arXiv · quant-ph/9711044
Timing, ``Accidentals'' and Other Artifacts in EPR Experiments
Abstract
Subtraction of ``accidentals'' in Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiments frequently changes results compatible with local realism into ones that appear to demonstrate non-locality. The validity of the procedure depends on the unproven assumption of the independence of emission events. Other possible sources of bias include enhancement, imperfect synchronisation, over-reliance on rotational invariance, and the well-known detection loophole. Investigation of existing results may be more fruitful than attempts at loophole-free Bell tests, improving our understanding of light.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Caroline H. Thompson. 1997-11-25. Timing, ``Accidentals'' and Other Artifacts in EPR Experiments. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9711044
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.