{2}$. Next, we show $k$-fold matroid unions do suffice: we provide a prophet inequality with competitive ratio $1-O(\sqrt{\frac{\log k}{k}})$ for any $k$-fold matroid union. Our prophet inequality follows from an online contention resolution scheme. The key technical ingredient in our online contention resolution scheme is a novel bicriterion concentration inequality for arbitrary monotone $1$-Lipschitz functions over independent items which may be of independent interest. Applied to our particular setting, our bicriterion concentration inequality yields "Chernoff-strength" concentration for a $1$-Lipschitz function that is not (approximately) self-bounding.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Hardness of Approximate Sperner and Applications to Envy-Free Cake Cutting

Given a so called ''Sperner coloring'' of a triangulation of the $D$-dimensional simplex, Sperner's lemma guarantees the existence of a rainbow simplex, i.e. a simplex colored by all $D+1$ colors. However, finding a rainbow simplex was the first problem to be proven $\mathsf{PPAD}$-complete in Papadimitriou's classical paper introducing the class $\mathsf{PPAD}$ (1994). In this paper, we prove that the problem does not become easier if we relax ''all $D+1$ colors'' to allow some fraction of missing colors: in fact, for any constant $D$, finding even a simplex with just three colors remains $\mathsf{PPAD}$-complete! Our result has an interesting application for the envy-free cake cutting from fair division. It is known that if agents value pieces of cake using general continuous functions satisfying a simple boundary condition (''a non-empty piece is better than an empty piece of cake''), there exists an envy-free allocation with connected pieces. We show that for any constant number of agents it is $\mathsf{PPAD}$-complete to find an allocation -- even using any constant number of possibly disconnected pieces -- that makes just three agents envy-free. Our results extend to super-constant dimension, number of agents, and number of pieces, as long as they are asymptotically bounded by any $\log^{1-Ω(1)}(ε)$, where $ε$ is the precision parameter (side length for Sperner and approximate envy-free for cake cutting).

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Beyond matroids: Secretary Problem and Prophet Inequality with general constraints

We study generalizations of the "Prophet Inequality" and "Secretary Problem", where the algorithm is restricted to an arbitrary downward-closed set system. For {0,1}-values, we give O(log n)-competitive algorithms for both problems. This is close to the Ω(log n / loglog n) lower bound due to Babaioff, Immorlica, and Kleinberg. For general values, our results translate to O(log n log r)-competitive algorithms, where r is the cardinality of the largest feasible set. This resolves (up to the O(log r loglog n) factors) an open question posed to us by Bobby Kleinberg.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Parallel Sampling via Counting

We show how to use parallelization to speed up sampling from an arbitrary distribution $μ$ on a product space $[q]^n$, given oracle access to counting queries: $\mathbb{P}_{X\sim μ}[X_S=σ_S]$ for any $S\subseteq [n]$ and $σ_S \in [q]^S$. Our algorithm takes $O({n^{2/3}\cdot \operatorname{polylog}(n,q)})$ parallel time, to the best of our knowledge, the first sublinear in $n$ runtime for arbitrary distributions. Our results have implications for sampling in autoregressive models. Our algorithm directly works with an equivalent oracle that answers conditional marginal queries $\mathbb{P}_{X\sim μ}[X_i=σ_i\;\vert\; X_S=σ_S]$, whose role is played by a trained neural network in autoregressive models. This suggests a roughly $n^{1/3}$-factor speedup is possible for sampling in any-order autoregressive models. We complement our positive result by showing a lower bound of $\widetildeΩ(n^{1/3})$ for the runtime of any parallel sampling algorithm making at most $\operatorname{poly}(n)$ queries to the counting oracle, even for $q=2$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Approximating Maximum Matching Requires Almost Quadratic Time

We study algorithms for estimating the size of maximum matching. This problem has been subject to extensive research. For $n$-vertex graphs, Bhattacharya, Kiss, and Saranurak [FOCS'23] (BKS) showed that an estimate that is within $\varepsilon n$ of the optimal solution can be achieved in $n^{2-Ω_\varepsilon(1)}$ time, where $n$ is the number of vertices. While this is subquadratic in $n$ for any fixed $\varepsilon > 0$, it gets closer and closer to the trivial $Θ(n^2)$ time algorithm that reads the entire input as $\varepsilon$ is made smaller and smaller. In this work, we close this gap and show that the algorithm of BKS is close to optimal. In particular, we prove that for any fixed $δ> 0$, there is another fixed $\varepsilon = \varepsilon(δ) > 0$ such that estimating the size of maximum matching within an additive error of $\varepsilon n$ requires $Ω(n^{2-δ})$ time in the adjacency list model.

cs.DS↗