Aleix Puig-Barbe | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Compiling, Validating, and Using Human Reference Atlas Cell Type Annotation Crosswalks

The Human Reference Atlas (HRA) v2.5 includes 4,807 anatomical structures, 1,347 cell types, and 2,215 biomarkers (genes, proteins, lipids); 81 organs with 1,392 anatomical structures modeled in three dimensions (3D). Mapping new data into the HRA requires 3D spatial registration and/or cell type annotation (CTann). Many CTann tools exist but few use cell type names linked to Cell Ontology (CL), making comparisons across tools, tissues, and organs difficult. The HRA supports five transcriptomics CTann tools (Azimuth, CellTypist, popV, FR-Match, Pan-Human Azimuth), four sc-proteomics CTann tools (DeepCell Types, DeepCell Types-HuBMAP, Robust Image-Based Cell Annotator [RIBCA], and SpaTial cELl LeARning [STELLAR]), plus a Cell Distance Explorer (CDE) Spatial Omics collection covering previously published annotations across 12 tissue types with 47,349,496 cells. Assigned cell types differ in number, resolution, and coverage. This paper details how 10 crosswalks were constructed, validated, and used to compile a "Supertree" that can be used to compare CTann across organs and technologies in support of reference atlas constitution and usage. All data and code can be accessed at https://cns-iu.github.io/hra-ctann-supporting-information.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

The Cell Ontology in the age of single-cell omics

Single-cell omics technologies have transformed our understanding of cellular diversity by enabling high-resolution profiling of individual cells. However, the unprecedented scale and heterogeneity of these datasets demand robust frameworks for data integration and annotation. The Cell Ontology (CL) has emerged as a pivotal resource for achieving FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data principles by providing standardized, species-agnostic terms for canonical cell types - forming a core component of a wide range of platforms and tools. In this paper, we describe the wide variety of uses of CL in these platforms and tools and detail ongoing work to improve and extend CL content including the addition of transcriptomic types, working closely with major atlasing efforts including the Human Cell Atlas and the Brain Initiative Cell Atlas Network to support their needs. We cover the challenges and future plans for harmonising classical and transcriptomic cell type definitions, integrating markers and using Large Language Models (LLMs) to improve content and efficiency of CL workflows.

q-bio.OT↗