How Much Training is Needed with a Digital Twin?
The following paper addresses how much pilot training is needed when a digital twin (DT) of the wireless radio channel is available to aid a wireless communication system with a channel estimation task. The DT of a wireless channel is widely expected to reduce the pilot overhead of channel estimation, following the informal rule that \emph{``the more accurate the twin, the fewer pilots are needed.''} This trade-off, however, has only ever been demonstrated empirically and never quantified. We close this gap by treating the DT as a complementary measurement of the channel that the receiver fuses with its pilot observations in the physical world. Consequently, fusing the physical and digital worlds through the best linear unbiased estimator, we derive a DT-aided Cram\'er-Rao bound, and from it a \emph{pilot-equivalence law} that converts DT fidelity into an equivalent number of training symbols. For a biased twin unknown to the estimator, we obtain the exact mismatch threshold beyond which trusting the DT is worse than ignoring it. We quantify how much training is needed with the DT to attain a desired mean square error on channel estimation. Particular cases are discussed to tell when training in the physical world can be completely bypassed. We finally translate these results into a block-fading achievable rate whose optimal training length is the unique root of a single equation, and identify the DT fidelity above which pilot training can be dispensed with altogether. Extensive numerical results corroborate closed-form expression and reveal that the value of a DT is largest at finite signal-to-noise ratio and vanishes in both the low- and high-SNR limits.