arXiv subjects

Athanasios Avgetidis

Publications and source records attributed to Athanasios Avgetidis.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Unpacking .zip: A First Look at Domain and File Name Confusion

The namespace for filenames and DNS names has overlapped since the introduction of DNS in 1985: \texttt{.com} was the original binary format used for DOS and CP/M systems. Recently the introduction of gTLDs such as \texttt{.zip} and \texttt{.mov}, coupled with the growing prevalence of web resources, has ignited new concerns about potential issues related to DNS and filename confusion. Thus far, the discourse on DNS/filename confusion has been piecemeal and hypothetical, making it unclear what, if any, security concerns credibly exist. To address this gap, we provide the first enumeration of how DNS/filename confusion can be abused. We then perform the first empirical case studies of DNS/filename confusion in the wild, which highlights suspected confusion across a wide range of software. Finally, based on our preliminary findings, we provide suggestions and guidance for future research on this topic.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

Revealing the True Indicators: Understanding and Improving IoC Extraction From Threat Reports

Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) are critical for threat detection and response, marking malicious activity across networks and systems. Yet, the effectiveness of automated IoC extraction systems is fundamentally limited by one key issue: the lack of high-quality ground truth. Current extraction tools rely either on manually extracted ground truth, which is labor-intensive and costly, or on automated ground truth creation methods that include non-malicious artifacts, leading to inflated false positive (FP) rates and unreliable threat intelligence. In this work, we analyze the shortcomings of existing ground truth creation strategies and address them by introducing the first hybrid human-in-the-loop pipeline for IoC extraction, which combines a large language model-based classifier (LANCE) with expert analyst validation. Our system improves precision through explainable, context-aware labeling and reduces analysts' work factor by 43% compared to manual annotation, as demonstrated in our evaluation with six analysts. Using this approach, we produce PRISM, a high-quality, publicly available benchmark of 1,791 labeled IoCs from 50 real-world threat reports. PRISM supports both fair evaluation and training of IoC extraction methods and enables reproducible research grounded in expert-validated indicators.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2024

SoK: An Essential Guide For Using Malware Sandboxes In Security Applications: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Lessons Learned

Malware sandboxes provide many benefits for security applications, but they are complex. These complexities can overwhelm new users in different research areas and make it difficult to select, configure, and use sandboxes. Even worse, incorrectly using sandboxes can have a negative impact on security applications. In this paper, we address this knowledge gap by systematizing 84 representative papers for using x86/64 malware sandboxes in the academic literature. We propose a novel framework to simplify sandbox components and organize the literature to derive practical guidelines for using sandboxes. We evaluate the proposed guidelines systematically using three common security applications and demonstrate that the choice of different sandboxes can significantly impact the results. Specifically, our results show that the proposed guidelines improve the sandbox observable activities by at least 1.6x and up to 11.3x. Furthermore, we observe a roughly 25% improvement in accuracy, precision, and recall when using the guidelines to help with a malware family classification task. We conclude by affirming that there is no "silver bullet" sandbox deployment that generalizes, and we recommend that users apply our framework to define a scope for their analysis, a threat model, and derive context about how the sandbox artifacts will influence their intended use case. Finally, it is important that users document their experiment, limitations, and potential solutions for reproducibility

cs.CR↗