arXiv · quant-ph/9807037
The Three-Box "Paradox" and Other Reasons to Reject the Counterfactual Usage of the ABL Rule
Abstract
An apparent paradox proposed by Aharonov and Vaidman in which a single particle can be found with certainty in two (or more) boxes is analyzed by way of a simple thought experiment. It is found that the apparent paradox arises from an invalid counterfactual usage of the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule, and effectively attributes conflicting properties not to the same particle but to different particles. A connection is made between the present analysis and the consistent histories formulation of Griffiths. Finally, a critique is given of some recent counterarguments by Vaidman against the rejection of the counterfactual usage of the ABL rule.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
R. E. Kastner. 1998-07-14. The Three-Box "Paradox" and Other Reasons to Reject the Counterfactual Usage of the ABL Rule. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9807037
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.