Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency As An Experience-Restricted Constraint On Visual Temporal Resolution: What Does And Does Not Change It
Experience-dependent plasticity is fundamental to adaptive behaviour, yet the conditions under which basic sensory timing can be modified in adulthood remain poorly specified. Critical flicker fusion frequency (CFFF), the threshold at which flicker is perceived as continuous, is unusually informative here: what fails to change it is as well documented as what does. Reviewing the stability and training literature, we argue CFFF is best characterised neither as non-plastic nor as held near a physiological ceiling, but as modifiable only by a specific class of experience, not by amount. Repeated testing, cognitive training without temporal content, and incoherent-flicker exposure leave the threshold unchanged regardless of duration. By contrast, a narrow class of perceptual-learning paradigms -- pairing coherent directional motion with a task-relevant target -- reportedly raises the threshold substantially, with gains retained at one year in a small subsample. Gains are largest below typical values, as in amblyopia, and absent in normally sighted observers under the same protocol. Three qualifications apply: the evidence rests on small samples; the threshold-raising paradigms have been assessed almost exclusively with heterochromatic flicker photometry rather than luminance-defined CFFF, leaving construct equivalence unestablished; and a minority of untrained controls show comparable changes. We examine whether the restriction originates at peripheral, thalamocortical, or cortical levels; available data do not adjudicate between them. Functional arguments for why such a restriction might be adaptive are offered as rationales, not evidence. Proposed links to working-memory precision and metacognition are stated as predictions; the first test of them was largely negative.