arXiv subjects

Alexandra Schild

Publications and source records attributed to Alexandra Schild.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

What Does Animal Re-Identification Learn? Linear Biological Concepts and Their Origins in Visual Representations

Conservation increasingly relies on camera traps that collect more wildlife imagery than experts can manually analyze, making animal re-identification (Re-ID) essential for monitoring individuals and populations. Yet understanding which cues drive model decisions is challenging for ViT-based Re-ID models, whose metric-learning objectives provide no explicit supervision for biological concepts. We ask whether such models nonetheless organize their representations along biologically meaningful axes. Using a DINOv3 backbone fine-tuned for Western lowland gorilla Re-ID with triplet-margin loss, we find that sex and age emerge as linear directions that generalize to held-out individuals, reaching up to 0.91 AUROC and being recoverable from a single image per individual. Activation steering further shows that the sex direction is causally used by the model, flipping a significant fraction of predictions to the opposite sex. Comparing off-the-shelf and fine-tuned backbones shows that Re-ID training does not create these concepts, but relocates them across the network. Finally, data attribution reveals that the representation we find reflects a graded biological axis, is redundantly encoded across the population and shaped by visually ambiguous individuals. Together, these findings show how interpretability can uncover both the biological structure and failure modes of Re-ID representations, providing a step toward auditable computer vision for wildlife monitoring.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

SVG-Score: Human-Aligned Evaluation of Text-to-SVG Generation

Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) generation is attracting increasing attention as generative models improve in expressiveness and controllability. Progress, however, is held back by the lack of domain-specific evaluation protocols: current practice relies on metrics designed for natural images, most notably CLIPScore, which was never trained on vector graphics and aligns only partially with human judgment. We introduce \textbf{\ours}, a human-aligned evaluation framework for text-to-SVG generation. Through controlled caption and image perturbations, we first show that CLIP-based scores barely react to the errors SVG generators actually make, such as wrong colors, counts, and spatial relations, and that off-the-shelf Vision-Language Model (VLM) judges, while more sensitive, respond unevenly across error types and SVG styles. We then introduce a human-annotated dataset for \textit{Semantic Alignment}, measuring how faithfully a generated SVG reflects its caption. Building on it, we develop two complementary evaluators: CLIP scorers adapted to vector graphics and then aligned to human preferences, for fast large-scale evaluation, and a VLM judge trained with supervised fine-tuning and reward-shaped reinforcement learning, for more expressive and interpretable assessment. Using both, we benchmark major open-source, commercial, and optimization-based SVG generators on an independent caption set.

cs.AI↗