arXiv subjects

Arslan Brömme

Publications and source records attributed to Arslan Brömme.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

An Evidence Model for Agentic Processes: Evidence Claims, Trust Assumptions, and Policy Assessment

Agentic AI systems increasingly exchange messages, invoke tools, request approvals, hold structured decision sessions, and modify shared artifacts. Logs and anchors can make selected records tamper-evident, but they can also mislead if their evidentiary meaning is implicit: a hash does not establish semantic truth, a signature does not establish authorization, and an external anchor does not establish capture completeness. This paper proposes an evidence claim model for agentic processes. It distinguishes artifact integrity, temporal existence, provenance, approval evidence, declared ordering, capture claim, relevance claim, deliberation traceability, monitoring claim, anchoring authorization claim, policy assessment claim, risk treatment claim, mitigation implementation claim, and management response claim. Semantic validity is treated as a recurring limitation. The model maps these claims to mechanisms, assumptions, limitations, and threats, and situates them in an agent organization with functional CEO agent, executive, operational, evidence, and audit roles, plus a plan-do-check-act-inspired management response loop. The contribution is conceptual: it does not validate a particular implementation, prevent all failures, or automate legal compliance. It provides a vocabulary for stating which claims an agentic black box can support, which claims it cannot establish, and which controls are required around it.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

A Black Box for Agentic Processes: Blockchain-Anchored Evidence for AI Agent Communication, Human Oversight, and GRC Audits

Autonomous AI agents increasingly communicate with other agents, invoke tools, exchange intermediate results, and request human approvals. These workflows create a new auditability problem: organizations must reconstruct what happened, when it happened, which agent or human was involved, which control or policy applied, and whether records were modified afterwards. Motivated by the 2026 OpenAI/Hugging Face incident, this position and architecture paper proposes a product- and vendor-neutral black-box architecture for agentic processes. The architecture creates blockchain-anchored cryptographic commitments for selected agent communications, human-in-the-loop approvals, tool calls, and process artifacts without placing sensitive content on-chain. We define an evidence model that distinguishes temporal anchoring and artifact integrity from event ordering, capture authenticity, authorized anchoring, and causal traceability. The latter properties require additional architectural controls. We then discuss practical use for Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), including compliance testing, risk-based evidence selection, monitoring evidence streams, incident reconstruction, and regulatory reporting readiness under the EU AI Act, NIS2, and the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). This position and architecture paper does not present an empirical performance or security evaluation. The approach does not prevent agent misbehavior or prove semantic truth. Rather, it strengthens the evidentiary basis for later verification of critical process traces.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Canonicalization Failures as a Recurring Vulnerability Class: Representation Divergence in Cryptographic Systems and Its Avoidance

Cryptographic systems operate on bytes but mean semantic objects. The translation between the two is rarely unique. Where this uniqueness is not enforced, an attack surface opens up as soon as a hash, a signature, replay protection, or consensus identity depends on the representation. The same class of failure has been discovered independently and named locally across many ecosystems, as transaction malleability, non-deterministic value encoding, message malleability, or hash chain malleability, without its common root being tracked as a cross-ecosystem grid. This work organizes the scattered findings systematically: it shows that they are instances of one violated uniqueness condition, along two basic directions: multiple valid codes for one object (object-side multiple representation) or one code for multiple objects (code-side semantic collapse). The contribution is explicitly not the discovery of the phenomenon, but is threefold: the systematization by representation mechanism rather than by affected system, the bridge between classical canonicalization security and a representation- and computability-theoretic foundation, and the translation into an applicable review procedure (a canonicalization obligation with a sequence of review steps, a field-type classification, and an operational boundary model) with which the risk can be recognized preventively. We substantiate the class with worked-out cases, delimit it against incidents that are not representation problems, and deliberately keep the claims to what is demonstrable: enforced uniqueness can reduce the exploitability of a failure class, but it neither replaces further protective measures or makes any statement about cryptographic security in the narrower sense

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Algorithmically Presented Numbers and Canonical Representations in Cryptographic Protocols

This paper develops a representation-theoretic perspective on cryptographic protocols. The focus is not solely on the computability of the abstract value as an extensional property, but on the algorithmic structure of its presentation in a representation system: for operational use in protocols, algorithmic accessibility of the value does not suffice; its fixed presentation is also decisive. We distinguish three representation-theoretic notions -- algorithmically approximable (A_app, the computable real numbers), finitely exactly describable in a system (A_fin(S)), and canonical normalizability of a system -- and show that there is no computable extensional canonicalizer that uniformly transforms arbitrary approximation programs of computable real numbers into unique finite value encodings. As the operational rational core presentation we use the rational system with its canonical encoding specification Sigma_Q (fixed rules for valid fraction descriptions, canonical codes, and normalization); the associated value set is A_ex = Q. The notion of a canonically serializable object class transfers this core idea to practical protocol objects (files as byte sequences, hash values, transaction IDs, and normatively serialized payloads). We illustrate the consequences for interoperability, well-definedness, and verification with fully worked toy examples from symmetric and asymmetric encryption and hashing, and with a real-world example, the snaproot hash-anchoring protocol for blockchain-based file integrity verification. The paper thereby shows that the mathematical determinacy of a value and its operational uniqueness as a protocol object are two different requirements. Once a normative representation specification has been fixed, byte-level correctness and well-definedness arguments can be carried out without further implementation-dependent serialization or rounding decisions.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

snaproot: Decentralized File Integrity Verification Using Blockchain-Anchored Cryptographic Hashing

The rapid growth of digital content has made reliable integrity verification increasingly important. Existing solutions rely either on centralized authorities, which introduce trust dependencies and single points of failure, or on decentralized storage systems that incur prohibitive resource overhead. In this paper, we present snaproot, a lightweight system that implements the hash-anchoring paradigm of Haber and Stornetta on the Solana blockchain to provide efficient, decentralized file integrity verification. snaproot generates a SHA-256 hash of a file and stores it immutably on-chain as a permanent reference record. Verification is performed by recomputing the hash and comparing it to the stored value, yielding a deterministic binary outcome. We describe a four-tier trust architecture comprising three realized tiers and one prospective tier for long-term persistence beyond the lifetime of any single blockchain. We present a formal threat model, a security analysis grounded in the second-preimage resistance of SHA-256, and an empirical evaluation on Solana Devnet across file sizes from 1 KB to 500 MB. A central conceptual contribution is the explicit separation between existence proof, the key-independent claim that a file existed at a given time, and authorship proof, the key-dependent binding between a record and a specific wallet identity. This separation allows existence guarantees to survive key loss while preserving stronger authorship claims where keys are retained. We position snaproot against OpenTimestamps, OriginStamp, and Chainpoint and discuss limitations with respect to pre-registration manipulation and AI-generated content.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Bridging the Cybersecurity Gap Between Web2 and Web3 -- An Incident-Based Analysis of Organizational and Application-Level Security Failures

The rapid adoption of Web3 infrastructures has led to a growing number of security incidents affecting cryptocurrency exchanges, custody services and blockchain-based platforms. While existing research predominantly focuses on vulnerabilities in smart contracts and blockchain protocols, a substantial portion of real-world losses originates from off-chain systems, organizational processes and human-centered operational workflows. This paper presents a qualitative, incident-based analysis of publicly documented, high-impact security breaches in the Web3 ecosystem, including the Bybit exchange incident (2025), the Ronin Network bridge compromise (2022), and the DMM Bitcoin exchange breach (2024). The selected cases are systematically analysed and mapped to established Web2 security reference frameworks, including OWASP-based vulnerability categories and organizational security control domains. The results indicate that dominant failure patterns in Web3 environments are insufficiently addressed by generic security control catalogues, particularly with respect to cryptographic key management, transaction approval governance, signer and validator infrastructure, third-party tooling dependencies, and human-in-the-loop processes. Based on these findings, this paper argues for the adoption of established information security management systems (ISMS) in Web3 organizations and derives a structured set of blockchain-specific cybersecurity control categories to operationalize existing ISMS frameworks for blockchain-based systems. The proposed categories aim to bridge the gap between generic security governance frameworks and domain-specific risks inherent to Web3 infrastructures.

cs.CR↗