arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · math/9503207

A LiFo dynamic dictionary

Josef Schoenbrunner
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Data structures that realize a dictionary are characterized by three basic instructions: (1) Insert (a new entry ). (2) Search by a key, returning the associated value. (3) Delete an entry. Known realizations are hashing schemes and various types of search trees. Time complexity of the fundamental operations is measured as a function of the number of entries $n$, the (binary) size of a key $s$ is usually not considered. For search trees the expected time as well as the upper limit of time is $O(\log n)$. "LiFo Dynamic Dictionary" (for short "LiFo Dictionary") is a new implementation, the time limits for "Insert" and for "Search" both are a linear function of the length $s$ of the used key, that is $O(s)$. "LiFo Dictionary" furthermore provides two additional basic operations: (4) "open environment" and (5) "close environment" with a constant time for performing. "Close environment" needs only one assignment by which it restores exactly the same internal situation as before the last call of "open environment". This feature cannot be realized by any of the data structures mentioned above, therefore the prefix LiFo (=last in first out), another name for STACK. This ability is highly suitable for software applications that frequently perform local symbol to value binding throughout multiple levels of environments. E.g. Lisp-Interpreters or D. Knuth's \TeX programm are such applications.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Josef Schoenbrunner. 1995-03-15. A LiFo dynamic dictionary. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9503207

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗