arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · physics/9905021

Test your surrogate data before you test for nonlinearity

D. Kugiumtzis
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The schemes for the generation of surrogate data in order to test the null hypothesis of linear stochastic process undergoing nonlinear static transform are investigated as to their consistency in representing the null hypothesis. In particular, we pinpoint some important caveats of the prominent algorithm of amplitude adjusted Fourier transform surrogates (AAFT) and compare it to the iterated AAFT (IAAFT), which is more consistent in representing the null hypothesis. It turns out that in many applications with real data the inferences of nonlinearity after marginal rejection of the null hypothesis were premature and have to be re-investigated taken into account the inaccuracies in the AAFT algorithm, mainly concerning the mismatching of the linear correlations. In order to deal with such inaccuracies we propose the use of linear together with nonlinear polynomials as discriminating statistics. The application of this setup to some well-known real data sets cautions against the use of the AAFT algorithm.

Explore related subjects

physics.data-anphysics.comp-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D. Kugiumtzis. 1999-05-07. Test your surrogate data before you test for nonlinearity. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.60.2808

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Combinations of measurements that are simultaneous fits of parameters of interest and systematic uncertainties using the BLUE method

Combining estimates of the same physics parameter obtained from different measurements improves the precision and robustness of the parameter determination. Modern particle physics measurements are often performed using likelihood fits that include the physics parameter(s) of interest together with nuisance parameters representing systematic uncertainties. In high-statistics analyses, typical of many analyses at the Large Hadron Collider, these nuisance parameters can be constrained in the likelihood fits. We describe how the Best Linear Unbiased Estimator method for combinations can be applied to both the estimates of the parameters of interest and the estimates of the nuisance parameters. We show with concrete example combinations that including the nuisance parameters can improve the precision on the parameters of interest. We show with pseudo-experiments that the uncertainty reported by the combination is reliable and that the approximate likelihood combination proposed in a previous publication and implemented in the Convino software reports an underestimated uncertainty. The method is implemented in an open-source software tool, Combiner.

physics.data-an↗
arXiv2026

Quantity, quality, and timing: Guiding glacier data assimilation strategies in the high Arctic

Accurate simulation of glacier surface mass balance is essential for predicting sea level rise and freshwater resources, but it is constrained by uncertainties in meteorological forcing and model parameters. Here, we deploy glacier data assimilation strategies to assess the value of observations for improving surface mass balance simulation, focusing on observation quantity, quality, and timing. We perform synthetic twin experiments on Kongsvegen glacier, Svalbard, using a Particle Batch Smoother with 1000 ensemble members. Synthetic observations of albedo, snow depth, and surface temperature are assimilated at two quality levels, under two climatic scenarios, and over 12 years. Assimilation benefit is measured as the percentage improvement in the continuous ranked probability score of the posterior glacier surface mass balance relative to the prior. A single optimally timed high quality observation yields mean improvements of up to 80\%. Larger numbers of low quality observations partially compensate for lower improvement. In the accumulation zone, however, additional snow depth observations degrade performance through particle degeneracy. Optimal timing is governed by the seasonal transitions of the truth trajectory rather than by prior ensemble spread alone. The optimal windows shift by up to six weeks between early and late melting years. Joint assimilation adds value through temporal diversity rather than observational diversity, while independently timed observations outperform same day combinations. The asynchronously optimally timed combined assimilation of three variables sustains improvements of 85 to 97\% across all years in the ablation zone. These findings provide guidelines for adaptive observation scheduling in glacier monitoring and reanalysis.

physics.data-an↗
arXiv2026

Mind the Gap: Navigating Inference with Optimal Transport Maps

Machine learning (ML) techniques have recently enabled enormous gains in sensitivity to new phenomena across the sciences. In particle physics, much of this progress has relied on excellent simulations of a wide range of physical processes. However, due to the sophistication of modern machine learning algorithms and their reliance on high-quality training samples, discrepancies between simulation and experimental data can significantly limit their effectiveness. In this work, we present a solution to this ``misspecification'' problem: a model calibration approach based on optimal transport, which we apply to high-dimensional simulations for the first time. We demonstrate the performance of our approach through jet tagging, using a dataset inspired by the CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. A 128-dimensional internal jet representation from a powerful general-purpose classifier is studied; after calibrating this internal ``latent'' representation, we find that a wide variety of quantities derived from it for downstream tasks are also properly calibrated: using this calibrated high-dimensional representation, powerful new applications of jet flavor information can be utilized in LHC analyses. This is a key step toward allowing the unbiased use of ``foundation models'' in particle physics. More broadly, this calibration framework has broad applications for correcting high-dimensional simulations across the sciences.

physics.data-an↗