arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Abhinav Sharma

Publications and source records attributed to Abhinav Sharma.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Pre-Lane-change Signal in Transitional Autonomous Vehicles: Results from Controlled Experiments

This paper investigates how a production transitional autonomous vehicle (tAV) develops and executes mandatory lane-change decisions. Using 150 controlled mandatory lane changes from the NC-tALC experiments, the study examines whether the eventual target gap is observable before lateral movement begins and how the tAV progresses longitudinally from that pre-lane-change state to lane-change start. Signal time (SigT) is defined as an operational pre-lane-change-start reference point. A Firth logistic regression predicts whether the tAV eventually merges in front of or behind its nearest target-lane vehicle using relative position and relative speed at SigT. Longitudinal progression from SigT to lane-change start is then examined separately for in-position and repositioning cases. The traffic state at SigT contains substantial information about eventual target-gap choice and provides meaningful lead time before lateral movement begins. The proposed formulation predicts whether the tAV remains with its current gap or repositions to a neighboring gap by moving forward or dropping back, including cases with longitudinal overlap and ambiguous current-gap geometry. The model achieves an average five-fold cross-validated accuracy of 0.89. Results also provide preliminary evidence that in-position and repositioning cases follow different longitudinal pathways from SigT to lane-change start. These findings support a two-stage conjecture of the observable lane-change process: longitudinal preparation from SigT to lane-change start, followed by lateral maneuver execution. The formulation applies to in-position, repositioning, and longitudinally overlapping cases, and can support lane-change models that distinguish target-gap choice from lateral-onset timing while representing longitudinal preparation before lateral movement begins.

cs.RO

Expert-validated STEM QA

Recent advancements in AI are helping scientists achieve breakthroughs in fields such as mathematics, medicine, and materials sciences. New evaluation datasets for AI models contribute to such advancement in AI. In the STEM domain, frontier models have consumed most of the available online data, creating the need for human-created datasets that codify the knowledge of leading experts in the domain. There are several STEM datasets available for the research community in this field. However, there are some gaps in these datasets, leaving room for improvement. Examples of gaps include (1) saturation in model performance on these datasets, leaving no head-room for meaningful evaluations, (2) skewed taxonomy distributions, (3) multiple choice question format that is misaligned with how scientists use AI in the real world, and (4) inaccurate answers and rationales partially led by a contest-based data collection and a time-bound review process. In this study, we present 'Expert-validated STEM QA', a high-quality, expert-validated STEM dataset (N=398) in Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Mathematics, created by 241 domain experts. We (1) carefully designed a taxonomy with balanced distribution, (2) vetted question contributors with quality-driven incentive, (3) conducted multiple rounds of reviews with revisions validated by domain experts based on consensus, and (4) created the dataset in verifiable question and answer format. Our study demonstrated low performance ($<25\%$) of frontier AI models on the dataset as a benchmark. Post-training on a separate, private version of the dataset (N=2,000) increased performance of the open source model by $15\%$ relative to the baseline model (p=0.045) on the STEM subset of HLE-verified dataset, indicating potential utility of the dataset for model training. We have open-sourced a portion of our dataset for the AI research community.

cs.AI