arXiv subjects

Aleesha Zainab

Publications and source records attributed to Aleesha Zainab.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

A Channel-Boosted Multi-Agent System with Iterative Consultation for Document Sensitivity Classification

Organizations in critical national infrastructure sectors must assess heterogeneous documents for sensitivity before routing or storage. Manual assessment is slow, inconsistent, and unscalable. Extending our prior leakage-controlled benchmark, BERT established the top single-encoder baseline (89.14% accuracy, 89.33% F1-score under 5-fold cross-validation on the Strategic 16K corpus). However, transformer baselines suffer from a structural limitation: fixed input length truncation discards evidence beyond the retained window-precisely where sensitive cables tend to be longest. We present Channel-Boosted MAS (CB-MAS) and instantiate it as IC-MAS (Iterative Consultation Multi-Agent System) to solve this without long-context computational costs. A Channel Critic Agent learns document-adaptive trust weights governing Gated Channel Boosting between two first-window encoders, while paired Consultation Agents iteratively exchange belief states to reconcile evidence from the beginning and end of long documents. IC-MAS holds computation constant regardless of document length by reconciling fixed windows in a compact representation space. Ablation studies show critic-controlled Channel Boosting provides the bulk of accuracy gains, while consultation recovers recall without precision collapse. Critic-Controlled Gated Channel Boosting with Max-Pool fusion and Blackboard Adaptive Consultation achieves 90.72% accuracy, 91.23% F1-score, 92.01% sensitive recall, and 90.46% sensitive precision, using about 54% less average computation than a fixed-round baseline. Gains over the single-encoder baseline are statistically significant (McNemar's test, p less than 0.000001; paired t-test). We include LIME/SHAP explainability, multi-agent evaluation, and an honest accounting of limitations.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Benchmarking Classical and Transformer-Based Models for Document Sensitivity Classification

Automatic sensitivity classification of organizational documents is a critical yet underserved problem, where the consequences of misclassification range from regulatory violations to security breaches. While AI-based approaches offer a scalable alternative to manual review, their reliability depends fundamentally on the integrity of training data. A pervasive but underreported problem in this domain is label leakage: residual classification markers embedded within document bodies that allow models to exploit surface shortcuts rather than learning genuine content-based sensitivity signals, producing performance estimates that are inflated and unreliable. This paper addresses this problem by introducing Strategic 16K, a carefully constructed, leakage-controlled corpus of 16,000 diplomatic cables sourced from the WikiLeaks Public Library of US Diplomacy (PlusD), and presents a systematic benchmark evaluating six model architectures spanning classical machine learning and transformer-based approaches. We document an extended leakage removal protocol that identifies and eliminates three categories of residual classification markers embedded within document bodies. On the clean benchmark, BERT achieves the strongest performance (Accuracy = 89.14%, F1 = 89.33%), followed by ELECTRA (Accuracy = 88.57%, F1 = 88.90%). Among classical models, TF-IDF with Logistic Regression achieves the strongest performance at significantly lower computational cost. These results constitute the first fully reproducible sensitivity classification benchmark constructed under explicit leakage-controlled conditions from WikiLeaks PlusD.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Advances in LLMs with Focus on Reasoning, Adaptability, Efficiency and Ethics

This survey paper outlines the key developments in the field of Large Language Models (LLMs), including enhancements to their reasoning skills, adaptability to various tasks, increased computational efficiency, and the ability to make ethical decisions. The techniques that have been most effective in bridging the gap between human and machine communications include the Chain-of-Thought prompting, Instruction Tuning, and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback. The improvements in multimodal learning and few-shot or zero-shot techniques have further empowered LLMs to handle complex jobs with minor input. A significant focus is placed on efficiency, detailing scaling strategies, optimization techniques, and the influential Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture, which strategically routes inputs to specialized subnetworks to boost predictive accuracy, while optimizing resource allocation. This survey also offers a broader perspective on recent advancements in LLMs, going beyond isolated aspects such as model architecture or ethical concerns. Additionally, it explores the role of LLMs in Agentic AI and their use as Autonomous Decision-Making Systems, and categorizes emerging methods that enhance LLM reasoning, efficiency, and ethical alignment. The survey also identifies underexplored areas such as interpretability, cross-modal integration, and sustainability. While significant advancements have been made in LLMs, challenges such as high computational costs, biases, and ethical risks remain. Overcoming these requires a focus on bias mitigation, transparent decision-making, and explicit ethical guidelines. Future research will generally focus on enhancing the model's ability to handle multiple inputs, thereby making it more intelligent, safe, and reliable.

cs.CL↗