arXiv · math/9712282
Was Sierpinski right? IV
Abstract
We prove for any mu = mu^{< mu}< theta < lambda, lambda large enough (just strongly inaccessible Mahlo) the consistency of 2^mu = lambda-> [theta]^2_3 and even 2^mu = lambda-> [theta]^2_{sigma,2} for sigma < mu . The new point is that possibly theta > mu^+ .
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Saharon Shelah. 1997-12-15. Was Sierpinski right? IV. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9712282
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.