arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Aarav Jain

Publications and source records attributed to Aarav Jain.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

HEROIC: Heterogeneous Evidential Reasoning for Open-Vocabulary Identification and Cross-Robot Collaboration

Multi-agent heterogeneous air-ground robot teams are attractive for open world search, with applications for reconnaissance, urban search and rescue missions (USAR), disaster response and recovery, and hazardous environments. These two platforms have different failure modes: aerial robots cover ground quickly but cannot resolve small or occluded targets from altitude, while ground robots can identify objects-of-interest, such as people or hazardous objects, at close range but cover less area. Existing language-tasked teams either have roles fixed prior, or have a language model assign them from hand-written capability tags, so the team is unable to know when within a mission an asset is no longer useful. We present HEROIC, a decentralized heterogeneous multi-agent open-vocabulary search coordination framework that requires agents to communicate in natural language only. HEROIC's initial agent role assignment is derived from sensor properties and a scale law to determine whether targets can be detected with a high confidence. From the mission's natural language prompt alone, this law assigns aerial flight altitudes and sweep spacing. When this calculated height falls below the altitude for safe flight, aerial agents re-task themselves from searcher to aerial triage, escort, and route guide for ground agents. Both robots maintain an evidential belief over the search area (bearing rays for positive evidence, a log-odds posterior for negative evidence) and gate any arrival on close-range verification. In full-stack experiments, HEROIC reaches the target 84% of the time across all 6 scenes, compares to 35-54% for vision-language frontier baselines, frontier-based search, lawnmower, and random-walk running the same perception, all while being 2-4x sooner to arrive at the target.

cs.RO

LLM assisted web application functional requirements generation: A case study of four popular LLMs over a Mess Management System

Like any other discipline, Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly impacted software engineering by helping developers generate the required artifacts across various phases of software development. This paper presents a case study comparing the performance of popular LLMs GPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek in generating functional specifications that include use cases, business rules, and collaborative workflows for a web application, the Mess Management System. The study evaluated the quality of LLM generated use cases, business rules, and collaborative workflows in terms of their syntactic and semantic correctness, consistency, non ambiguity, and completeness compared to the reference specifications against the zero-shot prompted problem statement. Our results suggested that all four LLMs can specify syntactically and semantically correct, mostly non-ambiguous artifacts. Still, they may be inconsistent at times and may differ significantly in the completeness of the generated specification. Claude and Gemini generated all the reference use cases, with Claude achieving the most complete but somewhat redundant use case specifications. Similar results were obtained for specifying workflows. However, all four LLMs struggled to generate relevant Business Rules, with DeepSeek generating the most reference rules but with less completeness. Overall, Claude generated more complete specification artifacts, while Gemini was more precise in the specifications it generated.

cs.SE

TRUTH DECAY: Quantifying Multi-Turn Sycophancy in Language Models

Rapid improvements in large language models have unveiled a critical challenge in human-AI interaction: sycophancy. In this context, sycophancy refers to the tendency of models to excessively agree with or flatter users, often at the expense of factual accuracy. While previous studies have primarily analyzed this behavior in single-turn interactions, its persistence and evolution in multi-step conversations remain largely unexplored. We introduce TRUTH DECAY, a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate sycophancy in extended dialogues, where language models must navigate iterative user feedback, challenges, and persuasion. We prompt models to elicit four types of sycophantic biases. We then propose and test sycophancy reduction strategies, evaluating their effectiveness beyond single-step interactions.

cs.CL