arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Abhishek Rawat

Publications and source records attributed to Abhishek Rawat.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Root-sparsity scaling for Hamiltonian simulation, differential equations and linear-system solvers

We give quantum algorithms for Hamiltonian simulation, linear differential equations, and linear systems with square-root dependence on sparsity. For an $s$-sparse Hermitian matrix with row and column Euclidean norms bounded by $η$, evolution for time $t$ to error $ε$ uses $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{s}τ+\sqrt{sτ\log(1/ε)}+\log(1/ε))$ queries, where $τ=η|t|$. The same bound holds for time-dependent Hamiltonians with coherent time-indexed sparse access and certified time discretisation. Our construction combines an exact entrywise representation with Cayley transducers. A joint lower bound nearly matches the time, sparsity, and precision dependence, ruling out a uniformly additive bound in $\sqrt{s}τ$ and $\log(1/ε)$. For dissipative linear differential equations we obtain $\mathcal{O}(\bar g[\sqrt{s}(τ+\sqrtτ)+1]\log(C\bar g/ε))$ queries, where $τ$ is the evolution time multiplied by a norm bound, $\bar g$ bounds the ratio of combined input and source norms to the final-solution norm, and $C$ is an absolute constant. We sharpen this bound by separating Hamiltonian and dissipative components, and treat general constant generators. Lower bounds capture joint parameter dependence for time-dependent equations and precision hardness for constant positive semidefinite dissipation. For linear systems, a Cayley walk and Chebyshev filter give $\mathcal{O}(κ\sqrt{s}\log(1/ε))$ queries when $\|A\|\le1$ and $\|A^{-1}\|\leκ$, and we give an alternative proof of a matching joint lower bound. We also give gate-efficient implementations of time-independent Hamiltonian simulation and the dissipative ODE solver, including Lipschitz time dependence, retaining the query bounds with polylogarithmic overhead in inverse precision given efficient entry decoding, arithmetic, and required source preparations.

quant-ph↗

Rest-frame UV versus optical morphologies of galaxies using Sersic profile fitting: the importance of morphological K-correction

We show a comparison of the rest-frame UV morphologies of a sample of 162 intermediate redshift (median redshift 1.02) galaxies with their rest-frame optical morphologies. We select our sample from the deepest near-UV image obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) using the WFPC2 (F300W) as part of the parallel observations of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field campaign overlapping with the HST/ACS GOODS dataset. We perform single component Sersic fits in both WFPC2/F300W (rest-frame UV) and ACS/F850LP (rest-frame optical) bands and deduce that the Sersic index $n$ is estimated to be smaller in the rest-frame UV compared to the rest-frame optical, leading to an overestimation of the number of merger candidates by ~40-100% compared to the rest-frame optical depending upon the cutoff in $n$ employed for identifying merger candidates. This effect seems to be dominated by galaxies with low values of n(F300W) <= 0.5 that have a value of n(F850LP) ~ 1.0. We argue that these objects are probably clumpy starforming galaxies or minor mergers, both of which are essentially contaminants, if one is interested in identifying major mergers. In addition we also find evidence that the axis ratio b/a is lower, i.e. ellipticity (1-b/a) is higher in rest-frame UV compared to the rest-frame optical. Moreover, we find that in the rest-frame UV, the number of high ellipticity (e >= 0.8) objects are higher by a factor of ~2.8 compared to the rest-frame optical. This indicates that the reported dominance of elongated morphologies among high-z LBGs might just be a bias related to the use of rest-frame UV datasets in high-z studies.

astro-ph.GA↗