From Round-Trip State Echo to Error Recovery: Snapshot-Resolved Quantum-Hardware Diagnostics
We examine which conclusions from quantum-hardware benchmarks persist when the same programs are run again. On eight fixed routes of IQM Emerald, round-trip state echo (RTSE), a diagnostic of state return after a round trip, gave mean scores near $0.84$ that differed by only $0.00125$ between two executions. Individual route estimates nevertheless changed by up to $0.06$ in both directions. The mean difference between RTSE and measurement-free teleportation along the same routes shrank from $0.046$ to $0.014$ and was no longer statistically resolved on repetition; none of the four prespecified communication targets met its replication rule. Recovery with an existing four-qubit single-deletion code also changed on repetition: after discarding one encoded qubit in the circuit model, the IQM mean fell from $0.738$ to $0.624$ and failed the replication test against the two-thirds operational reference. In a separate IonQ experiment, recovery means of $0.91$ and $0.92$ passed tests against that reference and against a deliberately incorrect decoder in both executions. These results concern the tested workloads and executions. They show why a nearly unchanged aggregate benchmark score needs to be interpreted alongside individual routes, direct task comparisons, and repeated executions.