arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Anna Gogleva

Publications and source records attributed to Anna Gogleva.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Treating the Symptom, Missing the Cause: Anatomy of a Scientific Reasoning Failure

Scientific agents can find interventions that work without understanding why they do. We study this failure mode in controlled synthetic regulatory systems, where agents must experimentally identify a hidden fault and rescue the resulting phenotype. Across seven LLMs, every model restores the healthy phenotypes more often than it identifies the fault. Claude Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6 rescue every organism while diagnosing only 55% and 35% of them. This failure is not simply due to insufficient exploration or unavailable evidence. In most cases, the cause is experimentally identifiable, and agents encounter evidence that distinguishes competing causes in 91% of relevant sessions, and still frequently misdiagnose the system. Targeted probes reveal where experimental reasoning breaks down. Models reliably interpret decisive evidence and revise hypotheses when the causal comparison is explicit, and can locate that evidence within a full experimental record. However, they struggle to predict the outcome of the experiment under each competing cause, a necessary step in using the observed result to distinguish between them. Agents can therefore gather the right evidence and still infer the wrong cause. As AI systems take on a growing role in synthesising scientific evidence, these findings highlight the need to evaluate how they use evidence to reach causal conclusions, alongside whether their interventions succeed.

cs.AI↗

LUCA: A Synthetic World for Experimental Reasoning

An experimental agent can succeed for the wrong reasons. Evaluations, however, often focus on the outcome, not the experiments, evidence, and inferences that produced it. We introduce LUCA, a configurable synthetic world for evaluating this process under fully known ground truth. Agents learn unknown regulatory systems through budgeted experimentation, then predict unseen interventions, diagnose hidden faults, and attempt rescues. This setup allows us to evaluate experiment selection, prediction, diagnosis, and intervention separately. Across seven frontier LLMs and three baselines, these capabilities dissociate sharply. Agents frequently rescue malfunctioning systems while diagnosing the wrong fault; diagnosis varies 7x across models while prediction varies only 1.4x. Models also adopt surprisingly different experimental strategies, and greater exploration does not reliably yield better performance. In one failure mode, agents often perform the experiment needed to distinguish competing causes, but still fail to use the resulting evidence. LUCA turns these hidden failures into measurable behaviours, providing a controlled environment to study where experimental agents succeed and fail. Code: https://github.com/RelationRx/luca.

cs.AI↗

Tiny Moves: Game-based Hypothesis Refinement

Most machine learning approaches to scientific discovery frame hypotheses as end-to-end predictions, obscuring the incremental structure of scientific reasoning. We propose The Hypothesis Game, a symbolic formalism for hypothesis refinement in which LLM agents operate on a shared hypothesis state using a fixed grammar of reasoning moves. The framework is motivated by the observation that scientific progress often proceeds through small, localized revisions, grounded in domain context, rather than extensive rewrites. We instantiate a minimal game with LLM agents and evaluate it on pathway-level mechanistic refinement tasks. In the primary setting of corruption recovery, where hypotheses contain controlled errors, the game-based approach consistently removes more errors and achieves higher precision than strong prompting baselines, while preserving valid structure through incremental edits. In a secondary reconstruction setting from partial cues, it performs comparably to the strongest baseline, indicating that explicit move-based refinement remains competitive even when ground-truth recovery is difficult. These findings support game-based reasoning as a principled route to more controllable, interpretable, and transferable hypothesis refinement systems for scientific discovery.

cs.MA↗

MOOMIN: Deep Molecular Omics Network for Anti-Cancer Drug Combination Therapy

We propose the molecular omics network (MOOMIN) a multimodal graph neural network used by AstraZeneca oncologists to predict the synergy of drug combinations for cancer treatment. Our model learns drug representations at multiple scales based on a drug-protein interaction network and metadata. Structural properties of compounds and proteins are encoded to create vertex features for a message-passing scheme that operates on the bipartite interaction graph. Propagated messages form multi-resolution drug representations which we utilized to create drug pair descriptors. By conditioning the drug combination representations on the cancer cell type we define a synergy scoring function that can inductively score unseen pairs of drugs. Experimental results on the synergy scoring task demonstrate that MOOMIN outperforms state-of-the-art graph fingerprinting, proximity preserving node embedding, and existing deep learning approaches. Further results establish that the predictive performance of our model is robust to hyperparameter changes. We demonstrate that the model makes high-quality predictions over a wide range of cancer cell line tissues, out-of-sample predictions can be validated with external synergy databases, and that the proposed model is data efficient at learning.

cs.LG↗

OntoMerger: An Ontology Integration Library for Deduplicating and Connecting Knowledge Graph Nodes

Duplication of nodes is a common problem encountered when building knowledge graphs (KGs) from heterogeneous datasets, where it is crucial to be able to merge nodes having the same meaning. OntoMerger is a Python ontology integration library whose functionality is to deduplicate KG nodes. Our approach takes a set of KG nodes, mappings and disconnected hierarchies and generates a set of merged nodes together with a connected hierarchy. In addition, the library provides analytic and data testing functionalities that can be used to fine-tune the inputs, further reducing duplication, and to increase connectivity of the output graph. OntoMerger can be applied to a wide variety of ontologies and KGs. In this paper we introduce OntoMerger and illustrate its functionality on a real-world biomedical KG.

cs.AI↗

ChemicalX: A Deep Learning Library for Drug Pair Scoring

In this paper, we introduce ChemicalX, a PyTorch-based deep learning library designed for providing a range of state of the art models to solve the drug pair scoring task. The primary objective of the library is to make deep drug pair scoring models accessible to machine learning researchers and practitioners in a streamlined framework.The design of ChemicalX reuses existing high level model training utilities, geometric deep learning, and deep chemistry layers from the PyTorch ecosystem. Our system provides neural network layers, custom pair scoring architectures, data loaders, and batch iterators for end users. We showcase these features with example code snippets and case studies to highlight the characteristics of ChemicalX. A range of experiments on real world drug-drug interaction, polypharmacy side effect, and combination synergy prediction tasks demonstrate that the models available in ChemicalX are effective at solving the pair scoring task. Finally, we show that ChemicalX could be used to train and score machine learning models on large drug pair datasets with hundreds of thousands of compounds on commodity hardware.

cs.LG↗