arXiv subjects

Alan Ai

Publications and source records attributed to Alan Ai.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Event-Time Confounding Under Bursty Human Dynamics

Studies of digital behavior often align users at moments they choose, such as opening an AI assistant, clicking a recommendation, or visiting a product page, and interpret higher activity afterward as an event effect. We show how this creates an endogenous time zero: the event occurs during an ongoing task episode, so the aligned curve can trace episode continuation rather than a response to the event. In same-user, cross-surface web logs, AI, shopping, news, coding, and reference events are all preceded by broad activity increases that peak before time zero. Our strongest test uses known-null timestamps that cause nothing. Among the 5.8% of AI responses meeting strict pre-event activity and washout criteria, these timestamps show 3.42 times the post-event search activity of a within-user placebo, compared with 4.32 times for real events. The fraction of excess reproduced by the known null falls from 0.56 at detectably active moments to -0.04 at quiet moments, where the design detects none. We formalize this episode-selection bias, prove that a single-surface event window cannot separate it from a genuine effect without additional assumptions, and show in zero-effect simulations why user fixed effects and coarse activity matching can fail: the confound is within-user and time-varying. We provide a diagnostic protocol, public-data benchmarks, and burstcheck, a lightweight audit tool. User-timed events may have real effects, but post-event volume does not identify them by default; studies should compare similar episodes with and without the event.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

The New Shape of Search: How Conversational AI Recomposes Information Seeking

The familiar search journey begins with a query and moves outward into documents, and conversational AI is commonly imagined at its mouth: ask first, then click out. Linking captured prompts and responses to the same panelists' observed searches and pageviews, and reconstructing inactivity-defined cross-surface temporal sessions (standalone assistant surfaces; search-embedded AI such as AI Overviews and AI Mode is out of scope, since it co-occurs with the results page), we find the observed journeys more often run the other way. Content usually follows search but more often precedes assistant use. Within the same panelist, the paired difference-of-directions between the two anchors is +20.6 [19.9, 21.3] percentage points; it persists within every coarse destination-domain stratum we can observe (semantic task and task-stage matching remain unresolved), and every headline result replicates in a second, adjacent month. Search tends to anchor the front of the observed journey; assistants sit deeper inside it. Assistant sessions are also far more often self-contained. User-weighted, 34.1% [33.5, 34.7] of assistant-containing sessions show no observed external web step (AI-first 10.5% [10.2, 10.9], AI-last 18.3% [17.8, 18.7], bridge/interleaved 37.1% [36.5, 37.7]), against 19.5% [19.2, 19.8] contained for search-centered sessions of the same users, a within-user contrast of +13.0 [12.5, 13.6] percentage points. We call this difference recomposition: activity is distributed differently across dialogue, search, and browsing, without implying that assistant use caused the difference. Assistant-contained also does not mean resolved: timestamps alone cannot establish one task, satisfaction, or completion. The result is a cross-surface topology of the emerging search journey and a discipline for distinguishing observed containment from inferred resolution.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

From Prompt to Purchase: How AI Brand Recommendations Move Consumers on the Open Web

When a conversational assistant recommends a brand to a user with no recent observed engagement, that user's same-name Google search rises $+4.3$ percentage points (pp) [$3.1$, $5.5$], visits to the brand's own site $+2.4$ pp [$1.4$, $3.5$], and brand-specific retailer-page visits $+1.0$ pp [$0.3$, $1.7$] over matched backward placebos. Recovering that estimate is the work. The mention creates a brand exposure no web log attributes to the assistant, and the naive all-mention funnel that seems to measure it is confounded: many mentions are incidental references to brands the user already uses ("your Netflix download"), whose downstream visits are that existing customer's own behavior and surface as a brand-specific pre-trend. We measure off-platform response on a panel that joins opt-in clickstream to the same users' ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini conversations, and isolate the effect with a pre-trend event study, a stance classifier, non-customer conditioning, and a within-response same-category control: incidental name-drops then move behavior far less ($+1.8/+1.1/+0.3$), and the named brand moves far more than unnamed same-category brands in the same response. The downstream path is mostly search-mediated and reaches both own sites and retailer pages, with a destination mix that tracks baseline brand-directed behavior rather than redirecting toward either. The design is observational and we do not observe transactions, so retail is purchase-adjacent. Standard referrer-based and last-click measurement miss this upstream exposure: assistants move observably-unengaged users into open-web brand navigation along a path attributed elsewhere -- an acquisition touchpoint at the head of the customer journey that journey models and last-click attribution do not see.

cs.CY↗