arXiv subjects

Aishwarya Fursule

Publications and source records attributed to Aishwarya Fursule.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

SPADE: A Multilingual Dataset for Speech Partial Deepfake Detection and Localization

Recent improvements in voice-cloning speech generation systems raise concerns about misuse by malicious actors to impersonate others and spread misinformation. Detecting such tampering is difficult, since deepfakes in the wild may be created by different generative models in a wide range of languages. Furthermore, the speech audio may also only be partially modified, presenting a different and potentially more challenging task than detecting fully-synthetic speech waveforms. To enable further research in this direction, we propose a multilingual dataset for detection and localization of partially edited speech samples. Our dataset includes speech in 12 languages, generated by up to five systems per language, and includes both a training set as well as an evaluation benchmark. To showcase the utility of our proposed dataset, we train localization models of existing architectures and study generalization across three axes: across different languages, across different speech synthesis and editing systems, and across different acoustic environments. Our results show that localization models almost always generalize poorly to speech edited by systems not seen during training. On the other hand, generalization to edited speech in unseen languages still degrades performance but to a lesser extent. We also augment our testing sets with noise to evaluate generalization across acoustic environments, and find that performance of localization models degrade significantly when tested on different acoustic conditions. All together, our results imply that existing deepfake speech detection methods are insufficient for reliably detecting edit-based speech deepfakes in various scenarios unseen during training. SPADE is publicly available on HuggingFace.

eess.AS↗

arXiv2026

Gender Fairness in Audio Deepfake Detection: Performance and Disparity Analysis

Audio deepfake detection aims to detect real human voices from those generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and has emerged as a significant problem in the field of voice biometrics systems. With the ever-improving quality of synthetic voice, the probability of such a voice being exploited for illicit practices like identity thest and impersonation increases. Although significant progress has been made in the field of Audio Deepfake Detection in recent times, the issue of gender bias remains underexplored and in its nascent stage In this paper, we have attempted a thorough analysis of gender dependent performance and fairness in audio deepfake detection models. We have used the ASVspoof 5 dataset and train a ResNet-18 classifier and evaluate detection performance across four different audio features, and compared the performance with baseline AASIST model. Beyond conventional metrics such as Equal Error Rate (EER %), we incorporated five established fairness metrics to quantify gender disparities in the model. Our results show that even when the overall EER difference between genders appears low, fairness-aware evaluation reveals disparities in error distribution that are obscured by aggregate performance measures. These findings demonstrate that reliance on standard metrics is unreliable, whereas fairness metrics provide critical insights into demographic-specific failure modes. This work highlights the importance of fairness-aware evaluation for developing a more equitable, robust, and trustworthy audio deepfake detection system.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

Towards Trustworthy Audio Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Framework for Diagnosing and Mitigating Gender Bias

Audio deepfake detection systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes security applications, yet their fairness across demographic groups remains critically underexamined. Prior work measures gender disparity but does not investigate where it comes from or how to fix it systematically. We present the first diagnosis-first framework that identifies bias source before applying targeted mitigation, evaluated on two models, AASIST and Wav2Vec2+ResNet18, on ASVSpoof5. Our diagnosis shows that bias does not stem from imbalanced training data but from acoustic representation differences, gender leakage in learned features, and structural evaluation asymmetry. We test mitigation strategies across in-processing, post-processing and combined families, including novel methods introduced in this work. Adjusting the decision threshold separately per gender reduces unfairness by 54% to 75% at no cost to detection accuracy, and our new epoch-level fairness regularisation method outperforms existing per-batch approaches. Adversarial debiasing succeeds only when gender leakage is localised, and fails when it is diffuse, an outcome correctly predicted by our diagnosis before training. No single method fully closes the fairness gap, confirming that bias sources must be identified before fixes are applied and that fairer benchmark design is equally important

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

PhonemeDF: A Synthetic Speech Dataset for Audio Deepfake Detection and Naturalness Evaluation

The growing sophistication of speech generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) has introduced new challenges in audio deepfake detection. Text-to-speech (TTS) and voice conversion (VC) technologies can create highly convincing synthetic speech with naturalness and intelligibility. This poses serious threats to voice biometric security and to systems designed to combat the spread of spoken misinformation, where synthetic voices may be used to disseminate false or malicious content. While interest in AI-generated speech has increased, resources for evaluating naturalness at the phoneme level remain limited. In this work, we address this gap by presenting the Phoneme-Level DeepFake dataset (PhonemeDF), comprising parallel real and synthetic speech segmented at the phoneme level. Real speech samples are derived from a subset of LibriSpeech, while synthetic samples are generated using four TTS and three VC systems. For each system, phoneme-aligned TextGrid files are obtained using the Montreal Forced Aligner (MFA). We compute the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) between real and synthetic phoneme distributions to quantify fidelity and establish a ranking based on similarity to natural speech. Our findings show a clear correlation between the KLD of real and synthetic phoneme distributions and the performance of classifiers trained to distinguish them, suggesting that KLD can serve as an indicator of the most discriminative phonemes for deepfake detection.

cs.SD↗