arXiv subjects

Arunan J

Publications and source records attributed to Arunan J.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Phase Transition Frequency as a Training Time Predictor of Test Accuracy in ResNets

The number of discrete class-separability jumps observed during ResNet finetuning is examined empirically as a predictor of final test accuracy. Across 75 experiments spanning four benchmarks (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, TinyImageNet, and CIFAR-10-C) and three architectures (ResNet-18, ResNet-50, and ResNet-101), with five to ten seeds per configuration, a strong within-dataset negative correlation is obtained on standard i.i.d. classification benchmarks: \(r = -0.84\) on CIFAR-10 (\(p < 10^{-8}\), \(n = 30\)) and \(r = -0.87\) on CIFAR-100 (\(p < 10^{-5}\), \(n = 15\)). Under distributional stress, the relationship attenuates: TinyImageNet yields \(r = -0.45\), and the CIFAR-10-C corruption benchmark yields \(r = -0.19\). Two additional analyses discipline the empirical claim. A partial correlation controlling for architecture depth, treated as a linear covariate, shows that on CIFAR-100 the transition count retains statistically significant predictive power (\(r_{\mathrm{partial}} = -0.69\), \(p = 0.007\)); the corresponding result under the stricter categorical conditioning is not established at \(n = 15\). A comparison against six alternative training-curve signals shows that transition count achieved the strongest correlation among the evaluated signals on CIFAR-100 and one of the strongest on CIFAR-10, but is dominated by other signals on the two stressed benchmarks. The comparison is restricted to training-curve-level signals; comparisons against effective rank, Hessian sharpness, Fisher information, margin, and neural-collapse measures, which are the strongest competitors in the current literature, are not part of the present study and remain open. The observation is presented as an in-distribution training-quality probe among a family of candidate probes, and an inexpensive detection procedure suitable for logging alongside a standard training loop is provided.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Tight Sample Complexity for Low-Rank Adaptation: Matching Bounds and Rank Selection

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become the standard mechanism for fine-tuning large pretrained models, yet its statistical properties remain only partially understood. Existing generalization results provide upper bounds of the form O~(sqrt(rd/n)) or O~(rd/n), but a matching lower bound is missing, and the question of how to choose the LoRA rank r has no formal answer. Both gaps are closed here. A local Rademacher argument establishes an upper bound of O~(rd/n) on the excess risk of the empirical risk minimizer over rank-r LoRA, whenever the target adaptation has rank at most r. A matching minimax lower bound of Omega(rd/n) is then proved via a Fano-type packing of the rank-r subspace of R^{d x d}; the bound applies to any estimator whose output lies in the rank-r LoRA class. Combining the two yields a rank-selection dichotomy. For the constrained empirical risk minimizer, the optimal rank equals the intrinsic rank r*, and over-ranking strictly hurts. For adaptive estimators of the nuclear-norm-then-truncate type, over-ranking is harmless and the rate saturates at Theta~(r* d / n) regardless of r. Taken together, the three results characterize the statistical complexity of LoRA fine-tuning within the well-specified locally quadratic regime, and identify the empirically observed over-parameterization penalty as a property of unregularized empirical risk minimization rather than of the LoRA class itself. Predictions of the theory are verified on a synthetic trace-regression benchmark and on real LoRA fine-tuning across three (model, task) configurations covering DistilBERT and RoBERTa on SST-2 and MRPC. All configurations exhibit the predicted U-shape in validation loss, with two showing statistically significant loss inflation at large ranks (paired permutation p = 0.016).

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Detecting Neural Network Failures through Spectral Analysis of Internal Activations

Neural network misclassifications exhibit characteristic spectral instability in internal activations that is invisible at the output layer. This phenomenon is identified and formalized as Spectral Drift -- the frequency-domain distance between consecutive layer activations -- with empirical validation showing that failures exhibit significantly higher drift than correct predictions (1.9% increase, p<0.001). This spectral signature emerges during internal processing but becomes masked in final outputs, explaining why confidence-based detection methods struggle. This work introduces Self-Detecting Neural Networks (SDNN), a framework that monitors spectral dynamics across network depth using Short-Time Fourier Transform, wavelet decomposition, and statistical moments to capture multi-scale spectral features. A lightweight detector network (5% parameter overhead) learns to identify failure-indicative patterns via curriculum learning on progressively challenging distributions: natural misclassifications, distribution shifts, and adversarial perturbations. Experiments on CIFAR-10 demonstrate that SDNN achieves 79.0 +/- 25.3% AUROC across three seeds, substantially outperforming confidence-based baselines including MaxSoftmax (50.5%) and Energy Score (52.9%) by approximately 25-30 percentage points. Ablation studies reveal that wavelet decomposition and statistical features make consistent contributions, while STFT's role remains unclear. This work establishes spectral analysis of internal activations as a promising direction for neural network reliability, revealing diagnostic information inaccessible to output-based approaches.

cs.LG↗