arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · q-bio/0310003

Plant defense multigene families: I. Divergence of Fusarium solani-induced expression in Pisum and Lathyrus

Sandhya Tewari·Stuart M. Brown·Brian Fristensky
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The defense response in plants challenged with pathogens is characterized by the activation of a diverse set of genes. Many of the same genes are induced in the defense responses of a wide range of plant species. How plant defense gene families evolve may therefore provide an important clue to our understanding of how disease resistance evolves. Because studies usually focus on a single host species, little data are available regarding changes in defense gene expression patterns as species diverge. The expression of defense-induced genes PR10, chitinase and chalcone synthase was assayed in four pea species (Pisum sativum, P. humile, P. elatius and P. fulvum) and two Lathyrus species (L. sativus and L. tingitanus) which exhibited a range of infection phenotypes with Fusarium solani . In P. sativum, resistance was accompanied by a strong induction of defense genes at 8 hr. post-inoculation. Weaker induction was seen in susceptible interactions in wild species. Divergence in the timing of PR10 expression was most striking between P. sativum and its closest realtive, P. humile. Two members of this multigene family, designated PR10.1 and PR10.2, are strongly-expressed in response to Fusarium, while the PR10.3 gene is more weakly expressed, among Pisum species. The rapidity with which PR10 expression evolves raises the question, is divergence of defense gene expression a part of the phenotypic diversity underlying plant/pathogen coevolution?

Explore related subjects

q-bio.PE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sandhya Tewari, Stuart M. Brown, Brian Fristensky. 2003-10-07. Plant defense multigene families: I. Divergence of Fusarium solani-induced expression in Pisum and Lathyrus. https://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio/0310003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Evolution as fitness landscape navigation: concepts, measures, and emerging questions

Fitness landscapes are mappings between genotypes, phenotypes, and fitness that shape evolution. In recent years, empirical work and theoretical models have greatly advanced our understanding of how populations navigate rugged fitness landscapes. Here, we provide a timely review of the theoretical aspects of this field. Its rapidly growing literature employs a wide range of terms, which are sometimes used ambiguously or inconsistently. We therefore begin by defining the major concepts and the field's vocabulary, highlighting our own terminology choices wherever needed. We then review key results on the relationships between epistasis, ruggedness, accessibility, and navigability for genotype-fitness maps, highlighting several complex and sometimes counterintuitive connections that have emerged. Further, we review how the conserved structural properties of the underlying genotype-phenotype map, which can lead to the formation of large connected neutral networks of genotypes, influence dynamics on fitness landscapes. We then compare the two levels to study landscape navigation: the level of genotype-phenotype maps and the level of genotype-fitness maps. Our review leads us to propose a new measure of navigability, based on evolutionary outcomes, that is broadly applicable and overcomes limitations of existing measures. Finally, we highlight examples from the smaller body of work that relaxes the common assumption of fitness-monotonic paths on static landscapes, and discuss how this can fundamentally change the nature of fitness landscape navigation. Throughout the review, we identify directions for future work to fill existing gaps and to synthesize the disparate strands of research within the field.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

Best Matches in Phylogenetic Networks

Best match graphs (BMGs) were introduced in mathematical phylogenetics to describe the concept of closest relatives for related genes (leaves of rooted tree) in different organisms (defining leaf colors). We generalize this concept here to leaf-colored rooted networks, where least common ancestors are in general neither unique nor comparable. We characterize BMGs of rooted networks as those vertex-colored digraphs that are properly colored and satisfy an easy-to-check condition that we call the sicor-in-hub property. BMGs can be recognized in linear time and an explaining network can be constructed in quadratic time. Analogous results are obtained for reciprocal best match graphs (RBMGs), where an edge $\{x,y\}$ corresponds to pairs of vertices with different color that are mutually closest relatives.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

Exact Counts of Binary Phylogenetic Networks with Four Reticulations

Phylogenetic networks provide a flexible framework for representing reticulate evolutionary processes, such as hybridization, introgression, recombination, and horizontal gene transfer. However, their combinatorial complexity makes even basic enumeration problems difficult. Building on our previous work for networks with up to three reticulations, we derive an explicit closed-form formula for the number of unrestricted rooted binary phylogenetic networks with four reticulations on \(n\) labeled taxa. Our approach is based on tree-component graphs. We classify the 79 possible component graphs corresponding to networks with four reticulations into ten groups. We then enumerate the networks associated with each group by combining known counts of one-component networks, forests, and networks with fewer reticulations. Summing these contributions yields the desired formula. This result extends the exact enumeration of unrestricted binary phylogenetic networks to four reticulations and further demonstrates the effectiveness of component graphs for systematically organizing and counting increasingly complex network classes.

q-bio.PE↗