arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Adam Thomas.
We show that the categories of compact Lie groups and complex reductive groups (not necessarily connected) are homotopy equivalent topological categories. In other words, the corresponding categories enriched in the homotopy category of topological spaces are equivalent. This can also be interpreted as an equivalence of infinity categories.
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are being increasingly used to make predictions from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. However, they are widely seen as uninterpretable "black boxes", as it can be difficult to discover what input information is used by the DNN in the process, something important in both cognitive neuroscience and clinical applications. A saliency map is a common approach for producing interpretable visualizations of the relative importance of input features for a prediction. However, methods for creating maps often fail due to DNNs being sensitive to input noise, or by focusing too much on the input and too little on the model. It is also challenging to evaluate how well saliency maps correspond to the truly relevant input information, as ground truth is not always available. In this paper, we review a variety of methods for producing gradient-based saliency maps, and present a new adversarial training method we developed to make DNNs robust to input noise, with the goal of improving interpretability. We introduce two quantitative evaluation procedures for saliency map methods in fMRI, applicable whenever a DNN or linear model is being trained to decode some information from imaging data. We evaluate the procedures using a synthetic dataset where the complex activation structure is known, and on saliency maps produced for DNN and linear models for task decoding in the Human Connectome Project (HCP) dataset. Our key finding is that saliency maps produced with different methods vary widely in interpretability, in both in synthetic and HCP fMRI data. Strikingly, even when DNN and linear models decode at comparable levels of performance, DNN saliency maps score higher on interpretability than linear model saliency maps (derived via weights or gradient). Finally, saliency maps produced with our adversarial training method outperform those from other methods.
How an individual's unique brain connectivity determines that individual's cognition, behavior, and risk for pathology is a fundamental question in basic and clinical neuroscience. In seeking answers, many have turned to machine learning, with some noting the particular promise of deep neural networks in modelling complex non-linear functions. However, it is not clear that complex functions actually exist between brain connectivity and behavior, and thus if deep neural networks necessarily outperform simpler linear models, or if their results would be interpretable. Here we show that, across 52 subject measures of cognition and behavior, deep neural networks fit to each brain region's connectivity outperform linear regression, particularly for the brain's connector hubs--regions with diverse brain connectivity--whereas the two approaches perform similarly when fit to brain systems. Critically, averaging deep neural network predictions across brain regions results in the most accurate predictions, demonstrating the ability of deep neural networks to easily model the various functions that exists between regional brain connectivity and behavior, carving the brain at its joints. Finally, we shine light into the black box of deep neural networks using multislice network models. We determined that the relationship between connector hubs and behavior is best captured by modular deep neural networks. Our results demonstrate that both simple and complex relationships exist between brain connectivity and behavior, and that deep neural networks can fit both. Moreover, deep neural networks are particularly powerful when they are first fit to the various functions of a system independently and then combined. Finally, deep neural networks are interpretable when their architectures are structurally characterized using multislice network models.
A closed subgroup of a semisimple algebraic group is called irreducible if it lies in no proper parabolic subgroup. In this paper we classify all irreducible $A_1$ subgroups of exceptional algebraic groups $G$. Consequences are given concerning the representations of such subgroups on various $G$-modules: for example, the conjugacy classes of irreducible $A_1$ subgroups are determined by their composition factors on the adjoint module of $G$.
A closed subgroup of a semisimple algebraic group is called irreducible if it lies in no proper parabolic subgroup. In this paper we classify all irreducible subgroups of exceptional algebraic groups $G$ which are connected, closed and simple of rank at least $2$. Consequences are given concerning the representations of such subgroups on various $G$-modules: for example, with one exception, the conjugacy classes of irreducible simple connected subgroups of rank at least $2$ are determined by their composition factors on the adjoint module for $G$.