arXiv subjects

Aakanksha Sharma

Publications and source records attributed to Aakanksha Sharma.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The 5P Reflection Model for Education in the Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Era

Contributions: A reflection model suitable for the era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is introduced. The proposed model is an integrated model that extracts features from various existing models and also incorporates technological aspects of GenAI. Background: Universities worldwide are facing challenges in adopting GenAI into their curricula, as it has impacted academic integrity and the scholarship of teaching and research. Traditional reflection models are struggling to authenticate student reflection as GenAI is incorporated in education. This requires a GenAI-aware model to enable the opportunities that address the associated challenges with GenAI. Research Questions: Does the academic ecosystem require a GenAI-aware reflection model to adopt GenAI into education? How to make a reflection model structured to ensure student authenticity and cognitive engagement within a GenAI-aware learning environment? Methodology: This study employs a design-based research methodology, assisted by a critical inquiry approach, to analyse existing reflection models in the era of GenAI and examine the technological aspects of GenAI. Additionally, it identifies a gap and the absence of a comprehensive reflection model that enhances reflection in the era of GenAI and supports the effective integration of GenAI in education. Findings: The literature survey indicates there is a greater need for reflection in the era of GenAI to ensure learning, but the existing reflection models lack proper strategies to manage the problem introduced by GenAI. A standard GenAI-aware reflection model, called 5P (Purpose, Process, Product, Pitfalls and Plan), is proposed i) to manage greater demand for reflection, ii) to address the limitations of the existing reflection models, iii) to consider technological aspects of GenAI.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

L-PRISMA: An Extension of PRISMA in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework provides a rigorous foundation for evidence synthesis, yet the manual processes of data extraction and literature screening remain time-consuming and restrictive. Recent advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), particularly large language models (LLMs), offer opportunities to automate and scale these tasks, thereby improving time and efficiency. However, reproducibility, transparency, and auditability, the core PRISMA principles, are being challenged by the inherent non-determinism of LLMs and the risks of hallucination and bias amplification. To address these limitations, this study integrates human-led synthesis with a GenAI-assisted statistical pre-screening step. Human oversight ensures scientific validity and transparency, while the deterministic nature of the statistical layer enhances reproducibility. The proposed approach systematically enhances PRISMA guidelines, providing a responsible pathway for incorporating GenAI into systematic review workflows.

cs.DL↗

arXiv2025

Experiences with Content Development and Assessment Design in the Era of GenAI

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has the potential to transform higher education by generating human-like content. The advancement in GenAI has revolutionised several aspects of education, especially subject and assessment design. In this era, it is crucial to design assessments that challenge students and cannot be solved using GenAI tools. This makes it necessary to update the educational content with rapidly evolving technology. The assessment plays a significant role in ensuring the students learning, as it encourages students to engage actively, leading to the achievement of learning outcomes. The paper intends to determine how effectively GenAI can design a subject, including lectures, labs and assessments, using prompts and custom-based training. This paper aims to elucidate the direction to educators so they can leverage GenAI to create subject content. Additionally, we provided our experiential learning for educators to develop content, highlighting the importance of prompts and fine-tuning to ensure output quality. It has also been observed that expert evaluation is essential for assessing the quality of GenAI-generated materials throughout the content generation process.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2024

Framework for Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Education

Contributions: An adoption framework to include GenAI in the university curriculum. It identifies and highlights the role of different stakeholders (university management, students, staff, etc.) during the adoption process. It also proposes an objective approach based upon an evaluation matrix to assess the success and outcome of the GenAI adoption. Background: Universities worldwide are debating and struggling with the adoption of GenAI in their curriculum. Both the faculty and students are unsure about the approach in the absence of clear guidelines through the administration and regulators. This requires an established framework to define a process and articulate the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder involved. Research Questions: Whether the academic ecosystem requires a methodology to adopt GenAI into its curriculum? A systematic approach for the academic staff to ensure the students' learning outcomes are met with the adoption of GenAI. How to measure and communicate the adoption of GenAI in the university setup? Methodology: The methodology employed in this study focuses on examining the university education system and assessing the opportunities and challenges related to incorporating GenAI in teaching and learning. Additionally, it identifies a gap and the absence of a comprehensive framework that obstructs the effective integration of GenAI within the academic environment. Findings: The literature survey results indicate the limited or no adoption of GenAI by the university, which further reflects the dilemma in the minds of different stakeholders. For the successful adoption of GenAI, a standard framework is proposed i) for effective redesign of the course curriculum, ii) for enabling staff and students, iii) to define an evaluation matrix to measure the effectiveness and success of the adoption process.

cs.CY↗