arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · q-bio/0406003

The principal eigenvector of contact matrices and hydrophobicity profiles in proteins

Ugo Bastolla·Markus Porto·H. Eduardo Roman·Michele Vendruscolo
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

With the aim to study the relationship between protein sequences and their native structures, we adopt vectorial representations for both sequence and structure. The structural representation is based on the Principal Eigenvector of the fold's contact matrix (PE). As recently shown, the latter encodes sufficient information for reconstructing the whole contact matrix. The sequence is represented through a Hydrophobicity Profile (HP), using a generalized hydrophobicity scale that we obtain from the principal eigenvector of a residue-residue interaction matrix and denote it as interactivity scale. Using this novel scale, we define the optimal HP of a protein fold, and predict, by means of stability arguments, that it is strongly correlated with the PE of the fold's contact matrix. This prediction is confirmed through an evolutionary analysis, which shows that the PE correlates with the HP of each individual sequence adopting the same fold and, even more strongly, with the average HP of this set of sequences. Thus, protein sequences evolve in such a way that their average HP is close to the optimal one, implying that neutral evolution can be viewed as a kind of motion in sequence space around the optimal HP. Our results indicate that the correlation coefficient between N-dimensional vectors constitutes a natural metric in the vectorial space in which we represent both protein sequences and protein structures, which we call Vectorial Protein Space. In this way, we define a unified framework for sequence to sequence, sequence to structure, and structure to structure alignments. We show that the interactivity scale is nearly optimal both for the comparison of sequences with sequences and sequences with structures.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.BM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ugo Bastolla, Markus Porto, H. Eduardo Roman, Michele Vendruscolo. 2004-06-01. The principal eigenvector of contact matrices and hydrophobicity profiles in proteins. https://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio/0406003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

SaltyMeta: a curated benchmark and protein language model-informed web tool for salty peptide prediction

Excess sodium intake remains a major public health challenge, while salty and saltiness-enhancing peptides offer a potential route to preserve sensory saltiness in reduced-sodium foods. Machine-learning studies of salty peptides, however, are constrained by small datasets, heterogeneous evidence standards, uncertain negative labels, and sequence similarity leakage. Here we present SaltyMeta, a curated benchmark and web-accessible screening framework for salty or saltiness-enhancing short peptides. The benchmark contains 580 peptides, including 280 positive peptides and 300 negative peptides, all standardized to 2-15 residue one-letter amino-acid sequences. Quality control found no non-standard residues, exact duplicates, or positive-negative overlaps. A similarity-grouped split retained 456 peptides for training and 124 for held-out testing. We evaluated 548 interpretable peptide descriptors, frozen ESM2 embeddings at 8M, 35M, and 150M parameter scales, and descriptor-embedding fusion models under grouped cross-validation. The traditional ExtraTrees baseline selected by training-set grouped cross-validation achieved ROC-AUC=0.693 in cross-validation and ROC-AUC=0.704, PR-AUC=0.702, F1=0.626, and MCC=0.304 on the held-out test set. The best initial protein-language-model fusion was traditional descriptors plus ESM2-8M embeddings, with grouped CV ROC-AUC=0.696 and test ROC-AUC=0.700. Advanced optimization using PCA95 dimensionality reduction and ExtraTrees feature-importance filtering yielded a practical ESM2-8M PCA95 top-300 model with test ROC-AUC=0.715 and PR-AUC=0.703, although repeated-CV gains remained modest. SaltyMeta is a transparent prioritization tool, not a sensory validation substitute. We provide benchmark, models, scripts, GitHub, and Streamlit for reproducible screening of food-derived peptides.

q-bio.BM↗
arXiv2026

Synthesizing State-of-the-Art Structure Predictions from Soup of Co-folding Models

Co-folding models have advanced rapidly, yet no single model consistently performs best across all biomolecular complexes. This raises the question of whether independently trained co-folding models encode complementary information that can be transferred across co-folding models. We introduce SoupFold, which improves co-folding predictions by learning simple mappings between the representation spaces of co-folding models. At inference time, SoupFold transfers and incorporates representations from other co-folding models to update the representation used for structure prediction. Importantly, this does not re-train the co-folding models. We evaluate SoupFold on protein-protein and protein-ligand prediction tasks of FoldBench using AlphaFold3, Protenix, ESMFold2, and OpenDDE. By combining their representations, SoupFold achieves state-of-the-art performance on both protein-protein and protein-ligand structure prediction, showing that independently trained co-folding models encode complementary information that can be effectively transferred across models.

q-bio.BM↗
arXiv2026

Exploring Optimal Parameters for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening in Early Drug Discovery

Ligand-based virtual screening depends on choices that are often treated as implementation details, including the similarity threshold, fingerprint setting and atom-invariant scheme. We examined how these choices altered the composition of ranked searches against the Enamine library for four aminergic reference ligands: atomoxetine, bupropion, mirtazapine and venlafaxine. Candidate sets were evaluated by compound-weighted scaffold novelty, normalized Shannon scaffold diversity and three computational estimates of synthetic accessibility. We first identified ligand-specific operating points along cumulative Tanimoto-ranked searches. We then compared five extended-connectivity fingerprint settings at matched retrieval depths and compared ECFP4 with the feature-class analogue FCSFP4. Finally, 240 records, corresponding to 229 unique structures, were scored independently by three chemists who were blinded to the computational scores. No single Tanimoto cutoff described all four searches. ECFP8 provided the most stable pooled setting, although venlafaxine favored ECFP2. ECFP4 was the stronger primary fingerprint in pooled comparisons, whereas FCSFP4 contributed nonredundant chemical space. Agreement among individual chemists was moderate, and the mean rating was more reliable than a single rating. SCScore showed the highest association with the blinded consensus, but performance varied by ligand. These results support a staged screening design in which a pooled default is followed by ligand-specific calibration and expert review.

q-bio.BM↗