Ariel Fogel | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

BadEngram: Backdoor Attack on Gated Memory Components in LLMs

To expand open-weight models' capacity without proportionally increasing computation, recent language models incorporate gated parametric memories that retrieve learned values and inject them into intermediate representations. Despite these efficiency benefits, such modules create a distinct attack surface: their parameters can be modified independently of the backbone while directly shaping its computation. We introduce BadEngram, a post-training attack that exploits this surface to implant persistent, trigger-dependent behavior while leaving conventional backbone weights and the execution graph unchanged. We first establish the attack's feasibility and causally characterize its mechanism in a controlled Engram model, where BadEngram achieves 96.6% ASR on triggered inputs while limiting false activation on matched trigger-free inputs to 0.1% and preserving 99.6% clean accuracy. Replacing the retrieved memory values with their clean counterparts or closing the memory gates reduces ASR to at most 0.32%, confirming that the backdoor is expressed through the gated-memory pathway. We then test whether this vulnerability extends to production scale in Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's native Per-Layer Embedding subsystem. Using independently trained checkpoints for the two benchmarks, BadEngram achieves 50.4% ASR on HarmBench and 60.0% on AdvBench, while dormant-condition ASR remains 0.9% and 0.0%, respectively. These results identify native gated-memory parameters as a security-critical part of the model whose integrity cannot be inferred from an unchanged backbone.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Inference-Time Backdoors via Chat Templates: From LLM Supply Chains to Agentic System Compromise

Open-weight language models are increasingly used in production settings, raising new security challenges. One prominent threat is backdoor attacks, in which adversaries embed hidden behaviors that activate under specific conditions. Previous work has assumed that adversaries have access to training pipelines or deployment infrastructure. We propose a novel attack surface requiring neither: the "chat template". Chat templates are executable programs invoked at every inference call, often implemented in Jinja2, that occupy a privileged position between user input and model processing. We show that an adversary who distributes a model with a maliciously modified template can implant an inference-time backdoor without modifying model weights, poisoning training data, or controlling runtime infrastructure. We evaluate this attack across three deployment tiers. At the LLM level, triggered backdoors reduce factual accuracy from 90% to 15% on average and induce attacker-controlled URL emission with success rates exceeding 80%, while benign inputs show no measurable degradation; these results hold across eighteen models. At the agent level, template backdoors hijack tool-use across two benchmarks spanning 3,868 episodes, bypassing every tested injection defense offered by the benchmarks while remaining fully dormant absent the trigger. At the multi-agent system level, we demonstrate how a single poisoned artifact compromises a real-world agentic deployment and propagates supply-chain code poisoning downstream. The poisoned artifacts evade all security scans on the largest open model distribution platform; and because the payload is rendered by the template before user input is processed, it is architecturally unreachable by input-level defenses such as prompt injection guardrails. These results establish chat templates as a reliable and undefended attack in the open-weight AI supply chain.

cs.CR↗