Ashim Nepal | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Keyframes First, Motion Second: Revisiting Compressed-Domain Video Captioning under Limited Supervision

Compressed-domain video captioners such as CoCap read the H.264 bitstream directly: a pretrained encoder reads the keyframes (I-frames), while motion and residual encoders, trained from scratch, turn the codec's motion vectors and residuals into action tokens. This motion branch costs decoding time and supervision, both scarce on edge devices. We ask when it pays off under limited supervision. In a controlled study on 2,500 VATEX training clips, we fix a frozen SigLIP 2 keyframe encoder, a GPT-2 caption decoder and the training schedule, vary only the visual tokens the decoder receives (34 configurations), and report held-out test CIDEr with paired bootstrap intervals and three seeds. Motion encoders trained from scratch bring no measurable benefit: CoCap-style action tokens change CIDEr by -0.55 (95% CI [-2.3, +1.2]), and six other uses of motion do not help. Warm-started from a model trained on 48x the caption samples, they add +1.3 CIDEr on average, though not significantly across seeds, and only while the keyframe tokens stay frozen. Reading the keyframes better matters more: fine-tuning SigLIP 2's own attention-pooling head adds 5.4 CIDEr, and one to eight such tokens beat the 16 CoCap-style tokens on every seed while decoding only I-frames (7.3 ms instead of 44-114 ms per clip). The same holds on MSVD's full split in CoCap's own video encoding, where the readout leads by 14.2 CIDEr and action tokens bring no reliable gain, also with clean single-reference motion vectors. Under limited supervision, keyframes come first and motion second.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Modernising the Compressed-Domain Video Captioner: A Controlled Study of SigLIP2 and GPT-2 Substitutions

Compressed-domain video captioning avoids full video decoding by operating directly on I-frames, motion vectors and residuals, trading a small amount of accuracy for a large gain in inference speed. CoCap established this pipeline using a CLIP vision encoder and a shallow BERT-style multimodal decoder. Both components predate substantially stronger alternatives. We ask a narrow, controlled question: how much of CoCap's accuracy is limited by these two components, and which of the two is the binding constraint? We replace the CLIP I-frame encoder with SigLIP2 and the BERT-style decoder with GPT-2, and evaluate three configurations (the original pairing, the encoder substitution alone, and both substitutions together) under identical data, sampling budget and optimisation schedule. All comparisons are made against our own reproduction of CoCap rather than its published numbers, because we train on a 4,999-clip subset of VATEX at a reduced sampling budget; absolute values are therefore not comparable with the original work. Our reproduction tracks the published result closely: CIDEr and METEOR run slightly above it (54.9 against 52.7; 23.4 against 23.2), BLEU-4 and ROUGE-L slightly below (29.7 against 31.4; 48.9 against 49.4). We attribute the differences to our evaluation subset rather than to any improvement in either direction. We find the two substitutions pull in opposite directions: SigLIP2 alone improves every metric (+4.5 CIDEr), while adding GPT-2 on top erodes that gain, because a pretrained decoder overfits 4,999 clips within two epochs. We additionally report inference latency for each configuration, since speed is the property that motivates compressed-domain captioning in the first place, and an accuracy gain purchased at a latency cost should be reported as such.

cs.CV↗