arXiv subjects

Augusto Modanese

Publications and source records attributed to Augusto Modanese.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Is a LOCAL algorithm computable?

Common definitions of the "standard" LOCAL model tend to be sloppy and even self-contradictory on one point: do the nodes update their state using an arbitrary function or a computable function? So far, this distinction has been safe to neglect, since problems where it matters seem contrived and quite different from e.g. typical local graph problems studied in this context. We show that this question matters even for locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs), perhaps the most widely studied family of problems in the context of the LOCAL model. Furthermore, we show that assumptions about computability are directly connected to another aspect already recognized as highly relevant: whether we have any knowledge of $n$, the size of the graph. Concretely, we show that there is an LCL problem $\Pi$ with the following properties: 1. $\Pi$ can be solved in $O(\log n)$ rounds if the LOCAL model is uncomputable. 2. $\Pi$ can be solved in $O(\log n)$ rounds in the computable model if we know any upper bound on $n$. 3. $\Pi$ requires $\Omega(\sqrt{n})$ rounds in the computable model if we do not know anything about $n$. We also show that the connection between computability and knowledge of $n$ holds in general: for any LCL problem $\Pi$, if you have any bound on $n$, then $\Pi$ has the same round complexity in the computable and uncomputable models.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

Embedding arbitrary Boolean circuits into fungal automata with arbitrary update sequences

The sandpile automata of Bak, Tang, and Wiesenfeld (Phys. Rev. Lett., 1987) are a simple model for the diffusion of particles in space. A fundamental problem related to the complexity of the model is predicting its evolution in the parallel setting. Despite decades of effort, a classification of this problem for two-dimensional sandpile automata remains outstanding. Fungal automata were recently proposed by Goles et al. (Phys. Lett. A, 2020) as a spin-off of the model in which diffusion occurs either in horizontal $(H)$ or vertical $(V)$ directions according to a so-called update scheme. Goles et al. proved that the prediction problem for this model with the update scheme $H^4V^4$ is $\textbf{P}$-complete. This result was subsequently improved by Modanese and Worsch (Algorithmica, 2024), who showed the problem is $\textbf{P}$-complete also for the simpler updatenscheme $HV$. In this work, we fill in the gaps and prove that the prediction problem is $\textbf{P}$-complete for any update scheme that contains both $H$ and $V$ at least once.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Classification of Local Optimization Problems in Directed Cycles

We present a complete classification of the distributed computational complexity of local optimization problems in directed cycles for both the deterministic and the randomized LOCAL model. We show that for any local optimization problem $\Pi$ (that can be of the form min-sum, max-sum, min-max, or max-min, for any local cost or utility function over some finite alphabet), and for any constant approximation ratio $\alpha$, the task of finding an $\alpha$-approximation of $\Pi$ in directed cycles has one of the following complexities: 1. $O(1)$ rounds in deterministic LOCAL, $O(1)$ rounds in randomized LOCAL, 2. $\Theta(\log^* n)$ rounds in deterministic LOCAL, $O(1)$ rounds in randomized LOCAL, 3. $\Theta(\log^* n)$ rounds in deterministic LOCAL, $\Theta(\log^* n)$ rounds in randomized LOCAL, 4. $\Theta(n)$ rounds in deterministic LOCAL, $\Theta(n)$ rounds in randomized LOCAL. Moreover, for any given $\Pi$ and $\alpha$, we can determine the complexity class automatically, with an efficient (centralized, sequential) meta-algorithm, and we can also efficiently synthesize an asymptotically optimal distributed algorithm. Before this work, similar results were only known for local search problems (e.g., locally checkable labeling problems). The family of local optimization problems is a strict generalization of local search problems, and it contains numerous commonly studied distributed tasks, such as the problems of finding approximations of the maximum independent set, minimum vertex cover, minimum dominating set, and minimum vertex coloring.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

Orientation does not help with 3-coloring a grid in online-LOCAL

The online-LOCAL and SLOCAL models are extensions of the LOCAL model where nodes are processed in a sequential but potentially adversarial order. So far, the only problem we know of where the global memory of the online-LOCAL model has an advantage over SLOCAL is 3-coloring bipartite graphs. Recently, Chang et al. [PODC 2024] showed that even in grids, 3-coloring requires $\Omega(\log n)$ locality in deterministic online-LOCAL. This result was subsequently extended by Akbari et al. [STOC 2025] to also hold in randomized online-LOCAL. However, both proofs heavily rely on the assumption that the algorithm does not have access to the orientation of the underlying grid. In this paper, we show how to lift this requirement and obtain the same lower bound (against either model) even when the algorithm is explicitly given a globally consistent orientation of the grid.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

New Limits on Distributed Quantum Advantage: Dequantizing Linear Programs

In this work, we give two results that put new limits on distributed quantum advantage in the context of the LOCAL model of distributed computing. First, we show that there is no distributed quantum advantage for any linear program. Put otherwise, if there is a quantum-LOCAL algorithm $\mathcal{A}$ that finds an $\alpha$-approximation of some linear optimization problem $\Pi$ in $T$ communication rounds, we can construct a classical, deterministic LOCAL algorithm $\mathcal{A}'$ that finds an $\alpha$-approximation of $\Pi$ in $T$ rounds. As a corollary, all classical lower bounds for linear programs, including the KMW bound, hold verbatim in quantum-LOCAL. Second, using the above result, we show that there exists a locally checkable labeling problem (LCL) for which quantum-LOCAL is strictly weaker than the classical deterministic SLOCAL model. Our results extend from quantum-LOCAL also to finitely dependent and non-signaling distributions, and one of the corollaries of our work is that the non-signaling model and the SLOCAL model are incomparable in the context of LCL problems: By prior work, there exists an LCL problem for which SLOCAL is strictly weaker than the non-signaling model, and our work provides a separation in the opposite direction.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

Maximum Separation of Quantum Communication Complexity With and Without Shared Entanglement

We present relation problems whose input size is $n$ such that they can be solved with no communication for entanglement-assisted quantum communication models, but require $\Omega(n)$ qubit communication for $2$-way quantum communication models without prior shared entanglement. This is the maximum separation of quantum communication complexity with and without shared entanglement. To our knowledge, our result even shows the first lower bound on quantum communication complexity without shared entanglement when the upper bound of entanglement-assisted quantum communication models is zero. Our result refutes a quantum analog of Newman's theorem. The problem we consider is parallel repetition of any non-local game which has a perfect quantum strategy and no perfect classical strategy, and for which a parallel repetition theorem holds with exponential decay.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

Strong and Hiding Distributed Certification of Bipartiteness

In this paper, we study the problem of certifying whether a graph is bipartite (i.e. $2$-colorable) with a locally checkable proof (LCP) that is able to hide a $2$-coloring from the verifier. More precisely, we say an LCP for $2$-coloring is hiding if, in a yes-instance, it is possible to assign certificates to nodes without revealing an explicit $2$-coloring. Motivated by the search for promise-free separations of extensions of the LOCAL model in the context of locally checkable labeling (LCL) problems, we also require the LCPs to satisfy what we refer to as the strong soundness property. This is a strengthening of soundness that requires that, in a no-instance (i.e., a non-$2$-colorable graph) and for every certificate assignment, the subset of accepting nodes must induce a $2$-colorable subgraph. We show that strong and hiding LCPs for $2$-coloring exist in specific graph classes and requiring only $O(\log n)$-sized certificates. Furthermore, when the input is promised to be a cycle or contains a node of degree $1$, we show the existence of strong and hiding LCPs even in an anonymous network and with constant-size certificates. Despite these upper bounds, we prove that there are no strong and hiding LCPs for $2$-coloring in general, unless the algorithm has access to node identifiers and uses certificates of size~$\omega(1)$. Furthermore, in anonymous networks, the lower bound holds regardless of the certificate size. The proof relies on a Ramsey-type result as well as an argument about the realizability of subgraphs of the neighborhood graph consisting of the accepting views of an LCP. Along the way, we also give a characterization of the hiding property for the general $k$-coloring problem that appears to be a key component for future investigations in this context.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Distributed Quantum Advantage for Local Problems

We present the first local problem that shows a super-constant separation between the classical randomized LOCAL model of distributed computing and its quantum counterpart. By prior work, such a separation was known only for an artificial graph problem with an inherently global definition [Le Gall et al. 2019]. We present a problem that we call iterated GHZ, which is defined using only local constraints. Formally, it is a family of locally checkable labeling problems [Naor and Stockmeyer 1995]; in particular, solutions can be verified with a constant-round distributed algorithm. We show that in graphs of maximum degree $\Delta$, any classical (deterministic or randomized) LOCAL model algorithm will require $\Omega(\Delta)$ rounds to solve the iterated GHZ problem, while the problem can be solved in $1$ round in quantum-LOCAL. We use the round elimination technique to prove that the iterated GHZ problem requires $\Omega(\Delta)$ rounds for classical algorithms. This is the first work that shows that round elimination is indeed able to separate the two models, and this also demonstrates that round elimination cannot be used to prove lower bounds for quantum-LOCAL. To apply round elimination, we introduce a new technique that allows us to discover appropriate problem relaxations in a mechanical way; it turns out that this new technique extends beyond the scope of the iterated GHZ problem and can be used to e.g. reproduce prior results on maximal matchings [FOCS 2019, PODC 2020] in a systematic manner.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Local problems in trees across a wide range of distributed models

The randomized online-LOCAL model captures a number of models of computing; it is at least as strong as all of these models: - the classical LOCAL model of distributed graph algorithms, - the quantum version of the LOCAL model, - finitely dependent distributions [e.g. Holroyd 2016], - any model that does not violate physical causality [Gavoille, Kosowski, Markiewicz, DISC 2009], - the SLOCAL model [Ghaffari, Kuhn, Maus, STOC 2017], and - the dynamic-LOCAL and online-LOCAL models [Akbari et al., ICALP 2023]. In general, the online-LOCAL model can be much stronger than the LOCAL model. For example, there are locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) that can be solved with logarithmic locality in the online-LOCAL model but that require polynomial locality in the LOCAL model. However, in this work we show that in trees, many classes of LCL problems have the same locality in deterministic LOCAL and randomized online-LOCAL (and as a corollary across all the above-mentioned models). In particular, these classes of problems do not admit any distributed quantum advantage. We present a near-complete classification for the case of rooted regular trees. We also fully classify the super-logarithmic region in unrooted regular trees. Finally, we show that in general trees (rooted or unrooted, possibly irregular, possibly with input labels) problems that are global in deterministic LOCAL remain global also in the randomized online-LOCAL model.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Shared Randomness Helps with Local Distributed Problems

By prior work, we have many results related to distributed graph algorithms for problems that can be defined with local constraints; the formal framework used in prior work is locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs), introduced by Naor and Stockmeyer in the 1990s. It is known, for example, that if we have a deterministic algorithm that solves an LCL in $o(\log n)$ rounds, we can speed it up to $O(\log^*n)$ rounds, and if we have a randomized $O(\log^*n)$ rounds algorithm, we can derandomize it for free. It is also known that randomness helps with some LCL problems: there are LCL problems with randomized complexity $\Theta(\log\log n)$ and deterministic complexity $\Theta(\log n)$. However, so far there have not been any LCL problems in which the use of shared randomness has been necessary; in all prior algorithms it has been enough that the nodes have access to their own private sources of randomness. Could it be the case that shared randomness never helps with LCLs? Could we have a general technique that takes any distributed graph algorithm for any LCL that uses shared randomness, and turns it into an equally fast algorithm where private randomness is enough? In this work we show that the answer is no. We present an LCL problem $\Pi$ such that the round complexity of $\Pi$ is $\Omega(\sqrt n)$ in the usual randomized \local model with private randomness, but if the nodes have access to a source of shared randomness, then the complexity drops to $O(\log n)$. As corollaries, we also resolve several other open questions related to the landscape of distributed computing in the context of LCL problems. In particular, problem $\Pi$ demonstrates that distributed quantum algorithms for LCL problems strictly benefit from a shared quantum state. Problem $\Pi$ also gives a separation between finitely dependent distributions and non-signaling distributions.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Online Locality Meets Distributed Quantum Computing

We connect three distinct lines of research that have recently explored extensions of the classical LOCAL model of distributed computing: A. distributed quantum computing and non-signaling distributions [e.g. STOC 2024], B. finitely-dependent processes [e.g. Forum Math. Pi 2016], and C. locality in online graph algorithms and dynamic graph algorithms [e.g. ICALP 2023]. We prove new results on the capabilities and limitations of all of these models of computing, for locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs). We show that all these settings can be sandwiched between the classical LOCAL model and what we call the randomized online-LOCAL model. Our work implies limitations on the quantum advantage in the distributed setting, and we also exhibit a new barrier for proving tighter bounds. Our main technical results are these: 1. All LCL problems solvable with locality $O(\log^\star n)$ in the classical deterministic LOCAL model admit a finitely-dependent distribution with locality $O(1)$. This answers an open question by Holroyd [2024], and also presents a new barrier for proving bounds on distributed quantum advantage using causality-based arguments. 2. In rooted trees, if we can solve an LCL problem with locality $o(\log \log \log n)$ in the randomized online-LOCAL model (or any of the weaker models, such as quantum-LOCAL), we can solve it with locality $O(\log^\star n)$ in the classical deterministic LOCAL model. One of many implications is that in rooted trees, $O(\log^\star n)$ locality in quantum-LOCAL is not stronger than $O(\log^\star n)$ locality in classical LOCAL.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2023

Testing Spreading Behavior in Networks with Arbitrary Topologies

Inspired by the works of Goldreich and Ron (J. ACM, 2017) and Nakar and Ron (ICALP, 2021), we initiate the study of property testing in dynamic environments with arbitrary topologies. Our focus is on the simplest non-trivial rule that can be tested, which corresponds to the 1-BP rule of bootstrap percolation and models a simple spreading behavior: Every "infected" node stays infected forever, and each "healthy" node becomes infected if and only if it has at least one infected neighbor. We show various results for both the case where we test a single time step of evolution and where the evolution spans several time steps. In the first, we show that the worst-case query complexity is $O(\Delta/\varepsilon)$ or $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n}/\varepsilon)$ (whichever is smaller), where $\Delta$ and $n$ are the maximum degree of a node and number of vertices, respectively, in the underlying graph, and we also show lower bounds for both one- and two-sided error testers that match our upper bounds up to $\Delta = o(\sqrt{n})$ and $\Delta = O(n^{1/3})$, respectively. In the second setting of testing the environment over $T$ time steps, we show upper bounds of $O(\Delta^{T-1}/\varepsilon T)$ and $\tilde{O}(|E|/\varepsilon T)$, where $E$ is the set of edges of the underlying graph. All of our algorithms are one-sided error, and all of them are also time-conforming and non-adaptive, with the single exception of the more complex $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n}/\varepsilon)$-query tester for the case $T = 2$.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2023

No distributed quantum advantage for approximate graph coloring

We give an almost complete characterization of the hardness of $c$-coloring $\chi$-chromatic graphs with distributed algorithms, for a wide range of models of distributed computing. In particular, we show that these problems do not admit any distributed quantum advantage. To do that: 1) We give a new distributed algorithm that finds a $c$-coloring in $\chi$-chromatic graphs in $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^{\frac{1}{\alpha}})$ rounds, with $\alpha = \bigl\lfloor\frac{c-1}{\chi - 1}\bigr\rfloor$. 2) We prove that any distributed algorithm for this problem requires $\Omega(n^{\frac{1}{\alpha}})$ rounds. Our upper bound holds in the classical, deterministic LOCAL model, while the near-matching lower bound holds in the non-signaling model. This model, introduced by Arfaoui and Fraigniaud in 2014, captures all models of distributed graph algorithms that obey physical causality; this includes not only classical deterministic LOCAL and randomized LOCAL but also quantum-LOCAL, even with a pre-shared quantum state. We also show that similar arguments can be used to prove that, e.g., 3-coloring 2-dimensional grids or $c$-coloring trees remain hard problems even for the non-signaling model, and in particular do not admit any quantum advantage. Our lower-bound arguments are purely graph-theoretic at heart; no background on quantum information theory is needed to establish the proofs.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2023

Pseudorandom Generators for Sliding-Window Algorithms

A sliding-window algorithm of window size $t$ is an algorithm whose current operation depends solely on the last $t$ symbols read. We construct pseudorandom generators (PRGs) for low-space randomized sliding-window algorithms that have access to a binary randomness source. More specifically, we lift these algorithms to the non-uniform setting of branching programs and study them as a subclass thereof that we call sliding-window branching programs (SWBPs), accordingly. For general SWBPs, given a base PRG $G_\mathrm{base}$ with seed length $d_\mathrm{base}$ that $\varepsilon_\mathrm{base}$-fools width-$w$, length-$t$ (general) branching programs, we give two PRG constructions for fooling any same-width SWBP of length $n$ and window size $t$ (where we assume $w \ge n$). The first uses an additional $d_\mathrm{base} + O(\log(n/t) \log(1/\varepsilon_\mathrm{base}))$ random bits, whereas the second has a seed length of $O((d_\mathrm{base} + \log\log(n/t) + \log(1/\varepsilon_\mathrm{base})) \log(d_\mathrm{base} + \log(1/\varepsilon_\mathrm{base})))$. Both PRGs incur only a $(n/2t)^{O(1)}$ multiplicative loss in the error parameter. As an application, we show how to decide the language of a sublinear-time probabilistic cellular automaton using small space. More specifically, these results target the model of PACAs, which are probabilistic cellular automata that accept if and only if all cells are simultaneously accepting. For (sublinear) $T(n) = \Omega(\log n)^{1.01}$, we prove that every language accepted by a $T$-time one-sided error PACA (the PACA equivalent of $\mathsf{RP}$) can be decided using only $O(T)$ space. Meanwhile, forgoing the previous requirement on $T$, we show the same holds for $T$-time two-sided error PACA (the PACA equivalent of $\mathsf{BPP}$) if we use $\tilde{O}(T) + O(\log n)$ space instead (where the $\tilde{O}$ notation hides only $\mathsf{polylog}(T)$ factors).

cs.CC↗

arXiv2022

Embedding arbitrary Boolean circuits into fungal automata

Fungal automata are a variation of the two-dimensional sandpile automaton of Bak, Tang, and Wiesenfeld (Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987). In each step toppling cells emit grains only to some of their neighbors chosen according to a specific update sequence. We show how to embed any Boolean circuit into the initial configuration of a fungal automaton with update sequence $HV$. In particular we give a constructor that, given the description $B$ of a circuit, computes the states of all cells in the finite support of the embedding configuration in $O(\log |B|)$ space. As a consequence the prediction problem for fungal automata with update sequence $HV$ is $\mathsf{P}$-complete. This solves an open problem of Goles et al. (Phys. Lett. A, 2020).

cs.CC↗

arXiv2022

Sublinear-Time Probabilistic Cellular Automata

We propose and investigate a probabilistic model of sublinear-time one-dimensional cellular automata. In particular, we modify the model of ACA (which are cellular automata that accept if and only if all cells simultaneously accept) so that every cell changes its state not only dependent on the states it sees in its neighborhood but also on an unbiased coin toss of its own. The resulting model is dubbed probabilistic ACA (PACA). We consider one- and two-sided error versions of the model (in the same spirit as the classes $\mathsf{RP}$ and $\mathsf{BPP}$) and establish a separation between the classes of languages they can recognize all the way up to $o(\sqrt{n})$ time. As a consequence, we have a $\Omega(\sqrt{n})$ lower bound for derandomizing constant-time two-sided error PACAs (using deterministic ACAs). We also prove that derandomization of $T(n)$-time PACAs (to polynomial-time deterministic cellular automata) for various regimes of $T(n) = \omega(\log n)$ implies non-trivial derandomization results for the class $\mathsf{RP}$ (e.g., $\mathsf{P} = \mathsf{RP}$). The main contribution is an almost full characterization of the constant-time PACA classes: For one-sided error, the class equals that of the deterministic model; that is, constant-time one-sided error PACAs can be fully derandomized with only a constant multiplicative overhead in time complexity. As for two-sided error, we identify a natural class we call the linearly testable languages ($\mathsf{LLT}$) and prove that the languages decidable by constant-time two-sided error PACAs are "sandwiched" in-between the closure of $\mathsf{LLT}$ under union and intersection and the class of locally threshold testable languages ($\mathsf{LTT}$).

cs.FL↗

arXiv2020

Lower Bounds and Hardness Magnification for Sublinear-Time Shrinking Cellular Automata

The minimum circuit size problem (MCSP) is a string compression problem with a parameter $s$ in which, given the truth table of a Boolean function over inputs of length $n$, one must answer whether it can be computed by a Boolean circuit of size at most $s(n) \ge n$. Recently, McKay, Murray, and Williams (STOC, 2019) proved a hardness magnification result for MCSP involving (one-pass) streaming algorithms: For any reasonable $s$, if there is no $\mathsf{poly}(s(n))$-space streaming algorithm with $\mathsf{poly}(s(n))$ update time for $\mathsf{MCSP}[s]$, then $\mathsf{P} \neq \mathsf{NP}$. We prove an analogous result for the (provably) strictly less capable model of shrinking cellular automata (SCAs), which are cellular automata whose cells can spontaneously delete themselves. We show every language accepted by an SCA can also be accepted by a streaming algorithm of similar complexity, and we identify two different aspects in which SCAs are more restricted than streaming algorithms. We also show there is a language which cannot be accepted by any SCA in $o(n / \log n)$ time, even though it admits an $O(\log n)$-space streaming algorithm with $O(\log n)$ update time.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2019

Sublinear-Time Language Recognition and Decision by One-Dimensional Cellular Automata

After an apparent hiatus of roughly 30 years, we revisit a seemingly neglected subject in the theory of (one-dimensional) cellular automata: sublinear-time computation. The model considered is that of ACAs, which are language acceptors whose acceptance condition depends on the states of all cells in the automaton. We prove a time hierarchy theorem for sublinear-time ACA classes, analyze their intersection with the regular languages, and, finally, establish strict inclusions in the parallel computation classes $\mathsf{SC}$ and (uniform) $\mathsf{AC}$. As an addendum, we introduce and investigate the concept of a decider ACA (DACA) as a candidate for a decider counterpart to (acceptor) ACAs. We show the class of languages decidable in constant time by DACAs equals the locally testable languages, and we also determine $\Omega(\sqrt{n})$ as the (tight) time complexity threshold for DACAs up to which no advantage compared to constant time is possible.

cs.CC↗