Alexandra Vabnits | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

CDBM: Complexity-Diversity Framework for Building Morphology Analysis

We introduce Complexity-Diversity Building Metrics (CDBM), twelve interpretable descriptors for building massings represented as vertical extrusions. They measure how strongly geometric detail is expressed (complexity) and how unevenly it varies across one- and two-dimensional elements (diversity). Computed for 482,241,306 OpenStreetMap buildings and compared with 3D Building Metrics (3DBM) and the LION shape latent on task-specific samples, CDBM is tested on function, region, contextual relevance, real-generated discrimination, human preference and geometry-conditioned generation. With gradient boosting, CDBM best separates generated from mapped massings and best matches human preference; with logistic regression it matches 3DBM on realism. 3DBM leads on the other three tasks. As generation targets, the descriptors show that models struggle to produce strongly expressed and heterogeneous forms. CDBM complements existing indicators.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

CoMa: Contextual Massing Generation with Vision-Language Models

Context-aware building massing is an important early-stage design task: given a site for buildings, a generated massing should not only fit the target parcel, but also relate to the scale, density, and morphology of its surrounding urban fabric. This task is naturally multimodal, since the target output should remain structured and editable, while the surrounding context, including other buildings or roads, can be represented as vector geometry, map imagery, or three-dimensional views. In this paper, we study contextual massing generation using vision-language models (VLMs) and analyze their performance on this task across different context modalities during training and inference. We assemble an experimental dataset of 12,845 Melbourne massings with parcel contours, structured 3D geometry, neighboring buildings, top-down views, and multi-view 3D context images. We also introduce a learned contextual relevance metric for evaluating whether generated massings are morphologically compatible with their surrounding context. Using Qwen3-VL models, we compare no-context, unimodal-context, and multimodal-context training regimes and evaluate inference performance under controlled combinations of modalities and amounts of context. The results show that model size strongly affects generation quality, multimodal training improves the use of individual modalities, and multimodal inference provides a stronger contextual signal than isolated context inputs.

cs.CV↗