arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Anika Slizewski

Publications and source records attributed to Anika Slizewski.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A distribution-function estimate of the Milky Way mass profile from outer halo stars in DESI DR2

We present measurements of the Milky Way mass using blue horizontal-branch (BHB) and RR Lyrae (RRL) stars from the second data release of DESI (DR2), covering its first three years of operations. We employ 279 BHBs and 213 RRLs at $\sim\!50$--$80$\,kpc from the Galactic center, selected from catalogs roughly twice as large as those of DESI DR1, used in our previous mass measurement. We apply the Galactic Mass Estimator (GME), a hierarchical Bayesian framework that assumes power-law forms for the potential and the tracer density, and accounts for distance and velocity uncertainties. Validating the method on 24 AuriDESI mock catalogs (six Auriga halos at four viewing angles), we find that it overestimates the enclosed mass by $\sim\!15\%$ at 80\,kpc, and correct our results accordingly. We obtain $M(<80\,{\rm kpc}) = 0.64^{+0.06}_{-0.06}$ and $0.53^{+0.05}_{-0.05} \times 10^{12}\,M_\odot$ for BHBs and RRLs, respectively, while including Sagittarius stream stars lowers these masses by $\sim\!10$\%. Extrapolating to 100\,kpc, we obtain $M(<100\,{\rm kpc}) = 0.74^{+0.07}_{-0.07}$ and $0.62^{+0.06}_{-0.07} \times 10^{12}\,M_\odot$, and anchoring an NFW halo to our GME constraints at 65\,kpc yields virial masses of $M_{200} = 1.12^{+0.14}_{-0.12}$ and $0.89^{+0.11}_{-0.10} \times 10^{12}\,M_\odot$. BHBs yield systematically higher masses than RRLs across the full radial range, reflecting the impact of tracer choice even within a single method. This work is part of a wider DESI DR2 Key Project effort to measure the Milky Way mass and constrain systematics arising from different samples and methodologies.

astro-ph.GA↗

Galactic Mass Estimates using Dwarf Galaxies as Kinematic Tracers

New mass estimates and cumulative mass profiles with Bayesian credible regions (c.r.) for the Milky Way (MW) are found using the Galactic Mass Estimator (GME) code and dwarf galaxy (DG) kinematic data from multiple sources. GME takes a hierarchical Bayesian approach to simultaneously estimate the true positions and velocities of the DGs, their velocity anisotropy, and the model parameters for the Galaxy's total gravitational potential. In this study, we incorporate meaningful prior information from past studies and simulations. The prior distributions for the physical model are informed by the results of Eadie & Juric (2019), which used globular clusters instead of DGs, as well as by the subhalo distributions of the Ananke Gaia-like surveys from Feedback In Realistic Environments-2 (Fire-2) cosmological simulations (see Sanderson et al. 2020). Using DGs beyond 45 kpc, we report median and 95% c.r estimates for $r_{200}$ = 212.8 (191.12,238.44) kpc, and for the total enclosed mass $M_{200}$ = 1.19 (0.87,1.68)$\times10^{12}M_{\odot}$ (adopting $Δ_c=200$). Median mass estimates at specific radii are also reported (e.g., $M(<50\text{ kpc})=0.52\times10^{12}M_{\odot}$ and $M(100\text{ kpc})=0.78\times10^{12}M_{\odot}$). Estimates are comparable to other recent studies using GAIA DR2 and DGs, but notably different from the estimates of Eadie & Juric (2019). We perform a sensitivity analysis to investigate whether individual DGs and/or a more massive Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) on the order of $10^{11}M_{\odot}$ may be affecting our mass estimates. We find possible supporting evidence for the idea that some DGs are affected by a massive LMC and are not in equilibrium with the MW.

astro-ph.GA↗