arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · q-bio/0609035

Size, shape, and flexibility of RNA structures

Abstract

Determination of sizes and flexibilities of RNA molecules is important in understanding the nature of packing in folded structures and in elucidating interactions between RNA and DNA or proteins. Using the coordinates of the structures of RNA in the Protein Data Bank we find that the size of the folded RNA structures, measured using the radius of gyration, $R_G$, follows the Flory scaling law, namely, $R_G =5.5 N^{1/3}$ Åwhere N is the number of nucleotides. The shape of RNA molecules is characterized by the asphericity $Δ$ and the shape $S$ parameters that are computed using the eigenvalues of the moment of inertia tensor. From the distribution of $Δ$, we find that a large fraction of folded RNA structures are aspherical and the distribution of $S$ values shows that RNA molecules are prolate ($S>0$). The flexibility of folded structures is characterized by the persistence length $l_p$. By fitting the distance distribution function $P(r)$ to the worm-like chain model we extracted the persistence length $l_p$. We find that $l_p\approx 1.5 N^{0.33}$ Å. The dependence of $l_p$ on $N$ implies the average length of helices should increases as the size of RNA grows. We also analyze packing in the structures of ribosomes (30S, 50S, and 70S) in terms of $R_G$, $Δ$, $S$, and $l_p$. The 70S and the 50S subunits are more spherical compared to most RNA molecules. The globularity in 50S is due to the presence of an unusually large number (compared to 30S subunit) of small helices that are stitched together by bulges and loops. Comparison of the shapes of the intact 70S ribosome and the constituent particles suggests that folding of the individual molecules might occur prior to assembly.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Changbong Hyeon, Ruxandra I. Dima, D. Thirumalai. 2006-09-23. Size, shape, and flexibility of RNA structures. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2364190

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

SaltyMeta: a curated benchmark and protein language model-informed web tool for salty peptide prediction

Excess sodium intake remains a major public health challenge, while salty and saltiness-enhancing peptides offer a potential route to preserve sensory saltiness in reduced-sodium foods. Machine-learning studies of salty peptides, however, are constrained by small datasets, heterogeneous evidence standards, uncertain negative labels, and sequence similarity leakage. Here we present SaltyMeta, a curated benchmark and web-accessible screening framework for salty or saltiness-enhancing short peptides. The benchmark contains 580 peptides, including 280 positive peptides and 300 negative peptides, all standardized to 2-15 residue one-letter amino-acid sequences. Quality control found no non-standard residues, exact duplicates, or positive-negative overlaps. A similarity-grouped split retained 456 peptides for training and 124 for held-out testing. We evaluated 548 interpretable peptide descriptors, frozen ESM2 embeddings at 8M, 35M, and 150M parameter scales, and descriptor-embedding fusion models under grouped cross-validation. The traditional ExtraTrees baseline selected by training-set grouped cross-validation achieved ROC-AUC=0.693 in cross-validation and ROC-AUC=0.704, PR-AUC=0.702, F1=0.626, and MCC=0.304 on the held-out test set. The best initial protein-language-model fusion was traditional descriptors plus ESM2-8M embeddings, with grouped CV ROC-AUC=0.696 and test ROC-AUC=0.700. Advanced optimization using PCA95 dimensionality reduction and ExtraTrees feature-importance filtering yielded a practical ESM2-8M PCA95 top-300 model with test ROC-AUC=0.715 and PR-AUC=0.703, although repeated-CV gains remained modest. SaltyMeta is a transparent prioritization tool, not a sensory validation substitute. We provide benchmark, models, scripts, GitHub, and Streamlit for reproducible screening of food-derived peptides.

q-bio.BM

Synthesizing State-of-the-Art Structure Predictions from Soup of Co-folding Models

Co-folding models have advanced rapidly, yet no single model consistently performs best across all biomolecular complexes. This raises the question of whether independently trained co-folding models encode complementary information that can be transferred across co-folding models. We introduce SoupFold, which improves co-folding predictions by learning simple mappings between the representation spaces of co-folding models. At inference time, SoupFold transfers and incorporates representations from other co-folding models to update the representation used for structure prediction. Importantly, this does not re-train the co-folding models. We evaluate SoupFold on protein-protein and protein-ligand prediction tasks of FoldBench using AlphaFold3, Protenix, ESMFold2, and OpenDDE. By combining their representations, SoupFold achieves state-of-the-art performance on both protein-protein and protein-ligand structure prediction, showing that independently trained co-folding models encode complementary information that can be effectively transferred across models.

q-bio.BM

Exploring Optimal Parameters for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening in Early Drug Discovery

Ligand-based virtual screening depends on choices that are often treated as implementation details, including the similarity threshold, fingerprint setting and atom-invariant scheme. We examined how these choices altered the composition of ranked searches against the Enamine library for four aminergic reference ligands: atomoxetine, bupropion, mirtazapine and venlafaxine. Candidate sets were evaluated by compound-weighted scaffold novelty, normalized Shannon scaffold diversity and three computational estimates of synthetic accessibility. We first identified ligand-specific operating points along cumulative Tanimoto-ranked searches. We then compared five extended-connectivity fingerprint settings at matched retrieval depths and compared ECFP4 with the feature-class analogue FCSFP4. Finally, 240 records, corresponding to 229 unique structures, were scored independently by three chemists who were blinded to the computational scores. No single Tanimoto cutoff described all four searches. ECFP8 provided the most stable pooled setting, although venlafaxine favored ECFP2. ECFP4 was the stronger primary fingerprint in pooled comparisons, whereas FCSFP4 contributed nonredundant chemical space. Agreement among individual chemists was moderate, and the mean rating was more reliable than a single rating. SCScore showed the highest association with the blinded consensus, but performance varied by ligand. These results support a staged screening design in which a pooled default is followed by ligand-specific calibration and expert review.

q-bio.BM