arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · q-bio/0612036

How behavioral constraints may determine optimal sensory representations

Emilio Salinas
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The sensory-triggered activity of a neuron is typically characterized in terms of a tuning curve, which describes the neuron's average response as a function of a parameter that characterizes a physical stimulus. What determines the shapes of tuning curves in a neuronal population? Previous theoretical studies and related experiments suggest that many response characteristics of sensory neurons are optimal for encoding stimulus-related information. This notion, however, does not explain the two general types of tuning profiles that are commonly observed: unimodal and monotonic. Here, I quantify the efficacy of a set of tuning curves according to the possible downstream motor responses that can be constructed from them. Curves that are optimal in this sense may have monotonic or non-monotonic profiles, where the proportion of monotonic curves and the optimal tuning curve width depend on the general properties of the target downstream functions. This dependence explains intriguing features of visual cells that are sensitive to binocular disparity and of neurons tuned to echo delay in bats. The numerical results suggest that optimal sensory tuning curves are shaped not only by stimulus statistics and signal-to-noise properties, but also according to their impact on downstream neural circuits and, ultimately, on behavior.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.NC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Emilio Salinas. 2006-12-18. How behavioral constraints may determine optimal sensory representations. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040387

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Identifying Neural State Changes due to Gain versus Off-Manifold Displacement

Memory segmentation is thought to arise from rapid decorrelation in neural activity, often quantified by Euclidean distance or cosine angle. Although these metrics detect a transition, they do not reveal how the new state relates to the repertoire represented by the neural manifold. This matters because neuromodulators that drive state transitions also alter excitability, and learning may repurpose existing representations or create new ones. Here, I introduce a geometric decomposition that separates changes attributable to gain modulation of a nearby manifold state from movement within the manifold and genuine off-manifold displacement. The approach uses the radial axis of neural population activity to partition the normal space of a local manifold region. A central challenge is identifiability: given only a static reference manifold and a single test state, neither the state from which a perturbation began nor its gain magnitude and mechanistic decomposition can generally be recovered uniquely. I therefore formulate identifiability as a cascade of geometric gates specifying when each component can be interpreted. The gates distinguish structural failures, including the absence of a local chart or incorrect intrinsic dimensionality, from estimation error and systematic bias caused by reference sampling, tangent-frame error, gain-axis misalignment, anchor displacement, and poor ratio conditioning. Simulations show that neighborhood size, curvature, sampling density, ambient dimension, and noise act through a small set of geometric quantities. The framework specifies when assignments to gain or novelty are identifiable, how they become biased, and which diagnostics reveal the relevant failure regime. By quantifying the nature rather than only the magnitude of neural state change, it provides a clear, readily interpretable framework for evaluating mechanisms of neural state transitions.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2026

Neural Langevin Machine: a local asymmetric learning rule can be creative

Fixed points of recurrent neural networks can be leveraged to store and generate information. These fixed points are captured by the Boltzmann-Gibbs measure, which leads to neural Langevin dynamics that relax to those fixed points for generative learning of a real dataset. We call this type of generative model a neural Langevin machine, which derives an asymmetric and firing-rate-speed-adjusted learning rule requiring only local neural signals, thereby bearing biological relevance in terms of local predictive learning. An out-of-equilibrium regime of the generative process is revealed, together with a memorization-to-generalization transition with increasing training data size. The neuro-inspired machine can also realize a continuous exploration of the phase space for different kinds of generative images and can denoise a corrupted image as well.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2026

A Mathematical Model of Motivated Emotional Mind - Cognitive Embodied System

This article presents a mathematical model of the Motivated Emotional Mind cognitive architecture developed for embodied intelligent systems. Such a system learns to maintain its homeostasis through a generalized form of reinforcement learning based on its internal motivations, termed motivated learning (ML). The principal contribution of this article is a rigorous formalization of the re-entrant loop integrating feedforward processing, lateral interactions, and feedback pathways, together with the representational selection mechanisms that govern adaptive system responses. The model specifies how ongoing exteroceptive and interoceptive signals, bodily-motivational context, and memory traces are bound into associative memory structures termed semblions, which compete for access to further processing and top-down reconstruction. The formalization encompasses secondary perception, representational competition, curiosity, procedural gaps, and action selection directed toward limiting allostatic violations. Within this framework, motivated learning is tailored to embodied systems whose dynamics are shaped by needs, affect, and the current regulatory state. Unlike standard reinforcement-learning models, the proposed approach incorporates need thresholds, goal generation and shifting goals, bodily state, resource constraints, and action uncertainty, thereby providing a more adequate account of response selection under regulatory pressure. Global affect functions as a central control signal, modulating the learning rate, representational valence, and the balance between exploration and exploitation. The model presented here is a step toward a more rigorous formalization of cognitive phenomena and may provide a basis for further theoretical analysis, computer simulation, and implementation in artificial-intelligence systems inspired by biological processes.

q-bio.NC↗