arXiv subjects

Aris Filos-Ratsikas

Publications and source records attributed to Aris Filos-Ratsikas.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Computational Aspects of Distortion

The distortion framework in social choice theory allows quantifying the efficiency of (randomized) selection of an alternative based on the preferences of a set of agents. We make two fundamental contributions to this framework. First, we develop a linear-programming-based algorithm for computing the optimal randomized decision on a given instance, which is simpler and faster than the state-of-the-art solutions. For practitioners who may prefer to deploy a classical decision-making rule over the aforementioned optimal rule, we develop an algorithm based on non-convex quadratic programming for computing the exact distortion of any (and the best) randomized positional scoring rule. For a small number of alternatives, we find that the exact distortion bounds are significantly better than the asymptotic upper bounds established in prior literature and lead to different recommendations on which rules to use. These results rely on a novel characterization of the instances yielding the worst distortion, which may be of independent interest.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

AI-driven Prices for Externalities and Sustainability in Production Markets

Traditional competitive markets do not account for negative externalities; indirect costs that some participants impose on others, such as the cost of over-appropriating a common-pool resource (which diminishes future stock, and thus harvest, for everyone). Quantifying appropriate interventions to market prices has proven to be quite challenging. We propose a practical approach to computing market prices and allocations via a deep reinforcement learning policymaker agent, operating in an environment of other learning agents. Our policymaker allows us to tune the prices with regard to diverse objectives such as sustainability and resource wastefulness, fairness, buyers' and sellers' welfare, etc. As a highlight of our findings, our policymaker is significantly more successful in maintaining resource sustainability, compared to the market equilibrium outcome, in scarce resource environments.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2026

The Delegation Dilemma: Economies of Scale, Accountability, and Polycentric Governance

Many collective-action systems are neither fully decentralized nor fully centralized: agents voluntarily organize into institutions that share organizational costs and delegate decisions to representatives. Delegation can reduce individual costs, but it also transfers control to representatives whose private objectives need not align with those of their constituents. We study this tension in a repeated game with endogenous delegation to self-interested centers. A simple reduced-form model yields a scale--accountability tradeoff: larger constituencies offer greater cost-sharing benefits to members, yet the marginal value to a center of retaining any one constituent decreases as group size grows. Consequently, the prospect of individual exit can sustain non-exploitative delegation only up to an endogenous accountable constituency size. Additionally, we identify parameter regions in which fully delegated, accountable governance, when feasible, must be polycentric. We investigate these predictions through simulations with large language model (LLM) agents. Across five matched pairs of 30-agent simulations, polycentric structures repeatedly emerge but remain fluid, exhibiting cycles of concentration, exploitation, exit, and re-formation. We further find that models of different capacity exhibit similar willingness to assume leadership but differ substantially in their exercise of authority, with Sol initiating exploitation more frequently than Luna in matched decision states.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2026

Nash Equilibria in Auctions with Pacing Strategies: Complexity and Inefficiency

We introduce and study Auctions with Pacing Strategies (APS) games, a full-information model in which utility-maximizing bidders compete across many simultaneous first-price auctions, each choosing a single pacing multiplier that uniformly scales their values into bids. We settle three central questions. First, we show that there are instances that admit no approximate pure Nash equilibria. Then, we prove that the problem of deciding whether an APS game admits an (approximate) equilibrium is NP-complete in general, but can be solved in polynomial time if either the number of bidders or the number of items is fixed. Finally, when an equilibrium does exist, we characterize its inefficiency exactly, showing that both the Price of Anarchy and the Price of Stability equal $\frac{e}{e-1}$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Binary $k$-Center under a Hard Threshold with Applications to Delegated Voting

We study the problem of covering binary strings of the same length, possibly with missing entries, by a fixed number of center strings, such that each input string is within a given relative distance of the closest center. The problem has applications in binary $k$-center clustering and bioinformatics, but our main motivation comes from computational social choice. In the setting of multi-issue approval voting, we consider an algorithmic question that precedes any election: how should representatives be designed so that as many voters as possible are willing to delegate? We study the problem in two dimensions, namely the number of centers and the agreement threshold, parameters that are application-specific, and provide a complete picture of its computational complexity when entries may be missing. For the special case without missing entries, we extend our hardness results to any number of centers and large values of threshold, leaving a narrow range of thresholds unresolved.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Pushing the Frontier on Approximate EFX Allocations

We study the problem of allocating a set of indivisible goods to a set of agents with additive valuation functions, aiming to achieve approximate envy-freeness up to any good ($α$-EFX). The state-of-the-art results on the problem include that (exact) EFX allocations exist when (a) there are at most three agents, or (b) the agents' valuation functions can take at most two values, or (c) the agents' valuation functions can be represented via a graph. For $α$-EFX, it is known that a $0.618$-EFX allocation exists for any number of agents with additive valuation functions. In this paper, we show that $2/3$-EFX allocations exist when (a) there are at most seven agents, (b) the agents' valuation functions can take at most three values, or (c) the agents' valuation functions can be represented via a multigraph. Our results can be interpreted in two ways. First, by relaxing the notion of EFX to $2/3$-EFX, we obtain existence results for strict generalizations of the settings for which exact EFX allocations are known to exist. Secondly, by imposing restrictions on the setting, we manage to beat the barrier of $0.618$ and achieve an approximation guarantee of $2/3$. Therefore, our results push the frontier of existence and computation of approximate EFX allocations, and provide insights into the challenges of settling the existence of exact EFX allocations.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Efficient Equilibrium Computation in Symmetric First-Price Auctions

We study the complexity of computing Bayes-Nash equilibria in single-item first-price auctions. We present the first efficient algorithms for the problem, when the bidders' values for the item are independently drawn from the same continuous distribution. More precisely, we design polynomial-time algorithms for the white-box model, where the distribution is provided directly as part of the input, and query-efficient algorithms for the black-box model, where the distribution is accessed via oracle calls. Our results settle the computational complexity of the problem for bidders with i.i.d. values.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Approximate Envy-Free Allocations up to any $k$ Goods

We study the problem of finding approximate envy-free allocations up to any $k$ goods ($α$-EFkX), when agents have additive values over goods in a bundle. As our main result, we show that for any $k>2$, $\frac{k+1}{k+2}$-EFkX allocations exist for any number of agents, and can be computed in polynomial time, via an appropriate generalization of the 3PA algorithm of [Amanatidis et al., 2024]. An immediate corollary of this result is that $3/4$-EF2X allocations exist for any number of agents; in contrast, $2/3$-EFX allocations are only known to exist for up to 7 agents. We improve this latter result by devising an algorithm that achieves $2/3$-EFX for 8 agents. We also consider EFkX graph orientations; we prove that such orientations do not always exist, and that deciding their existence is NP-complete, thereby generalizing the corresponding result of [Christodoulou et., 2023] for $k=1$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Proportionality Degree in Participatory Budgeting

We initiate the study of the proportionality degree for participatory budgeting, with a particular focus on two popular methods: the Method of Equal Shares (MES) and Phragmen's Sequential Rule. Among other results, we derive tight bounds (up to small constant factors) on the proportionality degree of these two rules, which showcase that, despite MES satisfying stronger axiomatic guarantees, the two rules have the same proportionality degree from a quantitative perspective. We complement our theoretical findings with an extensive experimental evaluation on real-world participatory budgeting datasets, the results of which closely mirror those of our developed theory. Our experiments also provide more insights into the comparisons between the rules.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

A Theoretical Approach to Stablecoin Design via Price Windows

In this paper, we explore the short- and long-term stability of backed stablecoins offering constant mint and redeem prices to all agents. We refer to such designs as price window-based, since the mint and redeem prices constrain the stablecoin's market equilibrium. We show that, without secondary stabilization mechanisms, price window designs cannot achieve both short- and long-term stability unless they are backed by already-stable reserves. In particular, the mechanism faces a tradeoff: either risk eventual reserve depletion through persistent arbitrage by a speculator, or widen the distance between mint and redeem prices enough to disincentivize arbitrage. In the latter case, however, the market price of the stablecoin inherits the volatility of its backing asset, with fluctuations that can be proportional to the backing asset's own volatility.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

The Distortion of Stable Matching

We initiate the study of distortion in stable matching. Concretely, we aim to design algorithms that have limited access to the agents' cardinal preferences and compute stable matchings of high quality with respect to some aggregate objective, e.g., the social welfare. Our first result is a strong impossibility: the classic Deferred Acceptance (DA) algorithm of Gale and Shapley [1962], as well as any deterministic algorithm that relies solely on ordinal information about the agents' preferences, has unbounded distortion. To circumvent this impossibility, we consider algorithms that either (a) use randomization or (b) perform a small number of value queries to the agents' cardinal preferences. In the former case, we prove that a simple randomized version of the DA algorithm achieves a distortion of $2$, and that this is optimal among all randomized stable matching algorithms. For the latter case, we prove that the same bound of $2$ can be achieved with only $1$ query per agent, and improving upon this bound requires $Ω(\log n)$ queries per agent. We further show that this query bound is asymptotically optimal for any constant approximation: for any $\varepsilon >0$, there exists an algorithm which uses $O(\log n /\varepsilon^2)$ queries, and achieves a distortion of $1+\varepsilon$. Moreover, under natural structural restrictions on the instances of the problem, we provide improved upper bounds on the number of queries required for a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation. We complement our main findings above with theoretical and empirical results on the average-case performance of stable matching algorithms, when the preferences of the agents are drawn i.i.d. from a given distribution.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Approximate-EFX Allocations with Ordinal and Limited Cardinal Information

We study a discrete fair division problem where $n$ agents have additive valuation functions over a set of $m$ goods. We focus on the well-known $α$-EFX fairness criterion, according to which the envy of an agent for another agent is bounded multiplicatively by $α$, after the removal of any good from the envied agent's bundle. The vast majority of the literature has studied $α$-EFX allocations under the assumption that full knowledge of the valuation functions of the agents is available. Motivated by the established literature on the distortion in social choice, we instead consider $α$-EFX algorithms that operate under limited information on these functions. In particular, we assume that the algorithm has access to the ordinal preference rankings, and is allowed to make a small number of queries to obtain further access to the underlying values of the agents for the goods. We show (near-optimal) tradeoffs between the values of $α$ and the number of queries required to achieve those, with a particular focus on constant EFX approximations. We also consider two interesting special cases, namely instances with a constant number of agents, or with two possible values, and provide improved positive results.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Equilibrium Computation in First-Price Auctions with Correlated Priors

We consider the computational complexity of computing Bayes-Nash equilibria in first-price auctions, where the bidders' values for the item are drawn from a general (possibly correlated) joint distribution. We show that when the values and the bidding space are discrete, determining the existence of a pure Bayes-Nash equilibrium is NP-hard. This is the first hardness result in the literature of the problem that does not rely on assumptions of subjectivity of the priors, or convoluted tie-breaking rules. We then present two main approaches for achieving positive results, via bid sparsification and via bid densification. The former is more combinatorial and is based on enumeration techniques, whereas the latter makes use of the continuous theory of the problem developed in the economics literature. Using these approaches, we develop polynomial-time approximation algorithms for computing equilibria in symmetric settings or settings with a fixed number of bidders, for different (discrete or continuous) variants of the auction.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Utilitarian Distortion with Predictions

We study the utilitarian distortion of social choice mechanisms under the recently proposed learning-augmented framework where some (possibly unreliable) predicted information about the preferences of the agents is given as input. In particular, we consider two fundamental social choice problems: single-winner voting and one-sided matching. In these settings, the ordinal preferences of the agents over the alternatives (either candidates or items) is known, and some prediction about their underlying cardinal values is also provided. The goal is to leverage the prediction to achieve improved distortion guarantees when it is accurate, while simultaneously still achieving reasonable worst-case bounds when it is not. This leads to the notions of consistency and robustness, and the quest to achieve the best possible tradeoffs between the two. We show tight tradeoffs between the consistency and robustness of ordinal mechanisms for single-winner voting and one-sided matching, for different levels of information provided by as prediction.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Optimal Metric Distortion for Matching on the Line

We study the distortion of one-sided and two-sided matching problems on the line. In the one-sided case, $n$ agents need to be matched to $n$ items, and each agent's cost in a matching is their distance from the item they were matched to. We propose an algorithm that is provided only with ordinal information regarding the agents' preferences (each agent's ranking of the items from most- to least-preferred) and returns a matching aiming to minimize the social cost with respect to the agents' true (cardinal) costs. We prove that our algorithm simultaneously achieves the best-possible approximation of $3$ (known as distortion) with respect to a variety of social cost measures which include the utilitarian and egalitarian social cost. In the two-sided case, where the agents need be matched to $n$ other agents and both sides report their ordinal preferences over each other, we show that it is always possible to compute an optimal matching. In fact, we show that this optimal matching can be achieved using even less information, and we provide bounds regarding the sufficient number of queries.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

On the Computation of Equilibria in Discrete First-Price Auctions

We study the computational complexity of computing Bayes-Nash equilibria in first-price auctions with discrete value distributions and discrete bidding space, under general subjective beliefs. It is known that such auctions do not always have pure equilibria. In this paper, we prove that the problem of deciding their existence is NP-complete, even for approximate equilibria. On the other hand, it can be shown that mixed equilibria are guaranteed to exist; however, their computational complexity has not been studied before. We establish the PPAD-completeness of computing a mixed equilibrium and we complement this by an efficient algorithm for finding symmetric approximate equilibria in the special case of iid priors. En route to these results, we develop a computational equivalence framework between continuous and discrete first-price auctions, which can be of independent interest, and which allows us to transfer existing positive and negative results from one setting to the other. Finally, we show that correlated equilibria of the auction can be computed in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

On the Potential and Limitations of Proxy Voting: Delegation with Incomplete Votes

We study elections where voters are faced with the challenge of expressing preferences over an extreme number of issues under consideration. This is largely motivated by emerging blockchain governance systems, which include voters with different weights and a massive number of community generated proposals. In such scenarios, it is natural to expect that voters will have incomplete preferences, as they may only be able to evaluate or be confident about a very small proportion of the alternatives. As a result, the election outcome may be significantly affected, leading to suboptimal decisions. Our central inquiry revolves around whether delegation of ballots to proxies possessing greater expertise or a more comprehensive understanding of the voters' preferences can lead to outcomes with higher legitimacy and enhanced voters' satisfaction in elections where voters submit incomplete preferences. To explore its aspects, we introduce the following model: potential proxies advertise their ballots over multiple issues, and each voter either delegates to a seemingly attractive proxy or casts a ballot directly. We identify necessary and sufficient conditions that could lead to a socially better outcome by leveraging the participation of proxies. We accompany our theoretical findings with experiments on instances derived from real datasets. Overall, our results enhance the understanding of the power of delegation towards improving election outcomes.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Truthful Interval Covering

We initiate the study of a novel problem in mechanism design without money, which we term Truthful Interval Covering (TIC). An instance of TIC consists of a set of agents each associated with an individual interval on a line, and the objective is to decide where to place a covering interval to minimize the total social or egalitarian cost of the agents, which is determined by the intersection of this interval with their individual ones. This fundamental problem can model situations of provisioning a public good, such as the use of power generators to prevent or mitigate load shedding in developing countries. In the strategic version of the problem, the agents wish to minimize their individual costs, and might misreport the position and/or length of their intervals to achieve that. Our goal is to design truthful mechanisms to prevent such strategic misreports and achieve good approximations to the best possible social or egalitarian cost. We consider the fundamental setting of known intervals with equal lengths and provide tight bounds on the approximation ratios achieved by truthful deterministic mechanisms. For the social cost, we also design a randomized truthful mechanism that outperforms all possible deterministic ones. Finally, we highlight a plethora of natural extensions of our model for future work, as well as some natural limitations of those settings.

cs.GT↗