arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Alina Hagen

Publications and source records attributed to Alina Hagen.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Scale-CDA: A Scalable Aftermarket Platform to Democratize Cooperative Driving Automation in Production Cars

Scaling cooperative driving automation (CDA) to production passenger vehicles requires an affordable retrofit platform that can accommodate heterogeneous OEM Controller Area Network (CAN) signals and advanced driver-assistance system (ADAS) commands. Scale-CDA addresses this challenge by building on OpenDBC and openpilot, which provide vehicle interfaces and Level-2 automation support for more than 300 car models. The proposed open-hardware and open-software prototype integrates commodity edge computing, camera sensing, Wi-Fi, cellular communication, and a CAN adapter for less than $1,000. It exchanges telemetry and cooperative messages through MQTT over Wi-Fi~6 or LTE, avoiding costly DSRC or C-V2X sidelink radios. In moving-vehicle experiments, Wi-Fi~6 achieved a mean round-trip time of 5.25~ms and mean negotiated physical-layer rates of 98.51~Mb/s for transmission and 109.17~Mb/s for reception, with approximately 2% of observations exceeding 50~ms. These results demonstrate feasibility for non-safety-critical CDA applications. Scale-CDA also introduces a Generative AI interface that combines camera observations, CAN data, and connectivity messages through the Model Context Protocol. The model generates semantic message intents and structured MetaActions, while deterministic adapters validate and encode cooperative messages and map admissible actions to existing Level-2 functions without allowing direct actuator control. An on-road construction-zone demonstration validates driver advisory, message generation, and speed-related MetaAction pathways. Scale-CDA provides a reproducible platform for connectivity and GenAI research on supported production vehicles.

cs.ET

Do VLMs See What Sensors Feel? A Scalable Expert-Guided Design for Wheelchair Accessibility Assessment from Street View

Assessing built-environment interaction, such as wheelchair accessibility, is difficult because real-world mobility is shaped by distributed, context-dependent, and temporary barriers that are hard to capture at scale. To support scalable assessment, this paper examines whether vision-language models (VLMs) can identify accessibility barriers from Google Street View (GSV) imagery. We propose an expert-guided retrieval-augmented framework that combines GSV images, ADA-informed guidance, and expert-derived rubrics to evaluate accessibility dimensions. We collect a campus-scale dataset at the University of Florida, linking 407 unique GSV locations with GPS-derived wheelchair dwell behavior as a mobility-friction signal. Results show that VLM ratings are both negatively correlated and distributionally similar with dwell time, indicating partial but consistent alignment with a behavioral proxy for mobility friction. Visual cue analysis shows that certain environmental objects, such as curb ramps and crosswalks, are associated with higher VLM accessibility scores, while alignment remains limited for subtle surface conditions, transient obstructions, and viewpoint-dependent barriers. Overall, our findings show the potential of expert-guided VLMs for scalable accessibility assessment aligning with sensor-derived indicators of real-world wheelchair navigation.

cs.CV

Politicized Attention Shifts Amplify Polarization in the Information Ecosystem during California Wildfires

Wildfires require governments to communicate under conditions of urgency, uncertainty, and intense public scrutiny, yet such communication now unfolds within a digitally mediated environment shaped by polarization and engagement-based amplification. We analyze over 1.3 million wildfire-related social media posts from California (2016-2025) to examine how institutional actors are evaluated within this landscape. Users' stance toward government is actor-specific: individual political officials are discussed more negatively than operational agencies across federal, state, and local levels, and this gap widens during extreme wildfire events. Moreover, interaction networks become increasingly modular over time, consolidating into polarized communities in which negativity concentrates within cohesive clusters. Engagement-weighted measures show that highly interactive negative content disproportionately shapes visible discourse, while crisis periods redirect attention from emergency agencies to high-profile political figures, reinforcing reputational divergence. These findings indicate that wildfire communication operates within a polarized, engagement-ranked ecosystem in which evaluative tone, network structure, and visibility dynamics jointly shape institutional perception. Effective disaster communication should therefore account for the structural conditions of contemporary digital public communities.

cs.SI