Aho Yapi | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Cross-sector generalization of accident-process role classification in occupational accident narratives

Occupational accident narratives contain valuable information about work situations, unfavourable conditions, accident events, and their consequences. Automatically structuring these narratives can facilitate large-scale accident analysis and support occupational risk prevention. However, the terminology and writing styles used to describe accidents vary considerably across sectors and organisations, raising questions about the ability of automated coding systems to generalize beyond their training domain. In this paper, we evaluate the cross-sector generalization of accident-process role classification in French occupational accident narratives. We construct an expert-annotated corpus in which factual units are classified into four roles: work situation (A0), explicitly reported unfavourable condition (A1), accident event or deviation (B), and reported consequence (C). The role classifiers are developed and selected exclusively on 42,244 factual units extracted from 6,040 construction-sector narratives and are then evaluated on unseen corpora from the metallurgy and chemistry--plastics sectors, as well as on an independently collected company corpus, without retraining or target-domain tuning of the role classifier. We compare frozen pretrained representations with task-specific fine-tuning and supervised representation-learning strategies. The results show that task-specific adaptation consistently improves cross-domain transfer over frozen representations. Across repeated training runs, the three leading task-adapted strategies achieved average balanced accuracies between 85.6% and 85.8% across the three target corpora. These findings support the development of transferable assisted-coding systems capable of consistently structuring heterogeneous occupational accident narratives for expert review and cross-sector prevention analysis.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

A new machine learning framework for occupational accidents forecasting with safety inspections integration

We propose a model-agnostic framework for short-term occupational accident forecasting that leverages safety inspections and models accident occurrences as binary time series. The approach generates daily predictions, which are then aggregated into weekly safety assessments for better decision making. To ensure the reliability and operational applicability of the forecasts, we apply a sliding-window cross-validation procedure specifically designed for time series data, combined with an evaluation based on aggregated period-level metrics. Several machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, tree-based models, and neural networks, are trained and systematically compared within this framework. Across all tested algorithms, the proposed framework reliably identifies upcoming high-risk periods and delivers robust period-level performance, demonstrating that converting safety inspections into binary time series yields actionable, short-term risk signals. The proposed methodology converts routine safety inspection data into clear weekly and daily risk scores, detecting the periods when accidents are most likely to occur. Decision-makers can integrate these scores into their planning tools to classify inspection priorities, schedule targeted interventions, and funnel resources to the sites or shifts classified as highest risk, stepping in before incidents occur and getting the greatest return on safety investments.

cs.LG↗