arXiv subjects

Andrew Ang

Publications and source records attributed to Andrew Ang.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

SWE-InfraBench: Evaluating Language Models on Cloud Infrastructure Code

Building infrastructure-as-code (IaC) in cloud computing is a critical task, underpinning the reliability, scalability, and security of modern software systems. Despite the remarkable progress of large language models (LLMs) in software engineering -- demonstrated across many dedicated benchmarks -- their capabilities in developing IaC remain underexplored. Unlike existing IaC benchmarks that predominantly center on declarative paradigms such as Terraform and involve generating entire codebases from scratch, our benchmark reflects the incremental code edits common in enterprise development with imperative tools like the AWS CDK. We present SWE-InfraBench, a diverse evaluation dataset sourced from dozens of real-world IaC codebases that challenge LLMs to perform realistic code modifications in AWS CDK repositories. Each example requires models to implement changes to existing codebases based on natural language instructions, with success determined by passing provided test cases. These tasks demand sophisticated reasoning about cloud resource dependencies and implementation patterns beyond conventional code generation challenges. Our evaluation results reveal significant limitations in current LLMs showing that even state-of-the-art systems struggle with many tasks -- the best model, Sonnet 3.7, succeeds in only 34\% of cases, while specialized reasoning models like DeepSeek R1 achieve just 24% success. The SWE-InfraBench dataset is available at: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/64e59070fd51c0278560b01eb5dc4f3c447d5268cdabe5a350d2969e4413fea5

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

The Self Driving Portfolio: Agentic Architecture for Institutional Asset Management

Agentic AI shifts the investor's role from analytical execution to oversight. We present an agentic strategic asset allocation pipeline in which approximately 50 specialized agents produce capital market assumptions, construct portfolios using over 20 competing methods, and critique and vote on each other's output. A researcher agent proposes new portfolio construction methods not yet represented, and a meta-agent compares past forecasts against realized returns and rewrites agent code and prompts to improve future performance. The entire pipeline is governed by the Investment Policy Statement--the same document that guides human portfolio managers can now constrain and direct autonomous agents.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2021

Optimal Claiming of Social Security Benefits

Using a lifecycle framework with Epstein-Zin (1989) utility and a mixed-integer optimization approach, we compute the optimal age to claim Social Security benefits. Taking advantage of homogeneity, a sufficient statistic is the ratio of wealth to the primary insurance amount (PIA). If the investor's wealth to PIA ratio exceeds a certain threshold, individuals should defer Social Security for at least a year. The optimal threshold depends on mortality assumptions and an individual's utility preferences, but is less sensitive to capital market assumptions. The threshold wealth to PIA ratio increases from 5.5 for men and 5.2 for women at age 62 to 11.1 for men and 10.4 for women at age 69. Below the threshold wealth to PIA ratio, individuals claim Social Security to raise consumption. Above this level, investors can afford to fund consumption out of wealth for at least one year, and then claim a higher benefit.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2021

Portfolio Performance Attribution via Shapley Value

We consider an investment process that includes a number of features, each of which can be active or inactive. Our goal is to attribute or decompose an achieved performance to each of these features, plus a baseline value. There are many ways to do this, which lead to potentially different attributions in any specific case. We argue that a specific attribution method due to Shapley is the preferred method, and discuss methods that can be used to compute this attribution exactly, or when that is not practical, approximately.

q-fin.CP↗

arXiv2020

Tax-Aware Portfolio Construction via Convex Optimization

We describe an optimization-based tax-aware portfolio construction method that adds tax liability to standard Markowitz-based portfolio construction. Our method produces a trade list that specifies the number of shares to buy of each asset and the number of shares to sell from each tax lot held. To avoid wash sales (in which some realized capital losses are disallowed), we assume that we trade monthly, and cannot simultaneously buy and sell the same asset. The tax-aware portfolio construction problem is not convex, but it becomes convex when we specify, for each asset, whether we buy or sell it. It can be solved using standard mixed-integer convex optimization methods at the cost of very long solve times for some problem instances. We present a custom convex relaxation of the problem that borrows curvature from the risk model. This relaxation can provide a good approximation of the true tax liability, while greatly enhancing computational tractability. This method requires the solution of only two convex optimization problems: the first determines whether we buy or sell each asset, and the second generates the final trade list. In our numerical experiments, our method almost always solves the nonconvex problem to optimality, and when it does not, it produces a trade list very close to optimal. Backtests show that the performance of our method is indistinguishable from that obtained using a globally optimal solution, but with significantly reduced computational effort.

math.OC↗