Akmal Ashirmatov | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Test-Time Self-Play: Scaling without a Verifier

Test-time scaling methods spend additional compute at deployment to improve a large language model's performance on a hard target problem. Most methods rely on a verifier that scores candidate solutions for correctness, using it to select among or refine the model's outputs. In many deployment regimes, however, a strong verifier on the target problem is unavailable. We introduce Test-Time Self-Play (TTSP), an approach to test-time scaling using asymmetric self-play without reliance on a verifier. On a difficulty-calibrated subset of LiveCodeBench v6, TTSP is the best-performing method at every verifier strength we evaluate, and the gap to the strongest baseline widens as the verifier weakens; in the no-verifier limit, TTSP yields a 35\% absolute improvement in mean@8. The gains hold across a range of verifier strengths, except when the base policy has near-zero coverage of the correct answer.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

On Repulsive and Attractive Teachers: Separating Correctness from Behavior in Self-Distillation

On-policy self-distillation provides dense, token-level supervision by conditioning a model on privileged information and distilling the resulting teacher distribution back into the model. However, privileged information can change not only what the teacher knows, but also how it behaves, entangling correctness-relevant learning signals with unintended behavioral shifts. We study this effect in reasoning tasks by contrasting attractive self-distillation, which moves the model toward a privileged teacher, with repulsive self-distillation, which moves it away from a privileged teacher. We find that both objectives can induce strong and opposing behavioral shifts: attraction suppresses exploratory reasoning and promotes shorter, more confident responses, whereas repulsion increases response length, can trigger unintended switches into a model's latent thinking mode, and ultimately becomes unstable. Motivated by these observations, we study contrastive self-distillation, which combines attraction toward a correct-solution-conditioned teacher with repulsion from an incorrect-solution-conditioned teacher. In contrast to prior work that combines such distillation signals with a GRPO objective, we isolate the self-distillation objective and study its behavior on its own. We find that the shared behavioral shifts of the two teachers largely cancel, leaving a token-level signal that more directly reflects correctness. Across non-thinking, instruct-only, and already-thinking models, this contrastive objective improves reasoning performance while maintaining stable response lengths.

cs.LG↗