Aulon Bajrami | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Data-Driven Configuration of Protective Separation Zones in Collaborative Robot Cells from Operator Occupancy

The protective separation zone of a collaborative robot cell is commonly dimensioned for a worst case that disregards where the operator is actually present during the task. This paper presents a camera-based, data-driven method that configures this zone from observed operator occupancy. Operator positions accumulated over several production shifts are aggregated into an occupancy heatmap, from which a protective field is derived that trades off the achievable robot velocity against the required safety distance, following the speed and separation monitoring principle of ISO/TS 15066. The resulting configuration is advisory, that is, reviewed within the risk assessment rather than applied autonomously to the robot controller. The method, which builds on a pose-based perception pipeline with activity recognition, was evaluated in two operational cells at two industrial partners, where the protective field could be reduced by approximately 17% and a productivity increase of 9% was measured. However, adoption proved to depend on more than the demonstrated gain alone.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

How Long Until Your Robot Ignores You? A Safety Benchmark for LLM Orchestrators in Human-Humanoid Collaboration

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed to orchestrate robot behavior through natural-language interfaces, yet no benchmark exists to evaluate their reliability as safety-aware decision makers in human-humanoid collaboration. Unlike deterministic safety systems that enforce binary allow/deny decisions, LLM-based orchestrators exhibit a compliance spectrum ranging from overcompliance (refusing safe actions) to full safety violations. This paper introduces the first safety benchmarking environment for LLM orchestrators in human-humanoid collaboration, built on a Model Context Protocol (MCP)-based architecture with safety invariants grounded in ISO 10218-2:2025 protective measures. The benchmark defines five testable safety invariants, a four-level compliance taxonomy (correct compliance, overcompliance, undercompliance, full violation), and a three-layer evaluation pipeline (text prompting, simulated sensor-actuator loops, and physical validation on a Unitree G1 EDU humanoid). We report Layer-1 results: three cloud backends (Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-4o-mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash) and a local open-weights baseline (qwen3:8b) across 40 100-turn sessions under full-context and sliding-window budget conditions, while the simulation and physical layers remain ongoing. We find that (1) model family determines the safety floor, as Claude and Gemini remain at or near zero violations while GPT-4o-mini commits up to 13 per session, (2) context management dissociates two failure axes, reducing mean behavioral issues by 42-57% for every cloud backend while nearly doubling GPT-4o-mini's violations (3.8 to 7.2 per session), and (3) proportional compliance, clamping movement speed to the rule-specified maximum rather than refusing, emerges consistently only in Gemini; the preliminary simulation layer reproduces the model ranking and the GPT-4o-mini failure-mode inversion.

cs.RO↗