arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · math/0701003

To how many simultaneous hypothesis tests can normal, Student's t or bootstrap calibration be applied?

J. Fan·P. Hall·Q. Yao
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the analysis of microarray data, and in some other contemporary statistical problems, it is not uncommon to apply hypothesis tests in a highly simultaneous way. The number, $ν$ say, of tests used can be much larger than the sample sizes, $n$, to which the tests are applied, yet we wish to calibrate the tests so that the overall level of the simultaneous test is accurate. Often the sampling distribution is quite different for each test, so there may not be an opportunity for combining data across samples. In this setting, how large can $ν$ be, as a function of $n$, before level accuracy becomes poor? In the present paper we answer this question in cases where the statistic under test is of Student's $t$ type. We show that if either Normal or Student's $t$ distribution is used for calibration then the level of the simultaneous test is accurate provided $\logν$ increases at a strictly slower rate than $n^{1/3}$ as $n$ diverges. On the other hand, if bootstrap methods are used for calibration then we may choose $\logν$ almost as large as $n\half$ and still achieve asymptotic level accuracy. The implications of these results are explored both theoretically and numerically.

Explore related subjects

math.STstat.TH

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J. Fan, P. Hall, Q. Yao. 2006-12-29. To how many simultaneous hypothesis tests can normal, Student's t or bootstrap calibration be applied?. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0701003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Gaussian Approximation for High-Dimensional Weighted and Two-Sample $U$-statistics with Size-Dependent Kernels

We develop Gaussian approximations for high-dimensional vectors formed by second-order $U$-and $V$-statistics whose kernels depend on sample size. To accommodate weighted and two-sample $U$-and $V$-statistics within a unified framework, we establish our results under independent but not identically distributed (i.n.i.d.) sampling. The resulting theorems apply to a broad range of problems, including estimation in linear regression models with many covariates or many-weak instruments, variance component analysis, smoothed two-sample testing, and inference for separately exchangeable arrays, among others. Our results do not require either component of the Hoeffding decomposition to dominate, thereby covering both non-degenerate and degenerate regimes. In addition, we develop maximal inequalities for high-dimensional $U$-statistics with size-dependent kernels under the i.n.i.d.~setting, in a form that remains sharp across a broad range of applications, which may be of independent interest. Finally, applications to estimation and testing with many weak instrumental variables demonstrate that, our results are sharp enough to recover the corresponding fixed-dimensional rate conditions up to logarithmic factors.

math.ST↗
arXiv2026

Asymmetric conformal prediction with penalized kernel sum-of-squares

Conformal prediction (CP) is a distribution-free method to construct reliable prediction intervals that has gained significant attention in recent years. Despite its success and various proposed extensions, a significant practical feature which has been overlooked in previous research is the potential skewed nature of the noise, or of the residuals when the predictive model exhibits bias. In this work, we leverage recent developments in CP to propose a new asymmetric procedure that bridges the gap between skewed and non-skewed noise distributions, while still maintaining adaptivity of the prediction intervals. We introduce a new statistical learning problem to construct adaptive and asymmetric prediction bands, with a unique feature based on a penalty which promotes symmetry: when its intensity varies, the intervals smoothly change from symmetric to asymmetric ones. This learning problem is based on reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces and the recently introduced kernel sum-of-squares framework. First, we establish representer theorems to make our problem tractable in practice, and derive dual formulations which are essential for scalability to larger datasets. Second, the intensity of the penalty is chosen using a novel data-driven method which automatically identifies the symmetric nature of the noise. We show that consenting to some asymmetry can let the learned prediction bands better adapt to small sample regimes or biased predictive models.

math.ST↗
arXiv2026

The Pivotal Information Criterion

The Bayesian and Akaike information criteria aim at finding a good balance between under- and over-fitting. They are extensively used every day by practitioners. Yet we contend they suffer from at least two afflictions: their penalty parameters $λ=\log n$ and $λ=2$ are too small, leading to many false discoveries, and their inherent (best subset) discrete optimization is infeasible in high dimension. We alleviate these issues with the pivotal information criterion: PIC is defined as a continuous optimization problem, and the PIC penalty parameter $λ$ is selected at the detection boundary (under pure noise). PIC's choice of $λ$ is an upper quantile of a statistic that we prove to be (asymptotically) pivotal, provided the loss function is appropriately transformed. As a result, simulations show a phase transition in the probability of exact support recovery with PIC, a phenomenon studied with no noise in compressed sensing. Applied to real data, for similar predictive performances, PIC selects the least complex model among state-of-the-art learners.

math.ST↗