arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · math/0401104

Nonexistence of invariant rigid structures and invariant almost rigid structures

Abstract

We prove that certain volume preserving actions of Lie groups and their lattices do not preserve rigid geometric structures in the sense of Gromov. The actions considered are the "exotic" examples obtained by Katok and Lewis and the first author, by blowing up closed orbits in the well known actions on homogeneous spaces. The actions on homogeneous spaces all preserve affine connections, whereas the action along the exceptional divisor preserves a projective structure. The fact that these structures cannot in some way be "glued together" to give a rigid structure on the entire space is not obvious. We also define the notion of an almost rigid structure. The paradigmatic example of a rigid structure is a global framing and the paradigmatic example of an almost rigid structure is a framing that is degenerate along some exceptional divisor. We show that the actions discussed above do possess an invariant almost rigid structure. Gromov has shown that a manifold with rigid geometric structure invariant under a topologically transitive group action is homogeneous on an open dense set. How generally this open dense set can be taken to be the entire manifold is an important question with many dynamical applications. Our results indicate one way in which the geometric structure cannot degenerate off the open dense set.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E. Jerome Benveniste, David Fisher. 2004-01-10. Nonexistence of invariant rigid structures and invariant almost rigid structures. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0401104

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Monotonicity, global symplectification and the stability of Dry Ten Martini Problem

We prove that, for every irrational frequency and every analytic Type I potential, each supercritical spectral energy satisfying the gap-labelling condition is an endpoint of an open spectral gap. This establishes the conjecture of Ge--Jitomirskaya--You \cite{GJY,You} in the supercritical regime. Consequently, the ``all gaps open'' property of the supercritical almost Mathieu operator persists under sufficiently small analytic perturbations. The main ingredient is a global symplectification of the center bundle that preserves quantitative monotonicity. This allows us to study gap opening through the center dynamics of the dual long-range operator, which has no natural Schrödinger form. We first establish the result for trigonometric polynomial potentials and then pass to general analytic potentials by controlling the dependence on the truncation dimension. The proof combines a discrete Hellmann--Feynman identity, dimension-free Aubry duality in weighted analytic norms, and a quantitative cone argument based on pre-monotonicity. These estimates ensure that the gaps survive in the analytic limit. Our results establish analytic stability of the Dry Ten Martini Problem in the supercritical regime and give a partial answer to a question of M. Shamis on the persistence of periodic spectral gaps.

math.DS

Asymmetry of a class of Mellin transforms via bounded solutions

We introduce a family of parametrized non-homogeneous linear complex differential equations on $[1,\infty)$, depending on a complex parameter $s$ in the critical strip. We identify sufficient conditions on the non-homogeneous term that induce a structural asymmetry between the solutions corresponding to the parameters $s$ and $1-s$. More precisely, if both solutions with initial value $1$ are bounded on $[1,\infty)$, then necessarily $\Re(s)=\tfrac12$. The initial condition associated with the unique bounded solution corresponding to a parameter $s$ represents a zero of the Mellin transform associated with the non-homogeneous term at the point $s$.

math.DS

Self-similar Delone sets and Pisot numbers

We consider Delone point patterns with self-similarity. Under mild conditions, the similarity factor is a Pisot number if and only if the pattern is uniformly discrete. The classical case is a Meyer set $Λ$ with $Λ\supset θΛ$ for some $θ>1,$ for which $θ$ must be a Pisot number or a Salem number. When $Λ$ contains several similar copies of itself, the case of a Salem number drops out for $θ<2.$ On the other hand, strictly self-similar patterns with a Pisot factor must be Meyer sets. Various examples are given.

math.DS