Theory of Hantavirus Infection Spread Incorporating Localized Adult and Itinerant Juvenile Mice

V. M. Kenkre; L. Giuggioli; G. Abramson; G. Camelo-Neto

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · q-bio/0511024

Theory of Hantavirus Infection Spread Incorporating Localized Adult and Itinerant Juvenile Mice

V. M. Kenkre·L. Giuggioli·G. Abramson·G. Camelo-Neto

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A generalized model of the spread of the Hantavirus in mice populations is presented on the basis of recent observational findings concerning the movement characteristics of the mice that carry the infection. The factual information behind the generalization is based on mark-recapture observations reported in Giuggioli et al. [Bull. Math. Biol. 67, 1135 (2005)] that have necessitated the introduction of home ranges in the simple model of Hantavirus spread presented by Abramson and Kenkre [Phys. Rev. E 66, 11912 (2002)]. The essential feature of the model presented here is the existence of adult mice that remain largely confined to locations near their home ranges, and itinerant juvenile mice that are not so confined, and, during their search for their own homes, move and infect both other juveniles and adults that they meet during their movement. The model is presented at three levels of description: mean field, kinetic and configuration. Results of calculations are shown explicitly from the mean field equations and the simulation rules, and are found to agree in some respects and to differ in others. The origin of the differences is shown to lie in spatial correlations. It is indicated how mark-recapture observations in the field may be employed to verify the applicability of the theory.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.PE cond-mat.stat-mech

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

V. M. Kenkre, L. Giuggioli, G. Abramson, G. Camelo-Neto. 2005-11-15. Theory of Hantavirus Infection Spread Incorporating Localized Adult and Itinerant Juvenile Mice. https://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio/0511024

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Evolution as fitness landscape navigation: concepts, measures, and emerging questions

Fitness landscapes are mappings between genotypes, phenotypes, and fitness that shape evolution. In recent years, empirical work and theoretical models have greatly advanced our understanding of how populations navigate rugged fitness landscapes. Here, we provide a timely review of the theoretical aspects of this field. Its rapidly growing literature employs a wide range of terms, which are sometimes used ambiguously or inconsistently. We therefore begin by defining the major concepts and the field's vocabulary, highlighting our own terminology choices wherever needed. We then review key results on the relationships between epistasis, ruggedness, accessibility, and navigability for genotype-fitness maps, highlighting several complex and sometimes counterintuitive connections that have emerged. Further, we review how the conserved structural properties of the underlying genotype-phenotype map, which can lead to the formation of large connected neutral networks of genotypes, influence dynamics on fitness landscapes. We then compare the two levels to study landscape navigation: the level of genotype-phenotype maps and the level of genotype-fitness maps. Our review leads us to propose a new measure of navigability, based on evolutionary outcomes, that is broadly applicable and overcomes limitations of existing measures. Finally, we highlight examples from the smaller body of work that relaxes the common assumption of fitness-monotonic paths on static landscapes, and discuss how this can fundamentally change the nature of fitness landscape navigation. Throughout the review, we identify directions for future work to fill existing gaps and to synthesize the disparate strands of research within the field.

q-bio.PE↗

arXiv2026

Best Matches in Phylogenetic Networks

Best match graphs (BMGs) were introduced in mathematical phylogenetics to describe the concept of closest relatives for related genes (leaves of rooted tree) in different organisms (defining leaf colors). We generalize this concept here to leaf-colored rooted networks, where least common ancestors are in general neither unique nor comparable. We characterize BMGs of rooted networks as those vertex-colored digraphs that are properly colored and satisfy an easy-to-check condition that we call the sicor-in-hub property. BMGs can be recognized in linear time and an explaining network can be constructed in quadratic time. Analogous results are obtained for reciprocal best match graphs (RBMGs), where an edge $\{x,y\}$ corresponds to pairs of vertices with different color that are mutually closest relatives.

q-bio.PE↗

arXiv2026

Exact Counts of Binary Phylogenetic Networks with Four Reticulations

Phylogenetic networks provide a flexible framework for representing reticulate evolutionary processes, such as hybridization, introgression, recombination, and horizontal gene transfer. However, their combinatorial complexity makes even basic enumeration problems difficult. Building on our previous work for networks with up to three reticulations, we derive an explicit closed-form formula for the number of unrestricted rooted binary phylogenetic networks with four reticulations on $n$ labeled taxa. Our approach is based on tree-component graphs. We classify the 79 possible component graphs corresponding to networks with four reticulations into ten groups. We then enumerate the networks associated with each group by combining known counts of one-component networks, forests, and networks with fewer reticulations. Summing these contributions yields the desired formula. This result extends the exact enumeration of unrestricted binary phylogenetic networks to four reticulations and further demonstrates the effectiveness of component graphs for systematically organizing and counting increasingly complex network classes.

q-bio.PE↗