arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Aidan Looney

Publications and source records attributed to Aidan Looney.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Locational Marginal Pricing for Adaptive Robust Look-Ahead Dispatch with Casual Affine Recourse

This paper develops a marginal pricing mechanism for adaptive robust look-ahead economic dispatch (LAED) under net-load uncertainty. In current market practice, deterministic multi-interval dispatch can misprice flexibility when forecast error is large. Fully adaptive robust (FAR) dispatch captures this uncertainty, but competing worst-case trajectories can imply different marginal values of demand, leaving no single price for market settlement. We propose causal affine recourse (CAR) as a tractable, price-forming approximation. CAR replaces independently optimized trajectory-specific schedules with a causal affine response policy, yielding a market-clearing model that retains the standard energy and congestion decomposition of DC Locational Marginal Pricing. We then demonstrate that CAR-LMP together with a ramp-adjusted current settlement supports dispatch-following and eliminates current-period lost opportunity costs. We solve the CAR problem by deriving a robust counterpart and present computational evidence on exact small DC instances, a ten-generator system, and an IEEE 300-bus public-network case. These simulations show that the proposed prices collapse exactly to deterministic LAED-LMP when robustness is inactive, remain stable in loose-ramp regimes, and produce economically meaningful price shifts when flexibility is scarce. The proposed pricing mechanism provides a practical bridge between adaptive robust dispatch and market-based pricing.

eess.SY

Lost Opportunity Costs Under Ramp Stress: A Comparison of Ramp-Product Dispatch and Look-Ahead Economic Dispatch

This paper studies whether ramp-product settlement compensates generators that absorb intertemporal ramp scarcity as effectively as look-ahead economic dispatch. We evaluate this question by comparing the lost opportunity cost (LOC) induced by each approach. Using rolling-horizon simulations on a 10-generator system and a modified RTS-GMLC system, we compare ramp-product settlement (RP-LMP), look-ahead settlement (LA-LMP), and temporal locational marginal pricing (TLMP). In the featured deterministic ramp stressed cases, aggregate LOC is higher under RP-LMP than under LA-LMP. The main contribution is a generator-level critical assessment for ramp-product settlement: we identify which units are left with uncompensated intertemporal opportunity cost under RP-LMP and how that burden changes under LA-LMP. RP-LMP LOC is concentrated on units with repeated ramp-binding exposure, while LA-LMP mainly relieves those same units and leaves smaller residual LOC on other units. Multi-day tests preserve this ordering under perfect foresight in the larger test system, but show that it need not hold under forecast error.

eess.SY